Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Journal of the Geological Society; 1971; v. 127; issue.4; p. 374-375;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.127.4.0374
© 1971 Geological Society of London

DISCUSSION

Written contribution from Dr P. T. WALSHIn a paper to the Society in 1965, I drew attention to the geomorphological significance of the Ballydeenlea Senonian Chalk outlier at its altitude of about 120 m. A.S.L. It was suggested that the Chalk mass represented a karstic subsidence of sea-floor deposits, the subsidence being of the order of perhaps 100 m, thus placing the sub-Senonian Palaeozoic surface at the head of Dingle Bay at more than 480 m, and possibly as much as 800 m below the supposed ‘summit level surface’ in that part of Kerry. In discussing whether or not the Dingle Bay area could thus be interpreted essentially as an exhumed sub-Senonian landscape, I further drew attention to the significance of the minimum scale and style of post- Cretaceous synclinal folding which would be necessary for the Chalk also to cover the adjacent ranges of the Iveragh and Dingle peninsulas. It was demonstrated that the post-Cretaceous structural elevation of the Slieve Mish Anticline to the north of Dingle Bay would necessarily be about one-half of that achieved by the pre-Senonian movements on the base of the Carboniferous (Walsh I966 , Fig. 6). The writer thus welcomes the structural picture of the Cretaceous and post-Cretaceous rocks off the southern Irish coast that has emerged from geophysical evidence as providing further indirect evidence that it is unlikely that strong post-Cretaceous folding has affected the Munster fold-arc. However, it would be desirable to await further detailed reports on marine

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.