Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Journal of the Geological Society; 1972; v. 128; issue.6; p. 551-559;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.128.6.0551
© 1972 Geological Society of London

DISCUSSION

Mr P. EVANS, congratulated the authors on a very interesting and useful piece of work. There had been so much difference of opinion about the age of high-level erosion surfaces that it was important to have this definite evidence of a Pliocene surface.

The low relief of the 450 m Brassington surface suggested that it had been eroded to a base-level only a little below this. Sissons's Holme Moss surface was about 100 m higher, and Mr. Evans agreed that it would have supplied sediment: base-level might well have been the Bradfield level of about 400 m which is traceable at intervals as far as the south of France.

Old high sea-levels back to about 200 m at something over a million years ago could be plotted to give the rate of fall of sea-level for that spell of time, but to continue back to earlier periods was guesswork. His independent guess put the Brassington Beds at 4 million years, and the authors had guessed 7. In the present state of ignorance about Pliocene dates, the difference between guesses of 4 and 7 million years was not worth arguing about.

THE AUTHORS thanked Mr. Percy Evans for his kind remarks, but would naturally prefer to have their 7 million year dating for the sub-Brassington Formation surface accepted as a carefully-reasoned deduction, after many years of palaeobotanical research rather than a 'guess'. Having ascertained that the Kenslow flora was approximately of Mio-Pliocene boundary age, the 7 million year figure was derived

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.