Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LAJTAI, E. Z.
Right arrow Articles by LAJTAI, V. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1974; v. 130; issue.1; p. 1-16;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.130.1.0001
© 1974 Geological Society of London

The evolution of brittle fracture in rocks

EMERY Z. LAJTAI & VLASTA N. LAJTAI

At the macroscopic scale, the process of brittle fracture, leading to the formation of a macroscopic fault, involves several stages of fracture development. The usual sequence of events consists of the following stages: load-parallel tensile fracture, load-normal shear fracture, inclined shear fracture, strength failure, second order fracture and faulting. The first two stages can be defined quantitatively in terms of an elastic flaw concept which is based on the elastic stress distribution existing around the flaw prior to the appearance of the first fracture. The appropriate theories are developed through a stress model which, in departure from other brittle fracture theories, involves the stress gradient along the fracture path. Experimental results are introduced to demonstrate the general validity of the stress gradient model. The initiation of the first inclined shear fracture seems to be contingent on the existence of a quasi-cataclastic state produced by the earlier sets of load-parallel tensile and load-normal shear fractures. Because the original elastic stress distribution, including the stress anomaly around the flaw, is destroyed before the initiation of the inclined shear fracture, later events of fracture cannot be interpreted in terms of the elastic flaw model Probably a Coulomb-type mechanism, similar to the one involved in the failure of cohesionless, granular materials, controls the initiation and propagation of inclined shear fractures as well as the development of maximum resistance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. Ruffell, M. P. Coward, and M. Harvey
Geometry and tectonic evolution of megasequences in the Plymouth Bay Basin, English Channel
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1995; 91: 193 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. E. Strong and A. E. Milodowski
Aspects of the diagenesis of the Sherwood Sandstones of the Wessex Basin and their influence on reservoir characteristics
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1987; 36: 325 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]