Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MURRELL, S. A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1977; v. 133; issue.3; p. 175-189;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.133.3.0175
© 1977 Geological Society of London

Natural faulting and the mechanics of brittle shear failure

S. A. F. MURRELL

The theory of faulting developed since E. M. Anderson’s (1951) work, which is based on the concept of dislocations in an elastic continuum, is systematically discussed. Recent work enables the problem to be properly formulated in three dimensions and leads to the confirmation of Mohr’s hypothesis, on which Anderson’s theory was based, that faulting is independent of the intermediate principal stress. Estimates of the stress-differences existing in the crust and mantle (ranging up to several hundred MPa––several kb) emphasize the significance of conditions which enable the high friction existing on deep faults to be circumvented so that faulting can take place under small stress-differences. The Hubbert-Rubey (1959) hypothesis of lithostatic pore fluid pressures remains the most attractive mechanism for overcoming the problem of high friction.