Lyell Collection
Journal of the Geological Society
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHOLZ, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1977; v. 133; issue.3; p. 215-228;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.133.3.0215
© 1977 Geological Society of London

Transform fault systems of California and New Zealand: similarities in their tectonic and seismic styles

C. H. SCHOLZ

When the San Andreas fault system of California and the Alpine fault system of New Zealand are compared within the reference frame of their regional slip vectors, their major tectonic elements are seen to occupy similar positions. This argues that a genetic relationship exists between the development of these complexities.

Furthermore, three distinctive modes of slip, or ‘seismic style’, can be recognized for different segments of these major transform fault systems. These are: (1) slip during great (M ≥ 8) earthquakes separated by long periods of quiescence; (2) slip during more frequent large (6.5 ≤ M ≤ 7.5) earthquakes, and (3) aseismic slip (creep). These different seismic styles occur in distinctive tectonic settings and it is argued that they represent fundamental variations in the mechanical properties of the faults. I suggest that style 1 occurs along sections of the fault orientated such that a component of tectonic convergence occurs, leading to a high effective normal stress and hence high frictional strength. Style 2 occurs along sections of faults which strike close to the regional slip vector, and hence have a lower normal stress. Aseismic slip occurs only along sections of faults in central California where anomalously high pore pressures reduce the effective normal stress to a very low value and the fault is entirely within the stable sliding frictional field.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. Mann
Global catalogue, classification and tectonic origins of restraining- and releasing bends on active and ancient strike-slip fault systems
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 290: 13 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J.F. Dewey, M.R. Hempton, W.S.F. Kidd, F. Saroglu, and A.M.C. Sengor
Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia -- a young collision zone
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1986; 19: 1 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. G. Wesnousky
Crustal deformation processes and the stability of the Gutenberg-Richter relationship
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1999; 89: 1131 - 1137.
[Abstract] [PDF]