Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AGER, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1989; v. 146; issue.4; p. 603-605;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.146.4.0603
© 1989 Geological Society of London

Article

Short Paper: Lyell’s pillars and uniformitarianism

DEREK AGER

Department of Earth Sciences, University College, Swansea, W. Glam. SA2 8PP, UK

It is suggested that the Roman pillars at Pozzuoli, near Naples, the great symbols of uniformitarianism, record not gradual but very sudden changes in sea level and a more catastrophic, or at least episodic, concept of changes in the recent geological past than was envisaged by Charles Lyell.

The great symbols of uniformitarianism were the marine borings in the Roman pillars of Serapeo (Serapis) at Pozzuoli near Naples. Charles Lyell used the pillars as the frontispiece of his great book Principles of Geology 1831, which was to have such a fundamental effect on geological thought in the last century. They also appear on the reverse side of the Lyell Medal of the Geological Society of London. The importance of these pillars was that they proved that changes in sea level had occurred in historic times. They were the proof, it might be said, that the present may be used as the key to the past. If sea level changes could occur so recently, then all the complex pattern of transgressions and regressions in the geological past could be explained by reference to what was seen happening today. They put an end, it was thought, to catastrophism and the doctrine of sudden, short-lived episodes in earth history, which was always associated with the thought of that great Frenchman Georges Cuvier. But the Lyell and Cuvier of standard text-books are cardboard figures, as Stephen Gould called them (1987), Cuvier is particularly maligned and blamed for all the later excesses of catastrophism. It