Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1990; v. 147; issue.6; p. 1085-1090;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.147.6.1085
© 1990 Geological Society of London

Article

Discussion on a new palaeogeographic reconstruction for the Middle Jurassic of the northern North Sea

L. M. Fält & R. J. Steel write: Richards et al. 1988 have offered a new palaeogeographic reconstruction for the Middle Jurassic of the northern North Sea. We consider their suggestions as an interesting contribution to a continuing debate about Jurassic sand-body development and evolution in the northern North Sea basin. Nevertheless, we suggest from the perspective of the Norwegian sector that they are mistaken in some of their main points and, at best, they have not documented any convincing case. Richards et al. 1988 reject the ‘traditional’ model for the Middle Jurassic deltaic system of the Brent Group, one of general northwards progradation with a broadly convex deltaic-front morphology. They suggest instead a more complex model with an axial estuary (without any trunk river system!) and deltaic flanks with sediment supplied primarily from the East Shetland Platform and from the Horda Platform (Richards et al. 1988, fig. 1).

Our main problems with the suggestions of Richards et al. 1988 are as follows.

(1) They have attributed, to the ‘traditional’ model, a greater degree of precision than it has ever had. The nation of a general northwards progradation of Brent delta system, as developed through the works of Eynon (1981), Johnson and Stewart (1985), Graue et al. 1987, Brown et al. 1987, Helland-Hansen et al. 1989 and Fält et al. 1990 has never been dependent on the presence of a southerly dome as principal source area. There has been an increasing awareness of the likelihood of sediment contribution from the

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. Mellere and R. J. Steel
Tidal sedimentation in Inner Hebrides half grabens, Scotland: the Mid-Jurassic Bearreraig Sandstone Formation
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1996; 117: 49 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. C. Richards
An introduction to the Brent Group: a literature review
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1992; 61: 15 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
P. C. RICHARDS
An estuarine facies model for the Middle Jurassic Sleipner Formation: Beryl Embayment, North Sea
Journal of the Geological Society, 1991; 148: 459 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]