Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1991; v. 148; issue.3; p. 597-599;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.148.3.0597
© 1991 Geological Society of London

Article

Discussion of the significance of metre-scale allocycles in the quest for a fundamental stratigraphic unit

V. P. Wright & T. J. Faulkner write: Anderson & Goodwin (1990) have applied their punctuated aggradational cycle hypothesis to the Courceyan (Early Carboniferous) Shipway Limestone–Brofiscin Oolite sequence of the Gower, south Wales. While we freely admit to being converts to the idea that much of the sedimentary record contains abundant evidence of small-scale cyclicity, we totally disagree with their interpretation that this sequence is peritidal.

We have a number of small queries about their paper. They made no reference to two detailed papers describing the sections they discuss, namely those of Wu (1982) and Faulkner (1988). Also we have problems in reconciling their observations with our own, and with those of Ramsay (1987) and Wu (1982). For example, Anderson & Goodwin (p. 516) described the Shipway Limestone as a grainstone sequence while Faulkner (1988, fig. 4) identified very few grainstones in this interval. The log offered by Anderson & Goodwin (fig. 5) contained symbols not given on the key and failed to record the abundant crinoid material at many levels in the sequence, a fact not mentioned in their paper.

More significantly, they made no attempt to explain why they have re-interpreted the sequence as a peritidal deposit, which is at such variance to the offshore–shoreface interpretations offered by Wu (1982), Wright (1986), Ramsay (1987) and Faulkner (1988). They presented no evidence for peritidal conditions during deposition. The sequence does not contain any evidence of exposure features and if deposition took place predominantly in lower intertidal settings with low exposure indices,

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
V. P. Wright, V. P. WRIGHT, and S. D. VANSTONE
Onset of Late Palaeozoic glacio-eustasy and the evolving climates of low latitude areas: a synthesis of current understanding
Journal of the Geological Society, 2001; 158: 579 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]