Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLLOWAY, S.
Right arrow Articles by BEDDOE-STEPHENS, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1991; v. 148; issue.4; p. 635-638;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.148.4.0635
© 1991 Geological Society of London

SHORT PAPER

Distribution of granite and possible Devonian sediments in part of the East Shetland Platform, North Sea

S. HOLLOWAY1, D. M. REAY2, J. A. DONATO3 & B. BEDDOE-STEPHENS4

1 British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 SGG, UK
2 Geological Survey of Northern Ireland,20 College Gardens, Belfast BT9 6BS, UK
3 Goal Petroleum plc, New Bond Street House,1 New Bond Street, London W1Y 9PE, UK
4 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK

Seismic data on the East Shetland Platform, at about 59°50'N 1°12'E, image 4.7–6.6 km of folded possibly Devonian sediments partly coincident with a geophysical anomaly previously interpreted as a granite pluton at shallow depth. Seismic and potential field data constrain the possible distribution of granite, and well data indicate that shallow, lithologidly variable basement rocks may surround the deep ?Devonian basin. Geology Series Halibut Bank and Bressay Bank sheets. It shows the depth in metres below sea level to base Cretaceous, and the location of the northern end of seismicline FGS-64, illustrated in Fig. 3. Good control on the seismic reflectors down to base Jurassic is provided by well3/28-1.

Previous work. Although there is a positive gravity anomaly centred upon the western margin of the East Shetland Platform in block 9/3, Donato & Tully (1982) showed that there is a negative residual gravity anomaly in this area of the East Shetland Platform, when a regional gravity field, based on a model of crustal thinning beneath the Viking Graben, and the gravity effect of the known Tertiary and Mesozoic strata are subtracted from the observed gravity field. They modelled this negative residual gravity anomaly as a granite batholith 40 km in diameter, buried beneath approximately 2 km of sediments, with its centre close to seismic line FGS-64 (Fig.2)

Donato & Tully (1982) also described an associated horseshoe-shaped positive magnetic anomaly around the margins of the negative residual gravity anomaly (Fig. 2). They drew an analogy with Chevoit granite, where similar




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. Christiansson, J. I. Faleide, and A. M. Berge
Crustal structure in the northern North Sea: an integrated geophysical study
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000; 167: 15 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
D. W. Thomas and M. P. Coward
Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous inversion of the northern East Shetland Basin, northern North Sea
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1995; 88: 275 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]