Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOK, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1992; v. 149; issue.4; p. 615-620;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0615
© 1992 Geological Society of London

Article

Phosphogenesis around the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic transition

PETER J. COOK

British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK

There was a very significant and widespread phosphogenic event around the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic transition. This is reflected in the occurrence of many major and minor latest Proterozoic and Cambrian phosphate deposits (phosphorites) in Asia, Australia, Africa and South America, as well as minor occurrences in many other parts of the world. The major peak in phosphogenesis was in the Tommotian, with lesser events in the Ediacaran and the Lenian, bracketed by other minor though significant events. Recent evidence on the timing of Proterozoic phosphogenesis does not now support the suggestion of a phosphogenesis-glaciation link. These peaks in phosphogenesis are taken as evidence that there was a marked increase in the phosphate content of the shallow seas at about this time, possibly as a result of the circulation of deep, phosphorus-rich ocean waters into the photic zone. Not only was this responsible for the formation of phosphorites but it also had a profound effect on the biota, and may have been a driving mechanism for the Cambrian faunal ‘explosion’ and the initiation of biomineralization.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
A. Yu. Zhuravlev and R. A. Wood
Eve of biomineralization: Controls on skeletal mineralogy
Geology, 2008; 36: 923 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
Closing the Phosphatization Window: Testing for the Influence of Taphonomic Megabias on the Pattern of Small Shelly Fossil Decline
Palaios, 2004; 19: 178 - 183.



Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
N. J. Butterfield
Exceptional Fossil Preservation and the Cambrian Explosion
Integr. Comp. Biol., 2003; 43: 166 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ajsHome page
R. Petrovich
Mechanisms of Fossilization of the Soft-Bodied and Lightly Armored Faunas of the Burgess Shale and of Some Other Classical Localities
Am J Sci, 2001; 301: 683 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
A. YU. ROZANOV
Some problems concerning the Precambrian-Cambrian transition and the Cambrian faunal radiation
Journal of the Geological Society, 1992; 149: 593 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
M. E. TUCKER
The Precambrian-Cambrian boundary: seawater chemistry, ocean circulation and nutrient supply in metazoan evolution, extinction and biomineralization
Journal of the Geological Society, 1992; 149: 655 - 668.
[Abstract] [PDF]