Lyell Collection
Journal of the Geological Society
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by XIUMING, L.
Right arrow Articles by HELLER, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1993; v. 150; issue.3; p. 583-588;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.150.3.0583
© 1993 Geological Society of London

Papers

Magnetic susceptibility of the Chinese loess–palaeosol sequence: environmental change and pedogenesis

LIU XIUMING1,2, JOHN SHAW1, LIU TUNGSHENG2 & FRIEDRICH HELLER3

1 Geomagnetism Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX UK
2 Institute of Geology, Academia Sinica, PO Box 634, Beijing 100029, China
3 Institut für Geophysik, ETH-Hönggerberg, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland

Pronounced differences in concentration, alignment and grain-size distribution of the magnetic minerals have been identified between loess and palaeosol samples from the section at Xifeng (Central Chinese loess plateau). Superparamagnetic magnetite formed in situ plays an important role in controlling magnetic low field susceptibility. The variable brown-red colouration of the loess-palaeosol sequence is due to a significant hematite component produced by pedogenesis. The magnetic fabric of the palaeosols is weaker than that of the loesses. This is taken as evidence that the formation of ultrafine ferromagnetic minerals by pedogenesis is the most likely explanation for the observed susceptibility enhancement in palaeosols (4 to 10 times higher than in loesses). It is argued that variations of frequency dependent susceptibility are sensitive recorders of second order palaeoclimatic variations during glacial periods, whereas bulk susceptibility seems to be an appropriate measure of palaeoclimate change during interglacial periods.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Equatorial Aridity in Western Pangea: Lower Permian Loessite and Dolomitic Paleosols in Northeastern New Mexico, U.S.A.
Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2001; 71: 817 - 832.


Home page
 Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
E. DERBYSHIRE, R. A. KEMP, and X. MENG
Climate change, loess and palaeosols: proxy measures and resolution in North China
Journal of the Geological Society, 1997; 154: 793 - 805.
[Abstract] [PDF]