Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZIEGLER, P.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1993; v. 150; issue.5; p. 927-940;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.150.5.0927
© 1993 Geological Society of London

Thematic set: Plate-moving mechanisms

Plate-moving mechanisms: their relative importance

William Smith Lecture 1992

P.A. ZIEGLER

Geological-Palaeontological Institute, University of Basel, Bernoullistr. 32, CH-4065 Basel, Switzerland

The lithosphere forms the upper boundary layer of the Earth's mantle convection system which facilitates escape of thermal energy from the Earth's interior. Motion and interaction of lithospheric plates is probably governed by the combination of drag-forces excerted on the base of the lithosphere by the convecting mantle and by plate boundary forces. Phanerozoic movements and interaction of major continental blocks are difficult to explain in terms of conventional plate moving mechanisms, such as slab-forces, ridge-push and deviatoric tensional stresses developing over upwellings of the asthenosphere and in response to lithospheric over-thickening in orogenic belts. Circumstantial evidence suggests that shear-traction exerted by the convecting asthenosphere on the base of the lithosphere plays an important, and at times even a dominant role as a plate moving mechanism. The relative importance of the different processes contributing to the motion of lithospheric plates probably varies during the assembly and break-up of Pangaea-type megacontinents. Continents assemble in areas of downwelling branches of the asthenospheric convection system. Development of major orogens along the trailing edges of drifting continents and subduction-progradation from the megasuture of colliding continents to their distal margins suggests that plate convergence is controlled, apart from slab-forces and ridge-push, also by shear-traction. Assembly of a Pangaea has an insulating effect on the downwelling convection cells, governing its suturing, causes their decay and a reorganization of the global upper-mantle convection system. Development of new upwelling and outflowing asthenospheric cells under mega-continents gives rise to tensional stresses in the lithosphere, causing its extension. Following crustal separation, the asthenosphere advects passively into the space opening between diverging plates. Progressive opening of oceanic basins is coupled with the development of ridge-push forces, contributing to plate divergence. Activity along sea-floor spreading axes can terminate abruptly if far-field stresses, resulting from plate interaction, impede further plate divergence. The nearly contemporaneous decay of sea-floor spreading axes in often distant areas reflects changes in plate interaction. Assuming a finite globe, generation of new lithosphere at sea-floor spreading axes has to be compensated for elsewhere by subduction of commensurate amounts of oceanic lithosphere and/or shortening and subduction of continental lithosphere. Plate interaction, driven largely by shear-traction of the mantle convection systems and their changes, ridge-push and slab forces, plays probably an all-important role in the development of intra-continental rift systems, the opening of new oceanic basins and the inception of and activity along subduction zones. A two-layered mantle convection system is envisaged, that may be coupled to a greater degree during the break-up of mega-continents than during periods of dispersed continents.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
A. G. Dore, E. R. Lundin, N. J. Kusznir, and C. Pascal
Potential mechanisms for the genesis of Cenozoic domal structures on the NE Atlantic margin: pros, cons and some new ideas
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2008; 306: 1 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, MemoirsHome page
A. Saintot, R. A. Stephenson, S. Stovba, M.-F. Brunet, T. Yegorova, and V. Starostenko
The evolution of the southern margin of Eastern Europe (Eastern European and Scythian platforms) from the Latest Precambrian- Early Palaeozoic to the Early Cretaceous
Geological Society, London, Memoirs, 2006; 32: 481 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J. Mosar, J. Mosar, G. Lewis, and TrondH. Torsvik
North Atlantic sea-floor spreading rates: implications for the Tertiary development of inversion structures of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea
Journal of the Geological Society, 2002; 159: 503 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
M. H. P. BOTT
Modelling the plate-driving mechanism
Journal of the Geological Society, 1993; 150: 941 - 951.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
C. DOGLIONI
Geological evidence for a global tectonic polarity
Journal of the Geological Society, 1993; 150: 991 - 1002.
[Abstract] [PDF]