Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOGLIONI, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1993; v. 150; issue.5; p. 991-1002;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.150.5.0991
© 1993 Geological Society of London

Thematic set: Plate-moving mechanisms

Geological evidence for a global tectonic polarity

C. DOGLIONI

Dipartimento di Geologia e Geofisica, Campus Universitario, V. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy

Inferences about plate motions over the past 40 Ma, based on structural and geodetic data, suggest that there is a coherent movement direction on a global scale. Moreover a ‘westward’ drift of the lithosphere relative to the asthenosphere is indicated by plate motions in the hot-spot reference frame. Independent geological observations such as the different styles of deformation in thrust belts associated with subduction following or opposing the relative ‘eastward or northeastward’ mantle flow also support this global tectonic polarity. Unfortunately most hot-spot reference frames are based on assumptions which strongly limit their validity. For example, many combine magmatic sources originating from different depths in the mantle, including hot-spots located along oceanic ridges which are not fixed relative to one another. Using a hot-spot reference frame filtered to exclude shallow hot-spots and anomalous ‘wet-spots’, we would predict a much higher relative ‘westward’ drift of the lithosphere. Plate motions are not random, rather that they are controlled by the relative motion between lithosphere and asthenosphere, and by gradients in lithospheric thickness and composition.Triangular shaped plates may experience rotations resulting from differential drag at the base of the lithosphere with respect to the asthenosphere (e.g. the clockwise rotation of South America). Plates appear to follow an undulatory pattern of motion on a global scale and their poles of rotation fall into a main cone located near the Earth’s rotation poles. Plate rotations induced by triangular shape, differential basal drag or lithospheric anisotropies along subduction zones may generate the scattered distribution of Euler poles. This might have inhibited the recognition of a coherent global tectonic pattern.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
B. Scoppola, D. Boccaletti, M. Bevis, E. Carminati, and C. Doglioni
The westward drift of the lithosphere: A rotational drag?
Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2006; 118: 199 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
R. Harris
Geodynamic patterns of ophiolites and marginal basins in the Indonesian and New Guinea regions
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 218: 481 - 505.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
C. Doglioni, E. Gueguen, P. Harabaglia, and F. Mongelli
On the origin of west-directed subduction zones and applications to the western Mediterranean
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1999; 156: 541 - 561.
[Abstract] [PDF]