Lyell Collection
Journal of the Geological Society
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAISER, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by FINLEY, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1994; v. 151; issue.3; p. 417-420;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.151.3.0417
© 1994 Geological Society of London

Article

Geological and hydrological controls on the producibility of coalbed methane

W. R. KAISER, D. S. HAMILTON, A. R. SCOTT, ROGER TYLER & R. J. FINLEY

Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78713, USA

Geological and hydrological comparison of two United States coalbed methane basins, the prolific San Juan Basin and the marginally producing Sand Wash Basin, indicates that coal distribution and rank, gas content, permeability, ground-water flow, and depositional and structural setting are critical controls on coalbed methane producibility. A complex interplay, and moreover, a synergy amongst these controls determines high productivity. This paper proposes a basin-scale explanation for the prolific and marginal production in the two basins and that can be applied to evaluation of coalbed methane potential in coal basins worldwide. High productivity is governed by (1) thick, laterally continuous coals of high thermal maturity, (2) basinward flow of ground water through coals of high rank and gas content orthogonally toward no-flow boundaries (regional hingelines, fault systems, facies changes, and/or discharge areas), and (3) conventional trapping along those boundaries to provide additional gas beyond that sorbed on the coal surface.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AAPG BulletinHome page
Differential transport of CO2 and CH4 in coalbed aquifers: Implications for coalbed gas distribution and composition
AAPG Bulletin, 2004; 88: 1149 - 1161.


Home page
 AAPG BulletinHome page
Possible controls of hydrogeological and stress regimes on the producibility of coalbed methane in Upper Cretaceous-Tertiary strata of the Alberta basin, Canada
AAPG Bulletin, 2003; 87: 1729 - 1754.


Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
E. L. Boardman and J. H. Rippon
Coalbed methane migration in and around fault zones
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1997; 125: 391 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]