Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VASEY, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1994; v. 151; issue.6; p. 1023-1033;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.151.6.1023
© 1994 Geological Society of London

Article

Classification of Carboniferous non-marine bivalves: systematics versus stratigraphy

G. M. VASEY

Department of Applied Geology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UKPresent address: Cap Gemini America, International Oil & Gas Sector, Three Riverway No. 1420, Houston, TX 77056 USA

Carboniferous non-marine bivalves are usually classified at the ‘species’ level using external morphological criteria through comparison with figured and described type specimens. This system of nomenclature has allowed the recognition of stratigraphically useful morphospecies.

Biometric analysis of a large number of shells of the genus Anthraconauta Pruvost, collected from the Sydney coalfield, Nova Scotia, suggests. that this system of nomenclature cannot be justified biologically. The genus appears to be morphologically homogeneous in the Upper Carboniferous of Western Europe and North America. Shell shape variation is influenced by mode of life and palaeoenvironment, as suggested by the study of modern analogues and fossil shells. If a biological classification were adopted for this group of fossils, then all their stratigraphical value would be lost.

To reconcile systematics with the needs of stratigraphers, the adoption of a trinomial nomenclature is recommended. The use of cluster analysis has shown that varieties can be identified that correspond morphologically to previously named and described ‘species’. Nomenclature of the form genus, species and variety would be both biologically correct and stratigraphically useful.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicropaleontologyHome page
N. E. Tibert and C. P. Dewey
Velatomorpha, a new healdioidean ostracode genus from the early Pennsylvanian Joggins Formation, Nova Scotia, Canada
Micropaleontology, 2006; 52: 51 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]