Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1994; v. 151; issue.6; p. 1045-1048;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.151.6.1045
© 1994 Geological Society of London

Article

Discussion on a Pre-D2 age for the Ben Vuirich Granite

P. A. R. Nell & J. E. Treagus write: In their paper concerned with the structural context of the 590 Ma Ben Vuirich granite, Tanner & Leslie (1994) demonstrate that the contact metamorphism post-dates the first (S1) slaty cleavage. It is also pleasing to see Maclachlan & Treagus's (1991) assertion confirmed, that it is the regional schistosity (S2) which foliated the granite; this schistosity has been well-documented to the southwest of the granite (Nell 1986; Treagus 1987) as well as to its northeast (Upton 1986).

The question will be asked, however, particularly by workers unfamiliar with the Dalradian, how could the crucial structural context of this granite be misconstrued by previous workers (Bradbury et al. 1976; Rogers et al. 1989) as post-D2 and pre-D3. These interpretations, which had placed the important D2 nappe-forming event of the Grampian fold-belt before intrusion of the dated granite, have had far-reaching effects upon tectonic models of the late Precambrian and early Palaeozoic evolution of Britain. The answer lies partly in the apparent mis-interpretation of local detail, relating to the granite margins and the fabric in xenoliths, matters which Tanner & Leslie (1994) have addressed. We would like to address here the more important question of why local fabrics were miscorrelated with those elsewhere in the fold-belt. All locations mentioned below are located on Fig. 1.

The continuity of the ubiquitous second deformation (D2) event in the Dalradian can be seen from the observations of many workers: from the Southwest Highlands, where it is first

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
N. J. SOPER, P. D. RYAN, and J. F. DEWEY
Age of the Grampian orogeny in Scotland and Ireland
Journal of the Geological Society, 1999; 156: 1231 - 1236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scottish Journal of GeologyHome page
E. R. Phillips and C. A. Auton
Ductile fault rocks and metamorphic zonation in the Dalradian of the Highland Border SW of Stonehaven, Kincardineshire
Scottish Journal of Geology, 1997; 33: 83 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]