Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McBIRNEY, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1995; v. 152; issue.3; p. 421-435;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.152.3.0421
© 1995 Geological Society of London

Article

Mechanisms of differentiation in the Skaergaard Intrusion

A. R. McBIRNEY

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA

Thanks to its magnificent exposures and extraordinary petrologic development, the Skaergaard Intrusion provides an excellent test for three basic mechanisms of crystal-liquid fractionation: diffusive exchange, compaction, convective exchange. (1) Diffusive exchange at the solidification front does not seem to have played a major role, for no obvious difference is seen in the behavior of components of widely differing diffusivities. The effects of diffusion were probably masked by porous flow of the interstitial liquid. (2) Compaction and 'filter pressing' of residual liquids can be tested by comparing concentrations of incompatible elements in parts of the intrusion that crystallized in different orientations with respect to gravity. The contrast between the large concentrations of these elements in the Upper Border Series and consistently smaller abundances in the Layered Series, long thought to ‘be due to contamination of the upper levels with crustal rocks, is more likely a result of compaction that took place at the floor but not under the roof. (3) Convective exchange driven by differences in the compositional densities of the main magma and interstitial liquids seems to have been important at the steep walls and, to a lesser degree, under the roof. It may also have been responsible for a large compositional anomaly near the centre of the Layered Series where an iron-rich liquid percolated down through parts of Lower and Middle Zones. At later stages of crystallization when density relations were reversed, a buoyant liquid, rich in volatiles and incompatible elements, rose from the Layered Series and permeated the upper part of the intrusion. A liquid of this latter kind could have caused the pervasive metasomatic alteration seen in much of the Layered Series. In both compaction and convective exchange, re-equilibration and reactions between migrating liquids and early-formed crystals augmented permeabilities and brought about extensive compositional and textural changes.

Although inhomogeneities in the initial magma could account for some of the compositional variations, the main trend of differentiation can be ascribed to a combination of compaction and convective fractionation. The convective flow was of two kinds, one of descending iron-rich liquids and another of more evolved rising liquids (and fluids) with low densities and large concentrations of incompatible elements. In the early stages, the proportions of iron-rich liquids were much greater than those of the silica-rich variety, and until the crystallization fronts converged at the Sandwich Horizon, the former made the greatest contribution to evolution of the main body of magma. As crystallization advanced, however, light, silica-rich liquids became more important; they permeated the Upper Border Series and much of the upper part of the Layered Series. This late-stage liquid continued to differentiate after the crystallization fronts met; a secondary Sandwich Horizon was formed where incompatible elements reach maximum concentrations in the lower part of the Upper Border Series.

Key Words: Skaergaard Intrusion • differentiation • layered intrusions




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
T. Kuritani, T. Yokoyama, and E. Nakamura
Rates of Thermal and Chemical Evolution of Magmas in a Cooling Magma Chamber: a Chronological and Theoretical Study on Basaltic and Andesitic Lavas from Rishiri Volcano, Japan
J. Petrology, 2007; 48: 1295 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
S. BOORMAN, A. BOUDREAU, and F. J. KRUGER
The Lower Zone-Critical Zone Transition of the Bushveld Complex: a Quantitative Textural Study
J. Petrology, 2004; 45: 1209 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. Nemcok, J. N. Moore, R. Allis, and J. McCulloch
Fracture development within a stratovolcano: the Karaha-Telaga Bodas geothermal field, Java volcanic arc
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 231: 223 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
A. R. McBIRNEY and R. A. CREASER
The Skaergaard Layered Series, Part VII: Sr and Nd Isotopes
J. Petrology, 2003; 44: 757 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
A. M. GAFFNEY
Environments of Crystallization and Compositional Diversity of Mauna Loa Xenoliths
J. Petrology, 2002; 43: 963 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
A. R. McBIRNEY
The Skaergaard Layered Series. Part VI. Excluded Trace Elements
J. Petrology, 2002; 43: 535 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
F. COSTA, M. A. DUNGAN, and B. S. SINGER
Hornblende- and Phlogopite-Bearing Gabbroic Xenoliths from Volcan San Pedro (36{degrees}S), Chilean Andes: Evidence for Melt and Fluid Migration and Reactions in Subduction-Related Plutons
J. Petrology, 2002; 43: 219 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. S. SCOATES
The Plagioclase-Magma Density Paradox Re-examined and the Crystallization of Proterozoic Anorthosites
J. Petrology, 2000; 41: 627 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]