Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1997; v. 154; issue.5; p. 917-919;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.154.5.0917
© 1997 Geological Society of London

Article

Discussion on a late Vendian age for the Kinlochlaggan Boulder Bed (Dalradian)

J. E. Treaguswrites: I am puzzled by the title of the paper b Evans & Tanner (1996), in which they propose to correlate the Kinlochlaggan Boulder Bed with the Port Askaig Tillite Formation. According to Harland (1990), the Vendian is the period preceding the Cambrian and divided into two epochs, the earlier Varanger and the later Ediacara. It is with this early Vendian Varanger epoch, that the Port Askaig Tillite Formation of the Dalradian of Scotland and Ireland can b broadly correlated. As far as I am aware, the late Vendiain Ediacara epoch contains no glaciogenic materials.

The real subject matter of the paper, however, is the authors’ proposal of the stratigraphical and structural position for the Kinlochlaggan Boulder Bed (KBB). Contrary to my original suggestion (Treagus 1969) that the KBB lay in an upward-facing succession which could be correlated with the lower par of the Appin Group, they propose that it lies within an inverted succession which can be correlated with the upper part of the Appin and lower part of the Argyll Group. I considered the latter correlation (Treagus 1969), but rejected it on the grounds of dissimilarities of the lithologies involved, am the greater similarities with the succession near the base of the Appin Group.

Without repeating the broad similarities of the two successions in the alternative correlations, I would like to make the following points, in favour of my original interpretation.

(1) The succession of pelites and psammites above the KBB frequently contain microcline perthite

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
S. ROBERTSON and M. SMITH
The significance of the Geal Charn-Ossian Steep Belt in basin development in the Central Scottish Highlands
Journal of the Geological Society, 1999; 156: 1175 - 1182.
[Abstract] [PDF]