Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Journal of the Geological Society; 1998; v. 155; issue.2; p. 423-424;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.155.2.0423
© 1998 Geological Society of London

Article

Discussion on continental eclogites and the Wilson Cycle

H. Austrheim & A. K. Engrik writes: Recent attempts to model continent collision zones have focused attention on processes in, and the petrophysical properties of, crustal root zones. In particular the density changes during the formation of eclogites and their back reaction to amphibolites and granulites have been used to explain various aspects of collision orogens such as seismic velocity, crustal thickness, orogenic uplift and exposure of high P-rocks (Dewey et al. 1993). We are happy to see that Ryan & Dewey (1997) now also introduce the rheological properties of an eclogitized crust into their models and point to the importance this may have for the opening and closing of oceans (the Wilson cycle). Ryan & Dewey (1997) use observations from the Bergen Arcs of Western Norway as evidence of low shear-strength in an eclogitized crust. We agree that the Bergen example shows that eclogites, at some stage in their evolution, had much lower strength than their granulite facies protolith (see discussions by Austrheim 1991, 1994). A similar situation can also be observed in the Sunnfjord area, Western Gneiss Region (Norway), where granulites of mafic and leucocratic composition form lenses in an eclogite-facies melange-like rock (Austrheim et al. 1997). The geodynamic significance of the weakening must, however, depend on its cause and the duration of the weakening. The possible reasons for this weakening were discussed by Klaper (1990) and Austrheim (1991).While Ryan & Dewey (1997) model weakening of orogenic lithosphere as a function of heat production

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J. H. Scarrow, J. H. Scarrow, C. Ayala, and G. S. Kimbell
Insights into orogenesis: getting to the root of a continent-ocean-continent collision, Southern Urals, Russia
Journal of the Geological Society, 2002; 159: 659 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
A. K. ENGVIK, H. AUSTRHEIM, and T. B. ANDERSEN
Structural, mineralogical and petrophysical effects on deep crustal rocks of fluid-limited polymetamorphism, Western Gneiss Region, Norway
Journal of the Geological Society, 2000; 157: 121 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]