|
Article |
School of Geological Sciences, CEESR, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston-upon-Thames KT1 2EE, UK (e-mail: j.clemens{at}kingston.ac.uk)
This review presents a summary of most current beliefs about the origins of granitic magmas, together with calculations of some important properties of granitic melts and magmas. Turning attention to magma ascent mechanisms, diapirism and dyking represent two competing end-member models. The differences in processes and products between the two are fundamental, and the implications of the differences are profound for the evolution of the continental crust.
The weight of evidence favours dyke ascent for the majority of granitic magmas, and modelling shows that dyke ascent is both rapid and thermally effcient. Furthermore, the structural and petrological features expected in crust through which granitic diapirs have passed have not been discovered in nature. Granites in the upper crust commonly have forms and structures indicating that diapirism could not have been the emplacement mechanism. In contrast, granitic dykes are common, suggesting that it is reasonable to consider the ascent of granitic magmas through fracture systems. Many granitic batholiths are tabular and some have been fed by large dykes. The rate-limit in granitic plutonism is not magma ascent, but either the rate of melting and segregation (near the magma source) or the rate of deformation (at the emplacement site)
Key Words: granites • magmas • diapirs • dykes • batholiths
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Brown Crustal melting and melt extraction, ascent and emplacement in orogens: mechanisms and consequences Journal of the Geological Society, 2007; 164: 709 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Stewart Salt tectonics in the North Sea Basin: a structural style template for seismic interpreters Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2007; 272: 361 - 396. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. S. Barker ENDOGENOUS AND EXOGENOUS PLUTONS: THE INFLUENCE OF EMPLACEMENT STYLE ON CONTAMINATION OF GRANITIC MAGMA Can Mineral, 2007; 45: 63 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Brown Synergistic effects of melting and deformation: an example from the Variscan belt, western France Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2005; 243: 205 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Roman-Berdiel Geometry of granite emplacement in the upper crust: contributions of analogue modelling Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1999; 168: 77 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Mazzarini, G. Corti, G. Musumeci, and F. Innocenti Tectonic control on laccolith emplacement in the northern Apennines fold-thrust belt: the Gavorrano intrusion (southern Tuscany, Italy) Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004; 234: 151 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. D'Eramo, L. Pinotti, J.M. Tubia, N. Vegas, A. Aranguren, R. Tejero, and D. Gomez Coalescence of lateral spreading magma ascending through dykes: a mechanism to form a granite canopy (El Hongo pluton, Sierras Pampeanas, Argentina) Journal of the Geological Society, 2006; 163: 881 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. BROWN and A. TRYGGVASON Ascent mechanism of the Dzhabyk batholith, southern Urals: constraints from URSEIS reflection seismic profiling Journal of the Geological Society, 2001; 158: 881 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. G. Whittington and P. J. Treloar Crustal anatexis and its relation to the exhumation of collisional orogenic belts, with particular reference to the Himalaya Mineralogical Magazine, 2002; 66: 53 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. P. Richards, A. J. Boyce, and M. S. Pringle Geologic Evolution of the Escondida Area, Northern Chile: A Model for Spatial and Temporal Localization of Porphyry Cu Mineralization Economic Geology, 2001; 96: 271 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S.A. Stewart How will we recognize buried impact craters in terrestrial sedimentary basins? Geology, 2003; 31: 929 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. A. McNulty, O. T. Tobisch, A. R. Cruden, and S. Gilder Multistage emplacement of the Mount Givens pluton, central Sierra Nevada batholith, California GSA Bulletin, 2000; 112: 119 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.A. Wiebe, K.D. Blair, D.P. Hawkins, and C.P. Sabine Mafic injections, in situ hybridization, and crystal accumulation in the Pyramid Peak granite, California GSA Bulletin, 2002; 114: 909 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. de Saint-Blanquat, R. D. Law, J.-L. Bouchez, and S. S. Morgan Internal structure and emplacement of the Papoose Flat pluton: An integrated structural, petrographic, and magnetic susceptibility study GSA Bulletin, 2001; 113: 976 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Johnson, M. Albertz, and S. R. Paterson Growth rates of dike-fed plutons: Are they compatible with observations in the middle and upper crust? Geology, 2001; 29: 727 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. CLEMENS and N. PETFORD Granitic melt viscosity and silicic magma dynamics in contrasting tectonic settings Journal of the Geological Society, 1999; 156: 1057 - 1060. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. G. BARNES, A. S. YOSHINOBU, T. PRESTVIK, O. NORDGULEN, H. R. KARLSSON, and B. SUNDVOLL Mafic Magma Intraplating: Anatexis and Hybridization in Arc Crust, Bindal Batholith, Norway J. Petrology, 2002; 43: 2171 - 2190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. W. RAPELA, E. G. BALDO, R. J. PANKHURST, and J. SAAVEDRA Cordieritite and Leucogranite Formation during Emplacement of Highly Peraluminous Magma: the El Pilon Granite Complex (Sierras Pampeanas, Argentina) J. Petrology, 2002; 43: 1003 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
