Lyell Collection
Journal of the Geological Society
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CRAMPIN, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 1999; v. 156; issue.3; p. 501-514;
DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.156.3.0501
© 1999 Geological Society of London

Article

Calculable fluid–rock interactions

STUART CRAMPIN

Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, UK (e-mail: scrampin{at}ed.ac.uk)

This paper introduces a model of rock deformation (anisotropic poro-elasticity or APE), where the response of fluid-saturated rock to changing conditions, prior to fracturing, can be calculated. The driving mechanism for deformation is fluid migration along pressure gradients between neighbouring intergranular microcracks and pores at different orientations to the stress field. The parameters that control changes to microcrack geometry also control the splitting (birefringence) of seismic shear-waves, so that changes in deformation can be directly monitored by analysing the shear-wave splitting which is observed in almost all rocks. Analysis of shear-wave splitting in the Earth's crust and APE-modelling show that distributions of, mostly intergranular, cracks in the crust are always geometrically close to fracturing with the implication that shear-wave splitting is sensitive to comparatively minor changes of stress and minor changes of in situ conditions. This has important implications for the state of criticality of the rockmass and, as a consequence, changes in shear-wave splitting have been observed before larger earthquakes on those few occasions when suitable source–receiver geometry coincides with appropriate seismic activity. APE also has implications for monitoring changing conditions in reservoirs during hydrocarbon recovery.

Key Words: anisotropy • fluid–rock interactions • microcracks • shear-wave splitting




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeologyHome page
S. Crampin, Y. Gao, and S. Peacock
Stress-forecasting (not predicting) earthquakes: A paradigm shift?
Geology, 2008; 36: 427 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
S. Crampin and Y. Gao
Comment on "Systematic Analysis of Shear-Wave Splitting in the Aftershock Zone of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Shallow Crustal Anisotropy and Lack of Precursory Changes, by Yungfeng Liu, Ta-Liang Teng, and Yehuda Ben-Zion"
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2005; 95: 354 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
3D Velocity Structure around the Source Area of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake: Before and After the Mainshock
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004; 91: 1013 - 1027.


Home page
 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
E. Del Pezzo, F. Bianco, S. Petrosino, and G. Saccorotti
Changes in the Coda Decay Rate and Shear-Wave Splitting Parameters Associated with Seismic Swarms at Mt. Vesuvius, Italy
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004; 94: 439 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
T. Volti and S. Crampin
A four-year study of shear-wave splitting in Iceland: 2. Temporal changes before earthquakes and volcanic eruptions
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 212: 135 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]