Lyell Collection
Journal of the Geological Society
Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help

Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by GOSTIN, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 2000; v. 157; issue.4; p. 759-768
© 2000 Geological Society of London

Regular Article

Mantle plume uplift in the sedimentary record: origin of kilometre-deep canyons within late Neoproterozoic successions, South Australia

GEORGE E. WILLIAMS & VICTOR A. GOSTIN

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia (e-mail: george.williams{at}adelaide.edu.au)

Scientific editing by Sally Gibson.

In South Australia, canyons 200–250 km long are incised to depths of c. 1.5 km in late Neoproterozoic (after c. 590 Ma) marine deposits of the Adelaide fold belt and canyons 90 km long and 700 m deep occur in correlative marine strata of the Officer Basin 1000 km to the NW. In the Adelaide fold belt, the isotopic signature of limestone veneering canyon walls, canyon sinuosity and sedimentary structures in canyon fill suggest that the canyons were cut subaerially and filled by shallow-water marine deposits during coastal onlap. Eustacy cannot account for the kilometre-scale change in sea level required for subaerial canyon erosion and chemostratigraphy and the lack of evaporites at that stratigraphic level in southern Australia argue against a Messinian-style drawdown. In each region, uplift and crustal extension preceding or coeval with canyon incision are indicated by a regional unconformity, turbidite or mass-flow deposition, and extensional faults. These features and canyon incision may be explained by regional uplift above a rising mantle plume over a distance of >1000 km in southern Australia. Flood basalt volcanism in the Officer Basin tentatively dated at 563±40 Ma may have followed this uplift. Mantle plume uplift is expressed in the sedimentary record by emergent trends in facies, regional thinning, regional unconformities, turbidites, gravity slides, normal faults and incised canyons and palaeovalleys.


Keywords: Neoproterozoic, South Australia, canyons, uplift, plumes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GeologyHome page
L. M Glass and D. Phillips
The Kalkarindji continental flood basalt province: A new Cambrian large igneous province in Australia with possible links to faunal extinctions
Geology, 2006; 34: 461 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
N. Christie-Blick, N. CHRISTIE-BLICK, G.E. WILLIAMS, and V.A. GOSTIN
Discussion on mantle plume uplift in the sedimentary record: origin of kilometre-deep canyons within late Neoproterozoic successions, South Australia: Journal, Vol. 157, 2000, 759-768
Journal of the Geological Society, 2001; 158: 573 - 576.
[Full Text] [PDF]