|
Short Communication |
1 Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra Jaume Almera, c/LluÍs Solé i SabarÍs s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain (e-mail: dbrown@ija.csic.es)
2 Swedish Geological Survey, Box 670, 75128 Uppsala, Sweden
In order to determine which of the two conflicting models for the ascent of a granitic magma (diapiric rise, or along descrete pathways) may apply in any particular case it is important to see the crust through which the melt ascended. Reflection seismic data provides a means to do this. The URSEIS seismic profile images the 2D crustal profile from the surface outcrop of the Dzhabyk batholith to the upper mantle. The batholith is c. 5 km thick, and the crust beneath it shows continuous reflectivity to depths of 2035 km. The continuous reflectivity indicates the absence of a diapir tail, and suggests that melt ascent along descrete pathways was the more likely ascent mechanism in this case.
Keywords: Urals, melts, diapirs, dykes, seismic profiles.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Koenders and N. Petford Thermally induced primary fracture development in tabular granitic plutons: a preliminary analysis Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003; 214: 143 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||