Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cawood, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pisarevsky, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 2006; v. 163; issue.5; p. 753-759;
DOI: 10.1144/0016-76492005-126
© 2006 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Was Baltica right-way-up or upside-down in the Neoproterozoic?

Peter A. Cawood & Sergei A. Pisarevsky

Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia (e-mail: pcawood@tsrc.uwa.edu.au)

Baltica is a progeny of Rodinia, born from the breakup of the supercontinent in the Neoproterozoic. Within Rodinia, Baltica is generally placed adjacent to NE Laurentia but in a variety of configurations, which vary by up to 3000 km along the strike of the Laurentian margin and include both right-way-up and upside-down orientations (current coordinates). Geological and palaeomagnetic data show that the only viable reconstruction juxtaposes the western Scandinavian margin of Baltica, in its right-way-up orientation, against the Rockall–Scotland–SE Greenland segment of Laurentia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
R. D. Nance, J. B. Murphy, R. A. Strachan, J. D. Keppie, G. Gutierrez-Alonso, J. Fernandez-Suarez, C. Quesada, U. Linnemann, R. D'lemos, and S. A. Pisarevsky
Neoproterozoic-early Palaeozoic tectonostratigraphy and palaeogeography of the peri-Gondwanan terranes: Amazonian v. West African connections
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2008; 297: 345 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. A. Pisarevsky, J. B. Murphy, P. A. Cawood, and A. S. Collins
Late Neoproterozoic and Early Cambrian palaeogeography: models and problems
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2008; 294: 9 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ajsHome page
F. Corfu, R. J. Roberts, T. H. Torsvik, L. D. Ashwal, and D. M. Ramsay
Peri-Gondwanan elements in the Caledonian Nappes of Finnmark, Northern Norway: Implications for the paleogeographic framework of the Scandinavian Caledonides
Am J Sci, 2007; 307: 434 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
P. A. Cawood, A. A. Nemchin, R. Strachan, T. Prave, and M. Krabbendam
Sedimentary basin and detrital zircon record along East Laurentia and Baltica during assembly and breakup of Rodinia
Journal of the Geological Society, 2007; 164: 257 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]