Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.A.F.
Right arrow Articles by Imber, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 2007; v. 164; issue.6; p. 1187-1191;
DOI: 10.1144/0016-76492007-009
© 2007 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Using footwall structures to constrain the evolution of low-angle normal faults

S.A.F. Smith1, R.E. Holdsworth1, C. Collettini2 & J. Imber1

1 1Reactivation Research Group, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK (e-mail: steven.smith{at}durham.ac.uk)
2 2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy

Controversy exists over the presence of normal faults that initiate and slip at low angles (<30°). Evidence from the Zuccale Fault, which dips c. 15° east on the island of Elba, Italy, indicates that the early stages of low-angle faulting were synchronous with development of subsidiary high-angle footwall faults. These footwall structures controlled fault rock distribution and caused the development of flow folds similar to those produced in analogue studies of synchronous high- and low-angle faulting. The current configuration of footwall structures indicates that the Zuccale Fault cannot have originally dipped greater than c. 20° east, and represents a primary low-angle normal fault.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
C. Collettini, C. Viti, S. A.F. Smith, and R. E. Holdsworth
Development of interconnected talc networks and weakening of continental low-angle normal faults
Geology, 2009; 37: 567 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]