Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houston, J.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 2008; v. 165; issue.1; p. 291-306;
DOI: 10.1144/0016-76492007-022
© 2008 Geological Society of London

Original Article

Neogene sedimentary deformation in the Chilean forearc and implications for Andean basin development, seismicity and uplift

John Houston1, Dan Hart1,2 & Andrew Houston3

1 Nazca S.A., Los Conquistadores 1700, Of 23a, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile (e-mail: houston{at}entelchile.net)
2 Present address: Natural Resource Consulting Engineers, Inc., 131 Lincoln Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
3 20 Six Acres, Radbrook Green SY3 6AF, UK

Neogene sediments in the northern Chilean forearc display a wide range of near syndepositional structures. Analysis of the origin and distribution of these structures in space and time offers new insights into the development of the forearc basins. The structures are described in detail and show many features associated with soft-sediment deformation, pseudo-diapirism and slope failure. Synsedimentary deformation reached a peak in the Late Miocene to Early Pliocene while the sediments were saturated in a largely plastic state, and many of the structures were probably triggered by seismic shock. Late-stage tilting of the forearc generated shear stresses in the sediments leading to slumping and sliding. Base-level revision and drainage incision led to sediment bypass and cessation of lacustrine sedimentation that was not necessarily linked to climate change. Compaction and dewatering of the basins caused transition of the sediments from a plastic to a brittle state. The age and distribution of structures associated with seismicity appears to correlate with increasing subduction erosion and westward drift of South America but not with basin subsidence, shortening rates or plate convergence. This suggests that upper crustal deformation is at least partly decoupled from plate movement.