Lyell Collection

Journal of the Geological Society

Lyell Centre  |   Lyell Collection  |   Subscriptions   |   Geological Society  |   Email alerts  |   Online bookshop  |   Help


Keywords:
Author:
Advanced search>>
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pease, V.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Journal of the Geological Society; 2009; v. 166; issue.3; p. 517-527;
DOI: 10.1144/0016-76492008-093
© 2009 Geological Society of London

Research Article

Crustal affinities in the Arctic Uralides, northern Russia: significance of detrital zircon ages from Neoproterozoic and Palaeozoic sediments in Novaya Zemlya and Taimyr

V. Pease1 & R.A. Scott2

1 Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden
2 CASP, University of Cambridge, West Building, 181a Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DH, UK

*Corresponding author (e-mail: vicky.pease{at}geo.su.se)

U–Pb ion microprobe detrital zircon provenance investigations of pre-Mesozoic sediment samples from southern Novaya Zemlya and northern Taimyr, Arctic Russia, provide new constraints on the tectonic evolution of northern Eurasia. Sediments from both areas previously assigned a Neoproterozoic age are shown to be Palaeozoic (≤500 Ma), changing our understanding of the timing of tectonic events and their regional correlation. Samples from Novaya Zemlya provide an a priori Baltica signature, and dominant cumulative probability age peaks between 610 and 530 Ma are consistent with derivation from Timanide sources. Samples from northern Taimyr also contain the unique Timanian ’fingerprint' and are also inferred to be derived from the continental slope of northeastern Baltica, implying that the North Kara block was a part of Baltica in the early Palaeozoic. These data constrain the timing of deformation, metamorphism and development of an unconformity in southern Novaya Zemlya to a restricted period no earlier than late Cambrian–early Ordovician and at least 50 Ma after the peak Timanian event. The unconformity on Novaya Zemlya can be correlated in style and timing with an unconformity on Severnaya Zemlya and may record post-Timanian extensional collapse and onset of spreading in the Uralian Ocean.

Supplementary material: U–Th–Pb ion-microprobe analytical results are available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18340.