Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member type access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the Geological Society
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Journal of the Geological Society

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member type access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

The early Quaternary North Sea Basin

Rachel M. Lamb, Rachel Harding, Mads Huuse, Margaret Stewart and Simon H. Brocklehurst
Journal of the Geological Society, 175, 275-290, 1 November 2017, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2017-057
Rachel M. Lamb
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rachel.lamb@manchester.ac.uk
Rachel Harding
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Mads Huuse
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Stewart
2British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon H. Brocklehurst
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The onset of the Quaternary (2.58 Ma) corresponds to significant paleo-environmental events, such as the intensification and southward extension of Northern Hemisphere glaciation. In the North Sea Basin a significant late Cenozoic succession has been identified as a high-resolution archive of paleo-environmental changes during the Pliocene and Pleistocene. However, the identification of the base of the Quaternary has been a long-standing issue owing to lack of stratigraphic calibration. This study incorporates continuous, regional 3D seismic data with high-quality chronostratigraphic markers to map the base-Quaternary surface at high resolution across the entire North Sea. Depth conversion, backstripping, seismic geomorphology and sedimentation rate calculations are integrated to analyse the paleogeographical evolution of the North Sea Basin and its infill of c. 83 × 103 km3 of northward prograding marine to deltaic sediments. The basin is 600 km long from SSE to NNW and largely localized above residual topography of the Mesozoic graben system. During the earliest Quaternary (2.58 – 2.35 Ma) paleo-water depths were c. 300 ± 50 m and solid sedimentation rates (calculated from 0% porosity) c. 32 km3 ka−1. The base-Quaternary provides an important marker for further studies of the changing environment of the Quaternary of NW Europe as well as resource and shallow geohazard analysis.

Supplementary material: A base Quaternary two-way travel time structure map is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3900343

The onsets of cooling and widespread Northern Hemisphere glaciation at the Plio-Pleistocene transition are important markers for paleoclimate and paleo-environmental studies worldwide (Raymo 1994; Lisiecki & Raymo 2007). Climate records often vary strongly with latitude, and cooling trends such as the Plio-Pleistocene transition are often best preserved in mid- to high-latitude basins (Mudelsee & Raymo 2005; Rohling et al. 2012). In the North Sea Basin, a mid-latitude epicontinental basin, understanding the nature and extent of early Pleistocene cooling has previously been difficult owing to the poor definition and identification of the base Quaternary boundary. It has long been known that there is a considerable thickness (c. 1 km) of Quaternary deposits in the central North Sea (Holmes 1977; Cameron et al. 1987; Gatliff et al. 1994). However, the discrepancies among inconsistent lithostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic studies in the five bordering countries, combined with spatio-temporal changes in climate and sediment supply (Huuse 2002) and a strong glacial overprint, have impeded the accurate definition of the basal Quaternary (2.58 Ma) across the basin (Cameron et al. 1987).

Regional 3D seismic data acquired for deeper petroleum exploration have previously been used for glacial geomorphological studies on local to sub-regional scales (e.g. Praeg 1996, 2003; Kuhlmann & Wong 2008; Stewart & Lonergan 2011; Kristensen & Huuse 2012; Stewart et al. 2012, 2013; Moreau & Huuse 2014). The improved seismic resolution provided by these data has allowed previously hidden insights into the structure and stratigraphy of the Late Cenozoic succession. This study documents the shape and evolution of the earliest Quaternary North Sea Basin (2.58 – 2.35 Ma) through the integration of continuous, regional 3D seismic data with recent biostratigraphic studies from the southern North Sea. The Plio-Pleistocene boundary and sediment distribution patterns are accurately mapped across the entire central and southern North Sea for the first time. The newly mapped basin contains an expanded and largely complete record for paleoclimatological studies of the onset and history of glaciation in the Northern Hemisphere and will further contribute to an enhanced understanding of geohazards and resources constituted by shallow gas reservoirs.

Regional setting

The present-day North Sea is an epicontinental sea reaching average water depths of 100 m (outside the Norwegian Channel) and bordered by the NW European, Scandinavian and British landmasses. The North Sea Basin originated during episodic extensional rifting related to the unzipping of the Atlantic from the Paleozoic to the Early Cretaceous (Ziegler 1992). Rifting was followed by continuous subsidence throughout the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic punctuated by basin inversion episodes during the Paleogene (Ziegler 1992; White & Lovell 1997; Stoker et al. 2005). The role of continued regional and local tectonic activity into the late Cenozoic is still debated. Most evidence favours a model of passive thermal subsidence enhanced by sediment loading in the central North Sea and marginal uplift owing to denudation and unloading of the Norwegian landmass (Huuse 2002; Nielsen et al. 2009; Anell et al. 2010; Goledowski et al. 2012).

In previous studies of the central North Sea, the early Quaternary stratigraphy in the North Sea has been mapped as one unit, the Aberdeen Ground Formation, of pro-deltaic to marine sediments (Gatliff et al. 1994; Stoker et al. 2011). The sediment was mostly sourced from the Rhine–Meuse and Baltic river systems of northern Europe and Scandinavia (Bijlsma 1981; Overeem et al. 2001; Busschers et al. 2007). The timing of onset of glaciation in the Quaternary remains unclear, although there is growing evidence for several ice sheet advances during the Middle and Late Pleistocene, sourced from the UK and Scandinavian landmasses (Graham et al. 2011), and evidence for iceberg scouring even in the southern North Sea Basin since the onset of the Quaternary (Kuhlmann et al. 2006; Stuart & Huuse 2012; Dowdeswell & Ottesen 2013; Ottesen et al. 2014).

Data and methods

This study uses seismic stratigraphical and seismic geomorphological techniques (Mitchum et al. 1977a,b; Posamentier et al. 2007) to analyse a basin-scale 3D seismic dataset covering 128 000 km2 of the central and southern North Sea. The study uses the continuous PGS central and southern North Sea and 3D seismic MegaSurveys with a subsampled bin size of 50 m and a sampling rate of 4 ms two-way travel time (TWT) to map the deepest part of the Quaternary North Sea Basin (Fig. 1). In areas not covered by the MegaSurvey, regional 2D seismic lines were used to resolve the basin shape. In the top 1.5 s TWT, the vertical resolution of the MegaSurveys is 8 – 16 m, whereas the vertical resolution of the 2D lines is between 10 and 18 m with variable line spacing between 1 and 15 km. Lithological descriptions, gamma-ray logs and time–depth calibration curves were accessed from a regional database of both public and private domain data provided by TNO and TGS respectively.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Location map and datasets. Data shown are the PGS central North Sea and southern North Sea 3D seismic MegaSurveys, the TGS North Sea Renaissance 2D lines and the locations of the Josephine-1 and A15-03 wells used for dating of the basal Pleistocene. Bathymetry and topography data from Ryan et al. (2009). Location of Figures 2 and 6 seismic sections are indicated.

The base Quaternary stratigraphic surface, taken as 2.58 Ma, was correlated to a well-defined and continuous seismic reflection trough using the Dutch North Sea well A15-03, for which very detailed bio- and magneto-stratigraphic dating is available in the public domain (Kuhlmann et al. 2006; see discussion below). The horizon was picked at the well tie and then mapped down the depositional dip of the clinoforms into the basin, which minimized correlation errors to about half the dominant wavelength (20 – 35 m), using a diminishing grid size (200 m then 100 m then 50 m), which was then propagated in full three dimensions (Hart 1999). The base Quaternary was correlated and compared with the biostratigraphic record of the Josephine-1 well (Knudsen & Asbjörnsdóttir 1991), which is commonly used as a reference point for studies of the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) Quaternary (Fig. 2), as well as Cenozoic studies from the southern North Sea including those by Thöle et al. (2014) for the German sector and Nielsen et al. (2008) for the Danish sector (Table 1). The mapped horizon was converted to a gridded surface with a 100 m interval and seismic attributes such as instantaneous and root mean square (RMS) amplitudes were extracted across the horizon to investigate evidence for paleogeographical context using seismic geomorphology. To convert the surface from TWT to depth, calibrated TWT–depth data from 1122 wells from the UK and Norwegian North Sea were plotted to find a simple but robust depth conversion equation (equation (1)) with defined data variability (Fig. 3):Embedded Image (1)Subsidence owing to differential loading and compaction leads to exaggeration of clinoform slopes as maximum deposition occurs on the slope rather than the topsets. Therefore the time–depth conversion or thickness maps alone cannot accurately estimate paleo-water depth. To provide realistic water depth estimates from buried clinoforms, they need to be back-rotated so their topsets are approximately horizontal and their height is de-compacted (Pekar et al. 2000; Patruno et al. 2014).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Seismic section and line interpretation, at 75× vertical exaggeration, showing the location of Josephine-1 and A15-03 wells plus surfaces for the mid-Miocene (c. 17 – 14 Ma), 2.58 Ma (base Quaternary), 2.35, 1.9 and 1.1 Ma (base-Jaramillo paleomagnetic event). Key biostratigraphic events from Josephine-1 well identified after Knudsen & Asbjörnsdóttir (1991) with error range from depth conversion. Location is shown in Figure 1. FCO, first common occurrence; LCO, last common occurrence; LOD, last occurrence datum. Data courtesy of PGS.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Calibrated depth plotted against TWT for top 1.5 s TWT in 1122 wells across the UK and Norwegian sectors of the central North Sea MegaSurvey with regression line and R2 value for depth conversion as well as maximum error margins. Data courtesy of TGS.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Comparison of chronostratigraphic calibrations from five sectors of the North Sea, used in this study to identify the basal Quaternary surface

In this study, a series of transects representing the overall structure of the basin were identified for decompacting the sediment package and backstripping the clinoform heights. The sedimentary infill of the basin was first split into four seismic stratigraphic packages bounded by dated surfaces at 2.58, c. 2.35, 1.94, 1.1 and 0 Ma. The youngest or shallowest package (1.1 Ma to present day) was decompacted first along the chosen transects, using the decompaction equation of Allen & Allen (2013):Embedded Image (2)where y1 is the depth to the top of the sediment layer, y2 is the depth to the bottom of the sediment layer, Embedded Image is the depth to the top of the decompacted sediment layer, Embedded Image is the depth to the bottom of the decompacted sediment layer, ϕ0 is the porosity of the sediment at the surface and c is a constant that defines the curve representing the change of porosity with depth. The values for ϕ0 and c are taken from empirically derived values for sandy-shale lithology in the North Sea at 0.56 and 0.39 respectively (Allen & Allen 2013).

The decompacted package was then backstripped using a simple Airy isostasy model and the strata below were unloaded accordingly. The process was repeated with each of the successive packages, in turn restoring the early Quaternary surfaces and finally the base Quaternary surface to its approximate structure at 2.58 Ma. This backstripping method is simple and robust but does not account for complexities such as eustatic changes, flexural responses to the sediment load, or heterogeneity of sediment within the packages, and should be taken as a first-order estimate. Many of the parameters for modelling such complexities are either unrealistic at a basin-wide scale (e.g. because of local variations in sedimentology) or poorly constrained (e.g. the flexural rigidity of the lithosphere), making more detailed calculations beyond the scope of this paper.

Sedimentation rates for the Quaternary were calculated from sediment thickness maps between the four seismic stratigraphical packages (2.58 – 2.35, 2.35 – 1.94, 1.94 – 1.1 and 1.1 Ma to present day). The volume of the principal depocentre was found and then compacted to a solid sediment volume (0% porosity) based on a standard porosity depth curve from Marcussen et al. (2010). From the solid sediment volume the average sedimentation rate for each period was calculated in cubic kilometres per thousand years.

The strata immediately below the base Quaternary surface were interpreted with regard to the age of the subcrop to identify features influencing the evolution of the earliest Quaternary basin. The mapping of the subcrop followed a standard geological mapping process in which geological contacts between units in contact with the base Quaternary surface were mapped on regional seismic lines and then interpreted across the study area to form a complete map. Seven geological units were identified according to the seismic packages defined by Evans et al. (2003) and included Mesozoic, Paleocene, Eocene, Oligocene, lower Miocene, middle–upper Miocene and Pliocene.

Chronostratigraphic calibration

In seismic reflection data from the UK sector of the central North Sea, the 2.58 Ma base Quaternary is usually identified as either the ‘crenulated reflector’ (Holmes 1977; Gatliff et al. 1994; Stoker et al. 2011), which is not regionally extensive, or the southern North Sea regional unconformity. The southern North Sea unconformity changes into a correlative conformity along the Plio-Pleistocene clinoform slope. Cameron et al. (1987, p. 46) stated: ‘The base of the Quaternary is less easily identified in the centre of the North Sea Basin … The seismic boundary which we have used to define the base of the Quaternary offshore is almost certainly diachronous.’

Attempts at mapping into the UK sector from the Norwegian sector by Ottesen et al. (2014) identified the base Quaternary as equivalent to the base-NAUST at 2.7 Ma. This method correlated the two through the locally extensive unconformity at the top of the Upper Miocene to Lower Pliocene Utsira Formation, but this relationship assumes that middle to late Pliocene deposits are absent, which is not the case (Eidvin et al. 1999). Towards the southern half of the basin the Quaternary is preceded by an extensive Pliocene wedge (Cameron et al. 1992; Rasmussen et al. 2005; Thöle et al. 2014; Harding 2015; Table 1).

The identification of the basal Quaternary in the southern North Sea has been subject to recent integrated chronostratigraphy studies of the late Cenozoic. The chronostratigraphy of Kuhlmann et al. (2006) in Dutch exploration well A15-03 (55°18′N, 3°48′E; Fig. 1) can be correlated to the work of Köthe (2007, 2012) and Thöle et al. (2014) in the German sector of the North Sea, Nielsen et al. (2008) and Rasmussen et al. (2005) in the Danish sector, and Noorbergen et al. (2015) onshore Netherlands (Table 1; Harding 2015). The correlation provides a robust calibration across the topsets of the clinoform system, beyond the reach of the southern North Sea regional unconformity. The 2.58 Ma base Quaternary, as defined by Kuhlmann et al. (2006), is identified by an event in the pollen record that correlates with the climatic degradation at the Plio-Pleistocene transition, the paleomagnetic Gauss–Matuyama transition and the last occurrence of the benthic foraminifera species Monspeliensina pseudotepida (Table 1).

The extensive work on the southern North Sea has yet to be correlated northwards into the UK and Norwegian sectors of the North Sea; however, the agreement between multiple studies from across all three regions of the southern North Sea makes it a strong contender for solving the issues of mapping the basal Quaternary across the central North Sea. Correlating from the southern North Sea into the central North Sea involves mapping the clinoforms downdip in the direction of progradation into the basin, which reduces the risk of mapping errors, and allows correlation of the clinoform geometries to well log and core sample data in the central North Sea, notably the Josephine-1 well (56°36.11′N, 2°27.09′E; Fig. 1), which has a complete biostratigraphic record for benthic foraminifera species (Knudsen & Asbjörnsdóttir 1991). The correlation allows the M. pseudotepida event to be checked to ensure its preservation through mapping, within the depth conversion error range.

For comparison, the basal Quaternary as defined at Josephine-1 by Knudsen & Asbjörnsdóttir (1991) and correlated to the ‘crenulate reflector’ by Buckley (2012, 2017) using the first occurrence of benthic foraminifera species Cibicides grossus, was also mapped across the dataset. C. grossus was identified as a marker species for the North Sea by King (1983), who calibrated C. grossus and its related species Elphidiella hannai to the Gauss–Matuyama Reversal, and hence the 2.58 Ma boundary. The C. grossus event is known to be diachronous across the North Sea Basin owing to the depth dependence of the species but is still considered, in mid- to outer-neritic environments (i.e. the clinoform topsets of the southern North Sea) to correspond to the onset of the Quaternary (King 2016; Fig. 4). The C. grossus event mapped from the Josephine-1 well south towards A15-03, however, correlated more closely with a date of 1.94 Ma based solely on seismic geometries from the 3D mapping (Table 1; Figs 2 and 4). C. grossus was not present in A15-03 according to Kuhlmann et al. (2006). However, species such as Melonis affinis and Cassidulina species are observed in A15-03, which are known to exist in close association with C. grossus in the Danish offshore (Kuhlmann et al. 2006). The first common occurrence of E. hannai can also be used to define the interval in which C. grossus might be expected and is observed in A15-03 (King 1983; Table 1). The interval defined by these indicator species, in A15-03, corresponds to a date of c. 2.35 Ma, demonstrating the diachronous distribution of C. grossus (Table 1; Figs 2 and 4; Harding 2015).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Schematic illustration demonstrating the effect of rapid progradation during the earliest Quaternary on the distribution of depth-dependent benthic foraminifera species Cibicides grossus. (a) 2.58 Ma; C. grossus was not deposited in either well A15-03 or in Josephine-1. (b) 2.35 Ma; deposition of species closely related to C. grossus occurs in A15-03, indicating preferential depths for the species. (c) 1.94 Ma; progradation has extended significantly and deposition of C. grossus now occurs at Josephine-1 whereas A15-03 is close to or completely subaerial owing to infill of the basin.

It is likely that the difference between the C. grossus dates is due to the significant differences in water depth at the onset of the Quaternary across the basin. There is a north–south trend to the age of the first occurrence of C. grossus, which follows the progradation of the clinoforms and thus the progression of local water depths (Fig. 4). Thus, C. grossus is not considered to be a good marker for the basal Quaternary (King 2016). As the M. pseudotepida event is well preserved to the Josephine-1 borehole and correlated across the entire southern North Sea to the basal Quaternary, unlike C. grossus, this event was used to map the basal Quaternary across the rest of the basin for the first time (Figs 2 and 5).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Depth converted 2.58 Ma surface using velocity function derived in Figure 4. Contours are every 100 m. Locations of Josephine-1 and A15-03 wells, the seismic sections in Figures 2 and 6, transects for Figure 9i–iv and geomorphological features shown in Figure 11 are shown.

The early Quaternary North Sea Basin

Basin structure

The base Quaternary event defined in the southern North Sea has been mapped across the southern and central North Sea Basin and depth converted according to the borehole-derived velocity function provided above (Fig. 5). The base Quaternary follows the structural form of the underlying Mesozoic Central Graben, with a central basin trough that is elongated NW–SE until 57°30′N, where the northern portion of the trough switches to a NE–SW trend. The maximum depth of the base Quaternary is 1248 ms TWT (1230 m). The minimum depth along the basin axis is 812 ms (781 m), found in the northernmost part of the basin, where a relatively shallow connection exists into the northern North Sea and eventually the North Atlantic. The central basin trough has a maximum width of 130 km and axial length of about 600 km. This surface defines the complete Quaternary depocentre, apart from a thin veneer present beyond the flanks of the trough. The volume of sediment within the trough is c. 83 × 103 km3 (c. 40 × 103 km3 solid sediment volume, Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Average solid sedimentation rates for the Quaternary period (2.58 Ma to present); black line represents sedimentation during the periods 2.58 – 2.35 Ma, 2.35 – 1.94 Ma, 1.94 – 1.09 Ma and 1.09 Ma to present day; red line represents average sedimentation rate between 2.58 Ma and present day. Blue diamonds indicate the total solid sediment volume for each of the four time periods.

The base Quaternary surface overlies Pliocene sediments, in the main part of the Early Quaternary intra-shelf basin, as shown by the subcrop section and map (Figs 7 and 8). The Pliocene is characterized by an expansive clinoform set which prograded from the south and east into the basin (Figs 7 and 8). This clinoform set, known as the Southern North Sea Deltaic Formation (Cameron et al. 1992; Stoker et al. 2011) constitutes a significant shelf system which continues to prograde NW and north well into the Quaternary period (Sørensen et al. 1997; Overeem et al. 2001; Thöle et al. 2014, Harding 2015). To the north and east of the basin, the Quaternary sediments unconformably overlie older formations, principally the Late Miocene to Early Pliocene Utsira Formation but also older strata from most of the Cenozoic and into parts of the Mesozoic towards the basin margins, reflecting the overall basin structure and the basin-fill history (Figs 7 and 8).

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Seismic section showing interpretation of subcrop beneath the 2.58 Ma surface used to produce subcrop map (Fig. 8). Packages separated by age after Evans et al. 2003. (See Fig. 1 for location.) MMU, Mid-Miocene Unconformity. Data courtesy of TGS.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Simplified map of the base Quaternary subcrop indicating areas of sediment hiatus particularly on the western side of the basin. In the southern North Sea the subcrop becomes extremely complex owing to the presence of large-scale salt tectonic features, which heavily disturb the seismic reflection correlated to the base Quaternary. MMU, Mid-Miocene Unconformity.

Clinoform height

The mapped base Quaternary surface has been progressively backstripped to produce transects of the changing basin geometry and architecture through time (Fig. 9). These results for the southern (Fig. 9i), central (Fig. 9ii) and northern (Fig. 9iii and iv) parts of the basin are discussed below.

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Simplified sections from transects i–iv (locations shown in Fig. 5) used in the backstripping process; each point along the transect was used in the calculations and positioned according to distance along the transect. (a) Seismic data along the transect with current configuration of dated horizons, courtesy of PGS. (b) Simplified current configuration of dated horizons. (c) Burial history of the base Quaternary horizon. (d) The changing backstripped basin configuration through time.

Southern basin

The calculations indicate a maximum backstripped clinoform height at the onset of the Quaternary of 250 ± 50 m (Fig. 9i) in the southern part of the basin, although this reaches 300 ± 50 m away from the main transect. Between 2.58 and 2.35 Ma the southern clinoform set accumulated 480 ± 50 m of sediment as the clinoforms prograded 110 km westwards (Fig. 10), almost infilling the southernmost part of the basin by 2.35 Ma and resulting in a backstripped clinoform height of <20 m by 2.35 Ma. Progradation of the clinoforms follows this pattern with a progradation direction toward the SW until c. 2.35 Ma when the progradation direction of the southern clinoform set turns towards the NW (Figs 2 and 10a).

Fig. 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 10.

Present-day thickness maps of compacted Quaternary strata used to estimate sedimentation rates: (a) 2.58 – 2.35 Ma; (b) 2.35 – 1.94 Ma; (c) 1.94 – 1.09 Ma; (d) 1.09 Ma to present-day sea floor. Location of clinoform breakpoints at 2.58, 2.35 and 1.94 Ma is shown.

Central basin

The central part of the eastern clinoform set has an initial backstripped clinoform height of 200 m (Fig. 9ii) at the onset of the Quaternary. Between 2.58 and 2.35 Ma 70 m of sediment was accumulated (Figs 9ii and 10), producing a sigmoidal geometry with a backstripped clinoform height of 80 m. Progradation in the central part of the basin was in an eastwards direction, advancing to a maximum clinoform height of 50 m between 2.58 and 2.35 Ma.

Northern basin

The northern clinoform set consists of two parts, one to the NW and one to the NE (Fig. 9iii and iv); the northwestern part of the clinoform package is inherited from older Cenozoic clinoforms, which were not active during the earliest part of the Quaternary. Backstripped clinoform heights at the onset of the Quaternary are in the region of 110 m and remain so until after 2.35 Ma. To the NE, the clinoforms are flatter, almost horizontal, and form part of the shallow sill connecting the North Sea Basin to the North Atlantic. Here backstripped clinoform height is minimal at the onset of the Quaternary, increasing to 100 m by 2.35 Ma. The northern clinoforms do not prograde between 2.58 and 2.35 Ma.

Sedimentation and basin infill

Borehole lithological descriptions indicate that the late Pliocene and early Quaternary sediments of the North Sea consist of sequences of fine clay to silt with infrequent sands. Gamma log responses are found to be typical of mudstones (FMB v3.4 2014; 60 – 150 API; Rider 2002), in agreement with previous descriptions of the Quaternary Aberdeen Ground Formation as deltaic to marine muds (Cameron et al. 1987; Gatliff et al. 1994; Stoker et al. 2011). The sediment infill is observed to form three geographically separate clinoform sets of differing provenance, one to the south prograding first west and then NW, one to the east prograding westwards before merging with the southern set, and another to the NW, which progrades broadly southwards during the Quaternary. The clinoforms vary between high-angle (4 – 5°) sigmoidal or oblique reflections with well-defined break points, principally in the southern clinoform set between 2.58 and 2.35 Ma, to very low angle (<0.5°), in the northern clinoform set and in the southern set post-1.94 Ma (Fig. 9). Each clinoform represents a suite of paleo-environmental conditions, from the shallow shelf to the bathyal environment, with associated variations in sediment grain-size distribution (Posamentier & Allen 1993; Stuart & Huuse 2012; Patruno et al. 2014, 2015).

The three clinoform packages formed two main depocentres, with the southern and eastern clinoform packages sharing one extensive depocentre in the south and centre of the basin and the northern clinoform package consisting of a smaller depocentre to the north (Fig. 10). The northern depocentre was not active during the very earliest Quaternary (2.58 – 2.35 Ma; Table 1) and only began to show signs of deposition from 2.35 Ma, merging with the southern depocentre by 1.94 Ma (Fig. 10c). The southern depocentre covers an area of just over 6000 km2, defined by the 40 m thickness contour, with a solid sediment volume of over 7000 km3, giving an average sedimentation rate for the earliest Quaternary (2.58 – 2.35 Ma) of 31.6 km3 ka−1. In comparison, the entirety of the Quaternary saw an overall average sedimentation rate of 15.5 km3 ka−1 (between 2.58 Ma and present day), with rates of 11 km3 ka−1, 23.5 km3 ka−1 and 7.7 km3 ka−1 respectively for the periods of 2.35–1.94 Ma, 1.94–1.1 Ma and 1.1 Ma to present day (Fig. 6).

Paleogeography

Paleogeographical information is contained within borehole records of lithofacies and biostratigraphy coupled with seismic geomorphological evidence usually extracted from analysis of extractions of seismic attributes across the mapped surface. Features are interpreted relative to methods of formation and sorted by paleogeographical context; for example, slope channels (Fig. 11a) indicating modes of sediment distribution downslope.

Fig. 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 11.

(a) Seismic amplitude extraction of horizon within the earliest (2.58 – 2.35 Ma) Quaternary package in the southern North Sea showing downslope channels and fan deposits on the clinoform slopes and toesets. (b) Seismic amplitude extraction across base Quaternary (2.58 Ma) surface in the central North Sea showing elongate, semi-parallel furrows linked to deep-water processes.

In this study, seismic amplitude extractions of the base Quaternary surface reveal little evidence for slope features such as channels or basinal fans. Instead, the slopes of the base Quaternary surface are characterized by a relatively consistent, medium- to low-amplitude seismic facies with little evidence of facies changes between the roll-over and the slopes of the basal clinoform. The topsets of the clinoform package are typically strongly influenced by velocity effects from tunnel valleys in the overburden (Fig. 2a) or by survey imprints, although when clearly imaged in local areas the topsets do demonstrate a more chaotic seismic facies. Tunnel valleys are subglacial drainage conduits and are common in the Middle to Late Quaternary of the North Sea (Praeg 1996, 2003; Stewart & Lonergan 2011; Kristensen & Huuse 2012; Stewart et al. 2012, 2013; Moreau & Huuse 2014). Artefacts caused by tunnel valleys and survey imprints are relatively easily to detect by comparing reflection patterns through successive horizontal time slices, with systematically repeating patterns more likely to be artefacts. In vertical cross-sections, the topsets of the eastern clinoform package show small truncational depressions on the base Quaternary surface that are closely connected with a series of elongated, near-linear features with U-shaped cross-sections oriented broadly downslope in map and perspective views (Fig. 11b). The linear features imprint on the basal Quaternary surface in the deepest parts of the basin although they initially incise from a shallower horizon (Fig. 2). In comparison with the base Quaternary surface, horizons within the 2.58 – 2.35 Ma package show multiple preserved downslope channels and mass transport deposits on the slopes and toesets, principally in the southern portion of the Quaternary basin (e.g. Fig. 11a).

Discussion

Onset of the Quaternary

Structural mapping, backstripping calculations and seismic amplitude extractions of the basal Quaternary reflection reveal that the North Sea Basin, at the beginning of the Quaternary, consisted of an elongate basin, 600 km long, with maximum water depths in the region of 300 m. This basin is enclosed by the NW European landmasses on three sides, with a narrow marine connection to the north (Fig. 12). At the onset of the Quaternary the basin showed a distinct lack of slope features, such as mass transport deposits or downslope channels, with limited evidence for a change in facies between the topsets of the basin shelf and the slope. Mapping of the subcrop beneath the basal Quaternary horizon reveals a pattern of early Cenozoic sediments in the north and west of the basin gradually increasing in age towards the edge of the basin and forming an unconformity between the Quaternary basin infill and the older subcrop strata (Figs 7 and 8). Towards the south and east the slopes of the basin are formed of Pliocene clinoformal sediments and are conformable with the Quaternary basin infill (Figs 7 and 8). The primary reasons for the asymmetry in subcrop age relate to the regional structural controls of the underlying central graben and the eastern North Sea Basin offering greater accommodation to sediments supplied from around the basin and the relative sediment inputs through time between southern Norway, the Scottish mainland and NW Europe. These factors gave rise to the clockwise arrangement of clinoform breakpoints through the Cenozoic (e.g. Huuse et al. 2001), which set up the template on which the base Quaternary formed, with the southeastern part being a conformable continuation of the Neogene progradation from the Baltic region whereas the western and northern parts are characterized by greater hiati owing to erosion and onlap.

Fig. 12.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 12.

Reconstructed paleo-environmental map of 2.58 Ma North Sea based on results of this study, Overeem et al. (2001), McMillan et al. (2005), Busschers et al. (2007), Rose (2009) and Noorbergen et al. (2015). Large parts of the present-day North Sea would have been flooded under the highstand conditions at the onset of the Quaternary, creating a very shallow shelf, but were otherwise terrestrial.

The structure of the subcrop leads to an asymmetry in the age of the underlying sediments (Fig. 7), which is likely to have some influence on the compaction pattern of the Quaternary sediments. The Pliocene subcrop was deposited quickly, retaining the potential to compact under the Pleistocene load; however, the Mesozoic and Paleogene strata to the NW are exhumed and thus already compacted, with minimal potential for further compaction. Late Cenozoic Zechstein salt diapirs are observed to have deformed pre-Quaternary sediments, resulting in elevation of Mesozoic to Late Permian deposits to the base or even into the fill of the Quaternary North Sea Basin (Figs 7, 8 and 11b). The shallow sill to the north coincides with an area where the relatively narrow South Viking Graben has been overfilled by Tertiary sediments, leaving a relatively narrow and shallow seaway between the broader and comparatively under-filled Central Graben and North Viking Graben (Ziegler 1992).

The observations of the North Sea Basin, as it was at the onset of the Quaternary, are found to be in agreement with a number of other early Quaternary paleo-environmental studies. Thickness maps of Quaternary sediments have previously identified the elongate depocentre (e.g. Holmes 1977; Cameron et al. 1987; Gatliff et al. 1994), although its true shape is only now revealed because of the much greater density of seismic data used in this study. Biostratigraphic studies and clinoform geometries reported in previous more localized studies suggest paleo-water depths of 100 – 300 m in the deepest part of the basin (e.g. Overeem et al. 2001; Huuse 2002; Kuhlmann 2004; King 2016), in agreement with the present study. The lack of slope features on the basal Quaternary surface, as well as limited evidence for extensive facies change between the topset and the slope, is suggestive of the sediment source for the clinoforms being located a significant distance from the clinoform break point (Posamentier & Vail 1988; Mulder & Alexander 2001; Mulder et al. 2003). If the delta is a significant distance from the slope breakpoint then coarser material does not as easily reach the slope, limiting facies changes between topsets and slope, and reducing the possibility of slope feature formation (Posamentier & Vail 1988). This interpretation of the observations is supported by the onshore stratigraphy from southeastern Britain, which suggests that the basal Quaternary was deposited in a shallow-marine environment (McMillan et al. 2005; Rose 2009), and a peak in sea-level observed at 2.58 Ma in the global sea-level curve (Miller et al. 2011), suggesting a flooding event at the onset of the Quaternary. This flooding surface is observed in studies of seismic stratigraphy in the Dutch sector southern North Sea at the top of the MIS 103 interglacial, marked by a large transgression within the seismic geomorphology and a marked shift in the depocentre (Funnell 1996; Harding 2015). A significant flooding event at the onset of the Quaternary created an extensive shallow marine environment on the shelf (clinoform topset), possibly as shallow as 20 m water depth, increasing sharply at the clinoform breakpoint of the shelf prism into the elongate basin (Fig. 12).

Earliest Quaternary (2.58 – 2.35 Ma)

Observations of the earliest Quaternary package from structural and seismic amplitude mapping, backstripping and calculations of sedimentation rates show a different picture to conditions at the Pliocene–Pleistocene boundary. During the earliest Quaternary, the extent of the basin long axis was reduced by over 100 km, primarily as a result of infill of the basin from the south and rapid northwards progradation of clinoform packages (Fig. 10). This progradation is highlighted in the sedimentation rates for this period, with the main depocentre for the earliest Quaternary lying in the south of the basin and low to no sedimentation in the north of the basin (Fig. 10). On the NW slopes of the basin older, remnant, clinoform packages from earlier Cenozoic depositional systems existed but were not active during 2.35 – 2.58 Ma (Fig. 10). Backstripping calculations also reflect the disparate sedimentation and infill of the basin, with the basin occupying the present-day southern North Sea being almost completely infilled by 2.35 Ma, leaving water depths of less than 50 m (Fig. 9i). In comparison, towards the northern end of the basin, the clinoforms either do not change in height, or marginally increase in height during the earliest Quaternary (Fig. 9iii and iv). Finally, unlike the basal Quaternary horizon, throughout the 2.58 – 2.35 Ma package, mass transport deposits, slope channels and fans are present on the southern clinoform slope, although not on the northern slopes (e.g. Fig. 11).

These observations fit with the general model of fluvial input into the North Sea during the early Quaternary and late Cenozoic. Evidence from the southern North Sea and from onshore NW Europe indicates that the dominant river systems during this time were the Baltic (Bijlsma 1981) and Rhine–Meuse (Busschers et al. 2007) river systems, which fed into the North Sea from Denmark, northern Germany and the Netherlands respectively (Fig. 12). The two river systems drained large areas of northern Europe during this time, including the Fennoscandian shield, the Baltic platform and large areas of NW Europe from the Alps to the present-day mouth of the Rhine (Overeem et al. 2001; Busschers et al. 2007). This drainage pattern would cause the high sedimentation rate in the south and the low sedimentation rate to the north, as the southwards drainage pattern of the Fennoscandian shield into the Baltic river systems bypasses the northern part of the basin. This bypass of the northern basin during the earliest Quaternary means that any correlation between the Norwegian and North Sea depositional systems, such as that presented by Ottesen et al. (2014), is difficult to test using the present-day distribution of high-quality chronostratigraphic calibrations. The two depocentres could, in fact, indicate completely separate depositional systems: one preserving solely the Scandinavian climate signal from the western coast of Norway, which drained into the northern North Sea, and the other the Northern European signal, or a mixed signal, from eastern Norway draining into the Baltic river system, routed through the southern clinoform set. Rapid northward progradation during this part of the early Quaternary has been noted in the southern North Sea previously, and has been linked with climatic cooling and increased sediment supply owing to glacial activity in the sediment source areas (Overeem et al. 2001; Huuse 2002).

The disparate sedimentation rates between north and south are highlighted in the backstripping results, which indicate that sedimentation rate must have far outstripped the formation of accommodation space by subsidence in the south of the basin during the earliest Quaternary (Fig. 9). Subsidence owing to loading is a continuous process, allowing far more sediment to be deposited in a depocentre than the initial accommodation space, and in a basin fully adjusted for isostasy it is not uncommon for up to three times the initial accommodation to be accumulated (Sclater & Christie 1980; Allen & Allen 2013). In the southern end of the basin, however, with an initial water depth of c. 300 m, only 350 m of sediment accumulated to fill the earliest Pleistocene accommodation. This part of the basin fill is a direct continuation of the rapid progradation that filled in the southeastern North Sea Basin during the post-middle Miocene (Clausen et al. 1999; Harding 2015). It is thus likely that flexural loading by the Pliocene clinoforms may have already preloaded this part of the basin, thus limiting the vertical isostatic component.

Additional to this the North Sea is noted to have been influenced by large-scale ice sheets at various points during the Quaternary (Graham et al. 2011, and references therein). Ice sheets are known to have an impact on isostasy both through the loading of the ice sheet itself (James & Bent 1994; Klemann & Wolf 1998; Davis et al. 1999; James et al. 2000; Stewart et al. 2000) and the changes to groundwater conditions affecting compaction of sediment (Boulton & Dobbie 1993; Sættem et al. 1996; Piotrowski & Kraus 1997; O'Regan et al. 2010, 2016). The effects of changes to groundwater drainage under a significant ice load can result in strongly differential compaction. Over-consolidation of sediment is common in glacially loaded regions, as the weight of the ice forces dewatering and effective stress increases dramatically (Boulton & Dobbie 1993; Sættem et al. 1996; Piotrowski & Kraus 1997; O'Regan et al. 2010, 2016). However, restricted meltwater discharge has been known to cause excess pore pressures and thus under-consolidation of sediment, particularly in fast-moving ice (Boulton & Dobbie 1993; Sættem et al. 1996; Piotrowski & Kraus 1997; O'Regan et al. 2010, 2016). There are very limited data available on how deep the compaction effects of glacial loading can penetrate into the substrate. Isostatic loading from an ice sheet is equally complex, with vertical and horizontal stresses placed on the strata even well beyond the extent of the ice sheet. Although modern postglacial rebound models, constrained by field-based investigations, have improved greatly over the years they are reliant on knowing the extent and thickness of the ice sheet in question (James & Bent 1994; Klemann & Wolf 1998; Davis et al. 1999; James et al. 2000; Stewart et al. 2000), for which the data are truly available only in the North Sea for the last glacial maximum (Huuse & Lykke-Andersen 2000; Graham et al. 2011). Additionally, modern rebound models may not fully account for the cumulative effect of repeated glaciations, which the North Sea is known to be subject to (Klemann & Wolf 1998; Stewart et al. 2000). With a limited understanding of ice extents prior to the last glacial maximum and lacking any direct measurements of potential over- or under-consolidation the impact of glacial loading on the Quaternary stratigraphy remains uncertain.

The presence of slope fan deposits and downslope channels on the slopes of the southern clinoforms during the 2.58 – 2.35 Ma package are typical of a shelf system in which material is transported to the shelf break. Coarser material remains on the topsets, forming a delta system, whereas finer sediment is carried down the slope by strong downslope currents into the basin (Posamentier & Vail 1988; Cartwright 1995; Mulder & Alexander 2001; Mulder et al. 2003). The elongate U-shaped features seen incising into the basal Quaternary in the central part of the basin are a particularly notable example of this process, and are interpreted as troughs formed by strong downslope currents under the high influx of sediment-laden water; that is, turbidites (Cartwright 1995; Lamb et al. 2017). These observations fit with the interpretation of the North Sea as a highly dynamic basin during the earliest Quaternary.

Implications

The mapping of the basal Quaternary surface and analysis of the earliest Quaternary sedimentary package define an expanded mid-latitude record of global climatic cooling. The onset of the Quaternary saw much of the shallow shelf flooded; however, the majority of deposition occured within the early Quaternary North Sea Basin. Rapid sediment deposition during the earliest Quaternary in the southern part of the basin caused both infill of the basin and differential subsidence, reducing accommodation in the south while maintaining accommodation towards the north, driving the depocentre northwards. This north–south deposition pattern allowed a significant thickness of Quaternary sediments to build up, leading to a thick and laterally expanded sedimentary succession of 1.2 km for the entire Quaternary and almost 600 m for the earliest Quaternary across the entire North Sea Basin. By correlating chronostratigraphic studies from the southern North Sea into the central North Sea and mapping continuously in full three dimensions this study provides a powerful chronostratigraphic calibration for the early Quaternary. If this base-Quaternary surface is combined with analysis of seismic geomorphology and drilling of the marine toesets from the rapidly prograding southern clinoform system, one of the most complete and detailed mid-latitude paleoclimate records for the early Quaternary could be produced.

In addition to the interpretations of the paleo-environmental record, the structural map of the basal Quaternary horizon can be combined with backstripping calculations to create a proxy that represents the pre-glacial paleobathymetry of the North Sea, which is one of the more poorly defined boundary conditions in ice sheet modelling (Peltier 1994). The Base Quaternary surface mapped here at 50 × 50 m resolution across the entire Quaternary North Sea Basin provides a uniform framework horizon that highlights the diachroneity of some previous correlations based on seismic facies or perceived stratal relations. The continuously mapped surface should thus help constrain future assessments of shallow geohazards and shallow gas resources in the North Sea Basin.

Conclusion

The basal Quaternary surface (2.58 Ma) has been mapped across the central and southern North Sea through the integration of chronostratigraphic studies with basin-wide 3D seismic data. The surface defines a highly elongate Quaternary depocentre comprising some 83 × 103 km3 of sediments deposited in an elongated semi-enclosed deep marine basin with paleowater depths throughout the early Quaternary of up to 300 ± 50 m. Based on facies analysis and seismic geomorphological analysis it is suggested that the marine basin was initially flooded at the onset of the Quaternary but during the first 230 kyr was strongly influenced by a high sediment input from Northern Europe. The high sediment input created a dynamic and rapidly changing paleo-environment dominated by turbidites, channels and fans as well as shelf-margin deltas. Under this high sediment supply regime the basin shape changed dramatically during the first 230 kyr of the Quaternary, leading to the near-infill of the southern North Sea by 2.35 Ma. Estimates of sedimentation rates suggest a maximum sedimentation rate of over 30 km3 ka−1 for the earliest Quaternary. The map of the base Quaternary and the early Pleistocene depocentre define a record of preserved paleoclimate information reaching up to 1.2 km thickness, which has implications for further study of the paleoclimate evolution of the Plio-Pleistocene transition, shallow geohazard analysis and resource assessments.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank PGS, particularly S. Morse and R. Lamb, for providing the central and southern North Sea MegaSurveys; TGS for providing 2D North Sea Renaissance seismic lines and well data through their Facies Map Browser; IHS for Kingdom software; and Schlumberger for the donation of Petrel software. Thanks go to S. Patruno for his invaluable advice on the backstripping process, and to C. King for sharing his insights on the biostratigraphy of the North Sea. Finally we thank the reviewers for their thorough and helpful comments, which led to a much improved paper.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge NERC and BUFI in conjunction with Forewind for supporting this work through R.L.’s NERC CASE studentship at the University of Manchester, and the British Geological Survey (No. A87604X).

  • © 2018 The Author(s)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)

References

  1. ↵
    1. Allen, P. &
    2. Allen, J.
    2013. Basin Analysis: Principles and Applications, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  2. ↵
    1. Anell, I.,
    2. Thybo, H. &
    3. Stratford, W.
    2010. Relating Cenozoic North Sea sediments to topography in southern Norway: The interplay between tectonics and climate. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 300, 19–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Bijlsma, S.
    1981. Fluvial sedimentation from the Fennoscandian area into the North-West European basin during the late Cenozoic. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 60, 337–345.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Boulton, G.S. &
    2. Dobbie, K.E.
    1993. Consolidation of sediments by glaciers: relations between sediment geotechnics, soft-bed glacier dynamics and subglacial ground-water flow. Journal of Glaciology, 39, 26–44.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Buckley, F.A.
    2012. An Early Pleistocene grounded ice sheet in the Central North Sea. In: Huuse, M., Redfern, J., Le Heron, D.P., Dixon, R.J., Moscariello, A. & Craig, J. (eds) Glaciogenic Reservoirs and Hydrocarbon Systems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 368, 185–209, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP368.8
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Buckley, F.A.
    2017. A glaciogenic sequence from the Early Pleistocene of the Central North Sea. Journal of Quaternary Science, 32, 145–168.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Busschers, F.S.,
    2. Kasse, C. et al.
    2007. Late Pleistocene evolution of the Rhine–Meuse system in the southern North Sea basin: imprints of climate change, sea-level oscillation and glacio-isostacy. Quaternary Science Reviews, 26, 3216–3248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Cameron, T.D.J.,
    2. Stoker, M.S. &
    3. Long, D.
    1987. The history of Quaternary sedimentation in the UK sector of the North Sea Basin. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 144, 43–58, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.144.1.0043
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Cameron, T.D.J.,
    2. Crosby, A.,
    3. Balson, P.S.,
    4. Jeffery, D.H.,
    5. Lott, G.K.,
    6. Bulat, J. &
    7. Harrison, D.J.
    1992. United Kingdom offshore regional report: the geology of the southern North Sea. HMSO for the British Geological Survey, London.
  10. ↵
    1. Cartwright, J.
    1995. Seismic-stratigraphical analysis of large-scale ridge–trough sedimentary structures in the Late Miocene to Early Pliocene of the central North Sea. In: Plint, A.G. (ed.) Sedimentary Facies Analysis: A Tribute to the Research and Teaching of Harold. G. Reading, Special Publication of International Association of Sedimentologists, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, 22, 285–303.
  11. ↵
    1. Clausen, O.R.,
    2. Gregersen, U.,
    3. Michelsen, O. &
    4. Sørensen, J.C.
    1999. Factors controlling the Cenozoic sequence development in the eastern parts of the North Sea. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 156, 809–816, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.156.4.0809
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Davis, J.L.,
    2. Mitrovica, J.X.,
    3. Scherneck, H.-G. &
    4. Fan, H.
    1999. Investigations of Fennoscandian glacial isostatic adjustment using modern sea level records. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 2733–2747.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Dowdeswell, J.A. &
    2. Ottesen, D.
    2013. Buried iceberg ploughmarks in the early Quaternary sediments of the central North Sea: A two-million year record of glacial influence from 3D seismic data. Marine Geology, 344, 1–9.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Eidvin, T.,
    2. Riis, F. &
    3. Rundberg, Y.
    1999. Upper Cainozoic stratigraphy in the central North Sea (Ekofisk and Sleipner fields). Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 79, 97–128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Evans, D.,
    2. Graham, C.,
    3. Armour, A. &
    4. Bathurst, P.
    (eds) 2003. The Millennium Atlas: Petroleum Geology of the Central and Northern North Sea. Geological Society, London.
  16. ↵
    1. Funnell, B.M.
    1996. Plio-Pleistocene palaeogreography of the southern North Sea Basin (3.75–0.60 Ma). Quaternary Science Reviews, 15, 391–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Gatliff, R.W.,
    2. Richards, P.C. et al.
    1994. United Kingdom offshore regional report: the geology of the central North Sea. HMSO for the British Geological Survey, London.
  18. ↵
    1. Goledowski, B.,
    2. Nielsen, S.B. &
    3. Clausen, O.R.
    2012. Patterns of Cenozoic sediment flux from western Scandinavia. Basin Research, 24, 377–400.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Graham, A.G.C.,
    2. Stoker, M.S.,
    3. Lonergan, L.,
    4. Bradwell, T. &
    5. Stewart, M.A.
    2011. The Pleistocene glaciations of the North Sea basin. In: Ehlers, J., Gibbard, P.L. & Hughes, P.D. (eds), Quaternary glaciations: extent and chronology: a closer look. Developments in Quaternary Science 15, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 261–278.
  20. ↵
    1. Harding, R.
    2015. Evolution of the Giant Southern North Sea Shelf-Prism: Testing sequence stratigraphic concepts and the global sea level curve with full-three dimensional control. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
  21. ↵
    1. Hart, BS.
    1999. Definition of subsurface stratigraphy, structure and rock properties from 3-D seismic data. Earth-Science Reviews, 47, 189–218.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Holmes, R.
    1977. Quaternary deposits of the central North Sea 5. The Quaternary geology of the UK sector of the North Sea between 56° and 58°N. Report of Institute of Geological Sciences, 77/14.
  23. ↵
    1. Huuse, M.
    2002. Cenozoic uplift and denudation of southern Norway: insights from the North Sea Basin. In: Doré, A.G., Cartwright, J.A., Stoker, M.S., Turner, J.P. & White, N. (eds) Exhumation of the North Atlantic Margin: Timing, Mechanisms and Implications for Petroleum Exploration. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 196, 209–233, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2002.196.01.13
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Huuse, M. &
    2. Lykke-Andersen, H.
    2000. Overdeepened Quaternary valleys in the eastern Danish North Sea: morphology and origin. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19, 1233–1253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Huuse, M.,
    2. Lykke-Andersen, H. &
    3. Michelsen, O.
    2001. Cenozoic evolution of the eastern Danish North Sea. Marine Geology, 177, 243–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. James, T.S. &
    2. Bent, A.L.
    1994. A comparison of eastern North American seismic strain-rates to glacial rebound strain-rates. Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 2127–2130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. James, T.S.,
    2. Clague, J.J.,
    3. Wang, K. &
    4. Hutchinson, I.
    2000. Postglacial rebound at the northern Cascadia subduction zone. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19, 1527–1541.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. King, C.
    1983. Cainozoic micropalaeontological biostratigraphy of the North Sea. Institute of Geological Sciences, Report, 82/7.
  29. ↵
    1. King, C.
    2016. A revised correlation of Tertiary rocks in the British Isles and adjacent areas of NW Europe. A.S. Gale & T.L. Barry (eds). Geological Society, London, Special Reports, 27.
  30. ↵
    1. Klemann, V. &
    2. Wolf, D.
    1998. Modelling of stresses in the Fennoscandian lithosphere induced by Pleistocene glaciations. Tectonophysics, 294, 291–303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Knudsen, K.L. &
    2. Asbjörnsdóttir, L.
    1991. Plio-Pleistocene foraminiferal stratigraphy and correlation in the central North Sea. Marine Geology, 101, 113–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Köthe, A.
    2007. Cenozoic biostratigraphy from the German North Sea sector (G-11-1 borehole, dinoflagellate cysts, calcareous nannoplankton). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 158, 287–327.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Köthe, A.
    2012. A revised Cenozoic dinoflagellate cyst and calcareous nannoplankton zonation for the German sector of the southeastern North Sea Basin. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 45, 189–220.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Kristensen, T.B. &
    2. Huuse, M.
    2012. Multistage erosion and infill of buried Pleistocene tunnel valleys and associated seismic velocity effects. In: Huuse, M., Redfern, J., Le Heron, D.P., Dixon, R.J., Moscariello, A. & Craig, J. (eds) Glaciogenic Reservoirs and Hydrocarbon Systems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 368, 159–172, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP368.15
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Kuhlmann, G.
    2004. High resolution stratigraphy and paleoenvironmental changes in the southern North Sea during the Neogene: An integrated study of Late Cenozoic marine deposits from the northern part of the Dutch offshore area. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
  36. ↵
    1. Kuhlmann, G. &
    2. Wong, T.E.
    2008. Pliocene paleoenvironment evolution as interpreted from 3D-seismic data in the southern North Sea, Dutch offshore sector. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 25, 173–189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Kuhlmann, G.,
    2. Langereis, C.G.,
    3. Munsterman, D.,
    4. van Leeuwen, R.-J.,
    5. Verreussel, R.,
    6. Meulenkamp, J.E. &
    7. Wong, T.E.
    2006. Integrated chronostratigraphy of the Pliocene–Pleistocene interval and its relation to the regional stratigraphical stages in the southern North Sea region. Netherlands Journal of Geoscience, 85, 29–45.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Lamb, R.M,
    2. Huuse, M. &
    3. Stewart, M.
    2017. Early Quaternary sedimentary processes and palaeoenvironments in the central North Sea. Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 32, 127–144.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Lisiecki, L.E. &
    2. Raymo, M.E.
    2007. Plio-Pleistocene climate evolution: trends and transitions in glacial cycle dynamics. Quaternary Science Reviews, 26, 56–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Marcussen, Ø,
    2. Faleide, J.I.,
    3. Jahren, J. &
    4. Bjørlykke, K.
    2010. Mudstone compaction curves in basin modelling: a study of Mesozoic and Cenozoic sediments in the northern North Sea. Basin Research, 22, 324–340.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. McMillan, A.A.,
    2. Hamblin, R.J.O. &
    3. Merritt, J.W.
    2005. An overview of the lithostratigraphical framework for the Quaternary and Neogene deposits of Great Britain (onshore). British Geological Survey Research Report, RR/04/04.
  42. ↵
    1. Miller, K.G.,
    2. Mountain, G.S.,
    3. Wright, J.D. &
    4. Browning, J.V.
    2011. A 180-million-year record of sea level and ice volume variations from continental margin and deep-sea isotopic records. Oceanography, 24, 40–53.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Mitchum, R.M., Jr.,
    2. Vail, P.R. &
    3. Thompson, S., III.
    . 1977a. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, Part 2: The depositional sequence as a basic unit for stratigraphic analysis. In: Payton, C.E. (ed.) Seismic Stratigraphy – Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration. AAPG Memoirs, 26, 53–62.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Mitchum, R.M., Jr.,
    2. Vail, P.R. &
    3. Thompson, S., III..
    1977b. Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level, Part 6: Stratigraphic interpretation of seismic reflection patterns in depositional sequences. In: Payton, C.E. (ed.) Seismic Stratigraphy – Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration. AAPG Memoirs, 26, 117–133.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Moreau, J. &
    2. Huuse, M.
    2014. Infill of tunnel valleys associated with landward-flowing ice sheets: The missing Middle Pleistocene record of the NW European rivers? Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15, 1–9.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Mudelsee, M. &
    2. Raymo, M.E.
    2005. Slow dynamics of the Northern Hemisphere glaciation. Palaeoceanography, 20, PA4022.
  47. ↵
    1. Mulder, T. &
    2. Alexander, J.
    2001. The physical character of subaqueous sedimentary density flows and their deposits. Sedimentology, 48, 269–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Mulder, T.,
    2. Syvitski, J.P.M.,
    3. Migeon, S.,
    4. Faugères, J.-C. &
    5. Savoye, B.
    2003. Marine hyperpycnal flows: initiation, behaviour and related deposits. A review. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 20, 861–882.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Nielsen, T.,
    2. Mathiesen, A. &
    3. Bryde-Auken, M.
    2008. Base Quaternary in the Danish parts of the North Sea and Skagerrak. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin, 15, 37–40.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Nielsen, S.B.,
    2. Gallagher, K. et al.
    2009. The evolution of western Scandinavian topography: A review of Neogene uplift versus the ICE (isostasy–climate–erosion) hypothesis. Journal of Geodynamics, 47, 72–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Noorbergen, L.J.,
    2. Lourens, L.J.,
    3. Munsterman, D.K. &
    4. Verreussel, R.M.C.H.
    2015. Stable isotope stratigraphy of the early Quaternary of borehole Noordwijk, southern North Sea. Quaternary International, 386, 148–157.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. O'Regan, M.,
    2. Jakobsson, M. &
    3. Kirchner, N.
    2010. Glacial geological implications of overconsolidated sediments on the Lomonosov Ridge and Yermak Plateau. Quaternary Science Reviews, 29, 3532–3544.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. O'Regan, M.,
    2. Greenwood, S.L.,
    3. Preto, P.,
    4. Swärd, H. &
    5. Jakobsson, M.
    2016. Geotechnical and sedimentary evidence for thick-grounded ice in southern Lake Vättern during deglaciation. GFF, 138, 355–366.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Ottesen, D.,
    2. Dowdeswell, J.A. &
    3. Bugge, T.
    2014. Morphology, sedimentary infill and depositional environments of the Early Quaternary North Sea Basin (56°–62°N). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 56, 123–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. Overeem, I,
    2. Weltje, G.J.,
    3. Bishop-Kay, C. &
    4. Kroonenberg, S.B.
    2001. The Late Cenozoic Eridanos delta system in the Southern North Sea Basin: a climate signal in sediment supply? Basin Research, 13, 293–312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Patruno, S.,
    2. Hampson, G.J.,
    3. Jackson, C.A.-L. &
    4. Whipp, P.S.
    2014. Quantitative progradation dynamics and stratigraphic architecture of ancient shallow-marine clinoform sets: a new method and its application to the Upper Jurassic Sognefjord Formation, Troll Field, offshore Norway. Basin Research, 1–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12081
  57. ↵
    1. Patruno, S.,
    2. Hampson, G.J. &
    3. Jackson, C.A-L.
    2015. Quantitative characterisation of deltaic and subaqueous clinoforms. Earth-Science Reviews, 142, 79–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Pekar, S.F.,
    2. Miller, K.G. &
    3. Kominz, M.A.
    2000. Reconstructing the stratal geometry of latest Eocene to Oligocene sequence in New Jersey; resolving a patchwork distribution into a clear pattern of progradation. Sedimentary Geology, 134, 93–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Peltier, W.R.
    1994. Ice Age paleotopography. Science, 265, 195–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Piotrowski, J.A. &
    2. Kraus, A.M.
    1997. Response of sediment to ice-sheet loading in northwestern Germany: effective stresses and glacier-bed stability. Journal of Glaciology, 43, 495–502.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Posamentier, H.W. &
    2. Allen, G.P.
    1993. Variability of the sequence stratigraphic model: effects of local basin factors. Sedimentary Geology, 86, 91–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Posamentier, H.W. &
    2. Vail, P.R.
    1988. Eustatic controls on clastic deposition II – sequence and systems tract models. In: Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S., Posamentier, H., Van Wagoner, J., Ross, C.A. & Kendall, C.G.St.C. (eds) Sea-Level Changes – An Integrated Approach. SEPM Special Publications, 42, 125–154.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Posamentier, H.W.,
    2. Davies, R.J.,
    3. Cartwright, J.A. &
    4. Wood, L.
    2007. Seismic geomorphology – an overview. In: Davies, R.J., Posamentier, H.W., Wood, L.J. & Cartwright, J.A. (eds) Seismic Geomorphology: Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 277, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.277.01.01
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    1. Praeg, D.
    1996. Morphology, stratigraphy and genesis of buried mid-Pleistocene tunnel-valleys in the southern North Sea basin. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
  65. ↵
    1. Praeg, D.
    2003. Seismic imaging of mid-Pleistocene tunnel-valleys in the North Sea Basin – high resolution from low frequencies. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 53, 273–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Rasmussen, E.S.,
    2. Vejbæk, O.V.,
    3. Bidstrup, T.,
    4. Piasecki, S. &
    5. Dybkjær, K.
    2005. Late Cenozoic depositional history of the Danish North Sea Basin: implications for the petroleum systems in the Kraka, Halfdan, Siri and Nini fields. In: Doré, A.G. & Vining, B.A. (eds) Petroleum Geology: North-West Europe and Global Perspectives – Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference. Geological Society, London, 1347–1358, https://doi.org/10.1144/0061347
  67. ↵
    1. Raymo, M.E.
    1994. The initiation of Northern Hemisphere glaciation. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 22, 353–383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. Rider, M.H.
    2002. The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs, 2nd edn. Rider–French Consulting, Rogart.
  69. ↵
    1. Rohling, E.J.,
    2. Medina-Elizalde, M.,
    3. Shepherd, J.G.,
    4. Siddal, M. &
    5. Stanford, J.D.
    2012. Sea surface and high-latitude temperature sensitivity to radiative forcing of climate over several glacial cycles. Journal of Climate, 25, 1635–1656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    1. Rose, J.
    2009. Early and Middle Pleistocene landscapes of eastern England. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 120, 3–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  71. ↵
    1. Ryan, W.B.F.,
    2. Carbotte, S.M. et al.
    2009. Global Multi-Resolution Topography synthesis. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 10, Q03014, https://www.marine-geo.org/tools/maps_grids.php
  72. ↵
    1. Sættem, J.,
    2. Rise, L.,
    3. Rokoengen, K. &
    4. By, T.
    1996. Soil investigations, offshore mid Norway: A case study of glacial influence on geotechnical properties. Global and Planetary Change, 12, 271–285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    1. Sclater, J.G. &
    2. Christie, P.A.F.
    1980. Continental stretching: an explanation of the post-mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the central North Sea basin. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85, 3711–3739.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Sørensen, J.C.,
    2. Gregersen, U.,
    3. Breiner, M. &
    4. Michelsen, O.
    1997. High-frequency sequence stratigraphy of Upper Cenozoic deposits in the central and southeastern North Sea areas. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 14, 99–123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  75. ↵
    1. Stewart, M.A. &
    2. Lonergan, L.
    2011. Seven glacial cycles in the middle–late Pleistocene of northwest Europe: Geomorphic evidence from buried tunnel valleys. Geology, 39, 283–286.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Stewart, I.S.,
    2. Sauber, J. &
    3. Rose, J.
    2000. Glacio-seismotectonics: ice sheets, crustal deformation and seismicity. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19, 1367–1389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    1. Stewart, M.,
    2. Lonergan, L. &
    3. Hampson, G.
    2012. 3D seismic analysis of buried tunnel valleys in the Central North Sea: tunnel valley fill sedimentary architecture. In: Huuse, M., Redfern, J., Le Heron, D.P., Dixon, R.J., Moscariello, A. & Craig, J. (eds) Glaciogenic Reservoirs and Hydrocarbon Systems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 368, 173–184, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP368.9
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Stewart, M.A.,
    2. Lonergan, L. &
    3. Hampson, G.
    2013. 3D seismic analysis of buried tunnel valleys in the central North Sea: morphology, cross-cutting generations and glacial history. Quaternary Science Reviews, 72, 1–17.
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Stoker, M.S.,
    2. Praeg, D. et al.
    2005. Neogene evolution of the Atlantic continental margin of NW Europe (Lofoten Islands to SW Ireland); anything but passive. In: Doré, A.G. & Vining, B. (eds) Petroleum Geology: North-West Europe and Global Perspectives – Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference. Geological Society, London, 1057–1076, https://doi.org/10.1144/0061057
  80. ↵
    1. Stoker, M.S.,
    2. Balson, P.S.,
    3. Long, D &
    4. Tappin, D.R.
    2011. An overview of the lithostratigraphical framework for the Quaternary deposits on the United Kingdom continental shelf. British Geological Survey Research Report, RR/11/03.
  81. ↵
    1. Stuart, J.Y. &
    2. Huuse, M.
    2012. 3D seismic geomorphology of a large Plio-Pleistocene delta – ‘Bright spots’ and contourites in the Southern North Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 38, 143–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  82. ↵
    1. Thöle, H.,
    2. Gaedicke, C.,
    3. Kuhlmann, G. &
    4. Reinhardt, L.
    2014. Late Cenozoic sedimentary evolution of the German North Sea? A seismic stratigraphical approach. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 47, 299–329.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. White, N. &
    2. Lovell, B.
    1997. Measuring the pulse of a plume with the sedimentary record. Nature, 387, 888–891.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    1. Ziegler, P.A.
    1992. North Sea rift system. Tectonophysics, 208, 55–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the Geological Society: 175 (2)
Journal of the Geological Society
Volume 175, Issue 2
March 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

The early Quaternary North Sea Basin

Rachel M. Lamb, Rachel Harding, Mads Huuse, Margaret Stewart and Simon H. Brocklehurst
Journal of the Geological Society, 175, 275-290, 1 November 2017, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2017-057
Rachel M. Lamb
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rachel.lamb@manchester.ac.uk
Rachel Harding
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mads Huuse
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret Stewart
2British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon H. Brocklehurst
1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

The early Quaternary North Sea Basin

Rachel M. Lamb, Rachel Harding, Mads Huuse, Margaret Stewart and Simon H. Brocklehurst
Journal of the Geological Society, 175, 275-290, 1 November 2017, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2017-057
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Journal of the Geological Society article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The early Quaternary North Sea Basin
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the Geological Society
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of the Geological Society.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Regional setting
    • Data and methods
    • Chronostratigraphic calibration
    • The early Quaternary North Sea Basin
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Funding
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • New sequence stratigraphic framework on a ‘passive’ margin: implications for the post-break-up depositional environment and onset of glaciomarine conditions in NE Greenland
  • Tectonic significance of the Variscan suture between Brunovistulia and the Bohemian Massif
  • Sedimentology and provenance of the Lower Old Red Sandstone Grampian outliers: implications for Caledonian orogenic basin development and the northward extension of the Midland Valley Basin
Show more: Research article
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Geological Society of London Scientific Statement: what the geological record tells us about our present and future climate
  • The Nonesuch Formation Lagerstätte: a rare window into freshwater life one billion years ago
  • The Shibantan Lagerstätte: insights into the Proterozoic–Phanerozoic transition
  • Linking surface and subsurface volcanic stratigraphy in the Turkana Depression of the East African Rift system
  • Terrestrial stratigraphical division in the Quaternary and its correlation
More...

Journal of the Geological Society

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
0016-7649
Online ISSN 
2041-479X

Copyright © 2021 Geological Society of London