Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member type access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the Geological Society
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Journal of the Geological Society

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member type access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

The Schilfsandstein and its flora; arguments for a humid mid-Carnian episode?

View ORCID ProfileM. Franz, View ORCID ProfileE. Kustatscher, C. Heunisch, S. Niegel and H.-G. Röhling
Journal of the Geological Society, 176, 133-148, 4 October 2018, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2018-053
M. Franz
1Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universität Göttingen, Abteilung Angewandte Geologie, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Franz
  • For correspondence: mfranz1@gwdg.de
E. Kustatscher
2Museum of Nature South Tyrol, Bindergasse/via Bottai 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
3Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany
4Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Kustatscher
C. Heunisch
5Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Niegel
1Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universität Göttingen, Abteilung Angewandte Geologie, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
H.-G. Röhling
5Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Recently intensified research on the mid-Carnian episode stimulated discussions about the mid-Carnian climate and a supposed humid climate shift. This basin-scale study on the Schilfsandstein, the type-example of the mid-Carnian episode, applied sedimentological, palynological and palaeobotanical proxies of the palaeoclimate to a large dataset of cored wells and outcrops. The results demonstrate the primary control of circum-Tethyan eustatic cycles on the Central European Basin where transgressions contributed to basin-scale facies shifts. The palaeoclimate proxies point to a uniform arid to semi-arid Carnian climate with low chemical weathering and high evaporation. Consequently, transgressions into the Central European Basin led to increased evaporation forcing the hydrological cycle. The increased runoff from source areas resulted in high-groundwater stages on lowlands characterized by hydromorphic palaeosols and intrazonal vegetation with hygrophytic elements. During lowstands, reduced evaporation and runoff led to increased drainage and desiccation of lowlands characterized by formation of vertisols, calcisols and gypsisols and zonal vegetation with xerophytic elements. The proposed model of sea-level control on the hydrological cycle integrates coeval and subsequent occurrences of wet and dry lowlands, hydromorphic and well-drained palaeosols, and intrazonal and zonal vegetations. Thus, the Schilfsandstein does not provide arguments for a humid mid-Carnian episode.

Supplementary material: Datasets of Palynomorph Eco Group (PEG) and Macroplant Eco Group (MEG) analyses are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4182593

The Schilfsandstein represents the type-example of a mid-Carnian episode of increased siliciclastic influx to Tethyan and peri-Tethyan basins and beyond (see reviews by Arche & López-Gómez 2014; Ogg 2015; Ruffell et al. 2015, and references therein). Since the proposal of a ‘Carnian Pluvial Event’ by Simms & Ruffell (1989) and the following rejection by Visscher et al. (1994), numerous studies have contributed to an increased knowledge (Dal Corso et al. 2018).

Here, the descriptive term mid-Carnian episode is used collectively for various phenomena that occurred in the late Julian to early Tuvalian substages, such as sea-level fluctuations (e.g. Brandner 1984; Bechstädt & Schweitzer 1991; Aigner & Bachmann 1992; Gianolla et al. 1998; Franz et al. 2014) and related oceanographic responses (e.g. Keim et al. 2001, 2006; Hornung et al. 2007a, b; Gattolin et al. 2013, 2015), biotic turnovers of marine organisms (e.g. Simms & Ruffell 1989; Erba 2004; Rigo et al. 2007; Balini et al. 2010; Preto et al. 2010; Martinez-Perez et al. 2014), volcanism (Furin et al. 2006; Greene et al. 2010; Dal Corso et al. 2012; Xu et al. 2014), climate change (Roghi et al. 2010; Stefani et al. 2010; Trotter et al. 2015; Mueller et al. 2016a, b; Sun et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2017) and carbon-cycle perturbations (Dal Corso et al. 2012, 2015; Mueller et al. 2016a, b; Sun et al. 2016; Miller et al. 2017). These phenomena have been reviewed in detail by Arche & López-Gómez (2014), Ogg (2015), Ruffell et al. (2015) and Dal Corso et al. (2018).

Concerning its significance for the mid-Carnian climate, the Schilfsandstein is still a subject of discussion. Simms & Ruffell (1989), Mader (1990) and Fijałkowska-Mader (1999) reconstructed a pronounced pluvial event, Nitsch (2005) and Kozur & Bachmann (2010) argued for a rather wet phase, whereas Visscher & Van der Zwan (1981), Reitz (1985), Visscher et al. (1994), Kelber (1998), Heunisch (1999) and Franz et al. (2014) rejected significant climate changes. These inconsistencies may result from the fact that previous studies employed only individual palaeoclimate proxies and/or were limited to certain areas of the Central European Basin.

This paper presents results of the first integrated study employing compositional maturity, palaeosols, macroflora and palynoflora of the Schilfsandstein as climate proxies. Of special importance is the extensive dataset employed herein of the Schilfsandstein macroflora, one of the most famous and important floras of the Germanic Triassic (e.g. Schenk 1864; Schönlein & Schenk 1865; Sandberger 1882; Frentzen 1922a, b, 1930–31; Mader 1990; Kelber & Hansch 1995). The Schilfsandstein takes its name from the cane- or rush-like structures of the horsetail stems that are often preserved in situ in the rocks. The agglomeration of groups of stems of Equisetites arenaceus of up to 25 cm in diameter give, thus, the impression of a fossil reed bed (Frentzen 1930–31).

Methods and database

The study is based on 17 cored wells and 19 outcrops of the Schilfsandstein, which have been measured and lithostratigraphically classified according to Beutler in DSK (2005) and Franz et al. (2014, 2018a). The consecutive analysis of lithofacies types, facies associations and depositional environments followed Shukla et al. (2010) and Franz et al. (2014). Palaeosols were described and classified according to Mack et al. (1993). The results obtained were compared with published and unpublished data for 10 wells and two outcrops (Fig. 1). Wells and outcrops were sampled for granulometry, detrital mineralogy, geochemistry and palynology. For grain-size analyses, 87 samples were sieved with standard mesh sieves according to DIN 66165. Granulometric values, such as the median grain size, were calculated according to Folk & Ward (1957). For petrography and diagenesis of sandstones, 98 thin sections were investigated by means of transmitted light, scanning electron microscope–energy-dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDX) and cathodoluminescence microscopy. The quantitative detrital mineralogy was estimated from point counting; results were classified following Pettijohn (1957) and McBride (1963).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Upper Triassic palaeogeography of the Central European Basin according to Ziegler (1990) with wells and outcrops referred to as in the text; hatched area indicates maximum extension of Neubrandenburg Member (pre-Schilfsandstein transgression); EAS, Altmark-Eichsfeld Swell; ECG, East Carpathian Gate; LFS, Lolland-Falster Swell; RS, Rügen Swell; SMG, Silesian-Moravian Gate; inset shows late Triassic global palaeogeography (Stampfli, unpublished) with the Central European Basin (CEB) and basins referred to as in the text: NCA, Northern Calcareous Alps; IP, Iberian Plate (several basins); PB, Paris Basin; modified from Franz et al. (2014). Cored wells, present study: 1, Kb Barth 6A/65; 2, Kb Goritz 1/62; 3, Klütz; 4, Lütow; 5, Kb Wolgast 1A/63; 6, Kb Tarnow At 1/65; 7, Gt Neubrandenburg 2/85; 8, Kb KSS 1/66; 9, Kb Brustorf 1/62; 10, Kb Gartz 1/65; 11, Kb Strausberg 1/63; 12, Ketzin; 13, Dp Morsleben 52A/95; 14, Kb Burg M 2/61; 15, Kb Schillingstedt 1/64; 16, TB Obernsees 1; 17, W Medbach. Cored or logged wells cited herein: 18, K 5-1; 19, Ückeritz; 20, Angermünde; 21, Nidzica IG 1; 22, Wągrowiec IG 1; 23, Płońsk IG 2; 24, Ośno IG 2; 25, Ksiąz Wlkp IG 2; 26, Sulechów IG 1; 27, Woźniki K1. Outcrops, present study: 1, Sehnde; 2, Großmonra; 3, Altengottern; 4, Gispersleben; 5, Ilversgehofen; 6, Eyershausen; 7, Zeil am Main; 8, Gochsheim; 9, Iphofen; 10, Sinsheim; 11, Eppingen; 12, Sulzfeld; 13, Eberstadt; 14, Heilbronn; 15, Kleinheppach; 16, Stuttgart; 17, Feuerbacher Heide; 18, Leonberg; 19, Sulz am Neckar. Outcrops cited herein: 20, Gaildorf; 21, Basel Neuewelt.

For geochemical characterization, 335 samples of the Morsleben 52A well, 64 samples of the Neubrandenburg 2 well and 62 samples of the Apolda 1 well were analysed by means of inorganic and organic geochemical methods. Samples from the Morsleben 52A well were measured at the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources Hannover (Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, BGR). Preparation and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements followed standard procedures already described by Franz et al. (2014). Samples from the Neubrandenburg 2 and Apolda 1 wells were processed at ALS Laboratories Galway (Ireland). Carbon and sulphur were determined by combustion furnace and acid digestion, major elements and base metals by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES; LiBO2 fusion, four acid digestion), and trace elements and REE by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; LiBO2 fusion).

More than 900 plant macrofossils of the Schilfsandstein were integrated into a macroflora dataset. This comprehensive dataset comprises previously published specimens (e.g. Bronn 1851–52; Schenk 1864; Chroustchoff 1868; Sandberger 1882; Engel 1896; Frentzen 1922a, 1930–31; Roselt 1952–53; Kelber & Hansch 1995) as well as all the plant remains from the Schilfsandstein studied in various European museums (e.g. NBC (Leiden), Utrecht University, NNMP (Prague), NRM (Stockholm), NHMW (Vienna), SMNS (Stuttgart), BSPG (Munich), Tübingen University and MfN (Berlin); see Supplementary material for details). The localities mentioned in the literature and on the labels of the fossils were corrected and standardized, and the stratigraphic attributions were checked as much as possible. The determinations were, at genus level, reviewed for this paper.

For the Schilfsandstein palynoflora dataset, previously published data for the Sehnde outcrop (see Heunisch in Beutler et al. 1996), and Neubrandenburg 2 and Morsleben 52A wells (see Franz et al. 2014) were re-evaluated and new data for the Obernsees 1 (two samples) and Medbach wells (three samples) were added. Details of the preparation of samples and application of the Palynomorph Eco Group (PEG) method (sensu Paterson et al. 2017) to the Schilfsandstein palynoflora were given by Franz et al. (2014).

Stratigraphic control

According to Beutler in DSK (2005), the informal term Schilfsandstein was replaced by the formal term Stuttgart Formation. In the northern Central European Basin, the Stuttgart Formation is composed of the sandy Lower and Upper Schilfsandstein members and the predominantly shaly Neubrandenburg, Gaildorf and Beaumont members (Franz et al. 2014). The base of the Stuttgart Formation is drawn at the base of the Neubrandenburg Member and the top of the formation is drawn at the base of the Beaumont Member (Weser Formation). Detailed descriptions of the Stuttgart Formation in the North German Basin have been provided by Beutler & Häusser (1982), Franz (2008), Barnasch (2010) and Franz et al. (2014, 2018a). In the southern Central European Basin, the presence of the Neubrandenburg Member cannot be demonstrated so far. Therefore, the base of the formation is drawn at the base of the Lower Schilfsandstein (Fig. 2). Detailed descriptions of the Stuttgart Formation in the southern Central European Basin have been provided by Schröder (1977), DSK (2005) and Kozur & Bachmann (2010).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Sequence-stratigraphic scheme linking discontinuous successions of South Germany to continuous successions of North Germany. Locations of wells and outcrops are shown in Figure 1: outcrops Basel and Gaildorf (Etzold & Bläsi 2000; Etzold & Schweizer 2005; Seegis 2005a, b), outcrops Heilbronn and Iphofen (Bachmann & Wild 1976; present study), Obernsees 1 and Medbach wells (present study), Schillingstedt 1 well (Kozur 1970a; present study), outcrop Sehnde (Beutler et al. 1996; present study), Morsleben 52A and Ketzin wells (Franz et al. 2014; present study), Angermünde well (Kahlert et al. 1970), Tarnow 1, Neubrandenburg 2, Brustorf 1 and Ückeritz wells (Kozur 1970b; Franz et al. 2014; this work), K 5-1 well (unpublished core report); mfs, maximum flooding surface; mrs, maximum regression surface.

Biostratigraphic control on the Stuttgart Formation is provided by conchostracans, ostracods and palynomorphs (Heunisch 1999; Kozur & Bachmann 2010; Kozur & Weems 2010). In particular, the ostracod assemblage of the Neubrandenburg Member allows time-constrained correlation (Kozur & Bachmann 2010; Franz et al. 2014). Based on biostratigraphic arguments, the Stuttgart Formation was correlated with the late Julian upper Austrotrachyceras austriacum zone (Bachmann & Kozur 2004; Kozur & Bachmann 2010). Based on sequence-stratigraphic arguments, Franz et al. (2014) suggested that the Stuttgart Formation may range into the early Tuvalian. The time-spans, estimated to be about 0.8 myr for the Stuttgart Formation (Kozur & Bachmann 2010) and about 1.2 myr for the mid-Carnian episode (Zhang et al. 2015; Miller et al. 2017), are in general agreement.

The Schilfsandstein (Stuttgart Formation)

Eustatic control

The record of the pre-, intra- and post-Schilfsandstein transgressions allows the time-constrained north–south correlation of continuous successions of the basin centre and discontinuous successions of the southern Central European Basin (Franz et al. 2018a). The architecture of transgressive shales and progradational clastic deposits provides evidence for the primary control of mid-Carnian sea-level cycles on the Stuttgart Formation (Aigner & Bachmann 1992; Köppen 1997; Shukla & Bachmann 2007). Based on correlations with Tethyan examples, Franz et al. (2014) reconstructed a set of circum-Tethyan fourth-order transgressive–regressive (T–R) sequences.

The pre-Schilfsandstein transgression, representing the most distinct transgression of the Lower and Middle Keuper in the North German Basin, triggered the fundamental facies shift from shaly–evaporitic lithologies of the Grabfeld Formation to shaly–sandy lithologies of the Stuttgart Formation. Resulting from this transgression of the first fourth-order T–R sequence, dark shales and silts of a marine–brackish inland sea and associated coastal environments covered larger parts of the Central European Basin. Following the maximum extension of the inland sea, the falling sea-level allowed the basin-wards progradation of the fluvio-deltaic Lower Schilfsandstein (Fig. 2; Gajewska 1973). Active fluvial channel belts were flanked and delta lobes were at least partly covered by vegetated wetlands in which remnants of the Schilfsandstein macro- and palynoflora could be preserved. Avulsion of channels and abandonment of delta lobes led to drainage, desiccation, pedogenesis and decomposition of macro- and palynofloral remains. The maximum regression is reflected by the maximum basin-wards progradation of the Lower Schilfsandstein corresponding to a pedogenic maximum in some localities. The following second fourth-order T–R sequence resulted in the repetition of the depositional theme of transgressive shales and progradational clastic deposits (Gaildorf Member, Upper Schilfsandstein).

Granulometry, detrital and authigenic mineralogy of sandstones

The median grain sizes (Folk & Ward 1957) of 87 samples of the Lower and Upper Schilfsandstein range from 2.1 to 4.2 Phi. According to Wentworth (1922), 24 samples are classified as fine sand, 53 samples as very fine sand and 10 samples as coarse silt. Samples from channel fills, proximal crevasse splays and sheetsands are characterized by coarser grain sizes whereas samples from levees, distal crevasse splays and sheetsands as well as wetlands are characterized by finer grain sizes. Thus, lateral facies shifts and associated changes from bedload to suspension-load processes are considered responsible for these grain-size variations.

Detrital grains of proximal and distal samples are of low to moderate sphericity and subangular to subrounded grain shape (Wentworth 1922). Resulting from this uniform low textural maturity, a downstream trend towards a more accentuated roundness in the basin centre is not indicated.

The compositional maturity of the Schilfsandstein is remarkably low. According to Pettijohn (1957), the mineralogical maturity indices of 98 samples range from 0.2 to 1.4. Following McBride (1963), six samples are classified as arkose, 86 as lithic arkose and five as feldspathic litharenites (Fig. 3). In individual samples, feldspar has a range of 24.4–68.5%, quartz has a range of 17.4–58.8% and lithic fragments have a range of 3.9–42.3% of all detrital grains identified to feldspar, quartz and lithic fragments. The feldspar assemblage is dominated by untwinned and twinned plagioclase with lesser K-feldspar. The quartz assemblage is dominated by monocrystalline quartz followed by polycrystalline quartz followed by chert. The assemblage of lithics is composed of metamorphic rock fragments, mainly schists and gneisses, and igneous rock fragments outweighing rock fragments of sedimentary sources.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Detrital mineralogy revealing low compositional maturity of the Schilfsandstein. (a) Ternary plot (McBride 1963) of 98 samples investigated herein in comparison to previously published examples; Q, mono- and polycrystalline quartz and chert; F, feldspar; L, lithic fragments (unstable rock fragments). Black circle and arrow, sample 11-11 of the Wolgast 1A/65 well (c–h); blue circle and arrow, sample 12-17 of the Gartz 1/65 well (i); red circle and arrow, sample 11-12 of the Brustorf 1/62 well (j). (b) Mineralogical maturity index (Pettijohn 1957) v. provenance index (Pettijohn 1957) of the Schilfsandstein in comparison with Paleozoic to Mesozoic sandstones of the North German Basin; modified from Franz et al. (2018b). (c) Thin-section overview of sample 11-11 of the Wolgast 1A/65 well, showing low compositional maturity with abundant greenish–brownish lithic fragments and dark heavy minerals; Q, 30.0%; F, 35.5%; L, 34.5%, median grain size 2.3 Phi (Folk & Ward 1957); scale bar represents 0.5 cm, parallel Nicols. (d, e) Detail of (c) showing detrital plagioclase (F) with authigenic overgrowth of K-feldspar (arrow); scale bar represents 100 µm; (d) parallel Nicols; (e) crossed Nicols. (f–h) Detail of (c) with quartz (Q), feldspar (F), lithic fragments (L) and mica (M), authigenic feldspar overgrowth (black arrows) and Fe-rich dolomite cement (white arrow); scale bar represents 100 µm; (f) parallel Nicols; (g) crossed Nicols; (h) cathodoluminescence. (i) SEM image of sample 12-17 of the Gartz 1/65 well, pore-filling authigenic kaolinite booklets; Q, 49.6%; F, 28.0%; L, 22.4%; median grain size 2.9 Phi (Folk & Ward 1957); scale bar represents 50 µm. (j) SEM image of sample 11-12 of the Brustorf 1/62 well, authigenic overgrowth of idiomorph analcime crystals; Q, 29.0%; F, 40.8%; L, 30.2%; median grain size 2.1 Phi (Folk & Ward 1957); scale bar represents 50 µm.

The detrital mineralogy, in particular the abundance of lithic fragments, seems to be grain-size dependent. An increase of grain size corresponds to an increased abundance of lithic fragments. Within fine-grained samples, the lowered abundance of lithic fragments is balanced by increased abundances of quartz and feldspar. Interestingly, the detrital mineralogy is obviously not related to transport distances, as a downstream increase of compositional maturity could not be observed. Likewise, in situ feldspar weathering is not indicated, as feldspar ratios of pedogenic sandstones are not systematically lowered (Fig. 3).

Intense burial diagenesis is witnessed by corrosion of and authigenic overgrowth on detrital grains and authigenic cementation of open intergranular pore space. Detrital feldspars range from apparently unaltered to almost completely corroded but, important to note, unaltered to slightly altered feldspar grains predominate. Lithic fragments, such as quartz, are only subordinately affected by alteration. Authigenic quartz and feldspars occur as overgrowths on detrital quartz and feldspar grains. Pedogenic sandstones show hematite and clay mineral overgrowth on practically all detrital grains. Open pore space is partly to completely filled with nests of small euhedral analcime crystals or larger poikilotopic patches as well as larger patches of calcite, dolomite, anhydrite and gypsum. Authigenic clay minerals are mainly represented by illite/smectite and chlorite, and less abundantly by kaolinite (Fig. 3).

Palaeosols

The distribution of palaeosol orders is clearly related to depositional environments. Protosols and spodosols sensu Mack et al. (1993) were frequently observed throughout the Stuttgart Formation (Table 1). Histosols sensu Mack et al. (1993) occur mainly in the Neubrandenburg Member but are sparse above. Vertisols, calcisols and gypsisols sensu Mack et al. (1993) occur from the Lower Schilfsandstein upwards.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Overview of palaeosol classes of the Schilfsandstein in the Central European Basin.

A typical feature is the formation of a hydromorphic palaeosol (protosol or gleysol) during early pedogenesis followed by overprint to a vertisol, calcisol or gypsisol owing to increased drainage, desiccation and evaporation (Fig. 4; Nitsch 2005; present study). According to basin topography, the earliest calcisols and gypsisols were formed in well-drained floodplains of the Lower Schilfsandstein in South and Central Germany. For the less well-drained basin centre, these palaeosol types are proven for the Upper Schilfsandstein (Fig. 2).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Outcrop example of Upper Schilfsandstein palaeosols at Gispersleben (Thuringia). (a) Overview with litholog showing stacked sheetsands with protosols in the lower part and mature vertisols above. In the upper part (above 50 cm), individual palaeosols were initially formed as gleysols, followed by an overprint to calcic vertisols. (b) Disrupted root traces with haloes in destratified red shales. (c) Reddish hematite nodule; the faintly horizontal lamination of the lower greyish part (black arrow) should be noted. (d) Columnar carbonate nodule. In (b)–(d) scale bar represents 10 cm.

Histosols are associated with floodplain wetlands flanking fluvial channels and delta plain wetlands of the Neubrandenburg Member and Lower Schilfsandstein (Fig. 2). All observed cases of histosols were characterized by remarkably thin coaly horizons not exceeding 20 cm thickness. At many localities, only one histic horizon of a few centimetres thickness was evolved. At only a few localities, for example the Neubrandenburg 2 well, several thin histic horizons were evolved but occurred in a narrow interval of less than 4 m thickness (Franz et al. 2014). Moreover, the outcrop example Am Hohnert showed that Schilfsandstein histosols are laterally restricted.

Spodosols sensu Mack et al. (1993) are recognized by reddish to violet spodic horizons, which are a typical feature of sand-prone successions of crevasse splays and sheetsands. These horizons formed from subsurface illuviation of iron oxides and/or iron hydroxides resulting in impregnation of sandstones (Mack et al. 1993). Because of this, iron oxides and/or iron hydroxides form ferritic cutans, spots, irregular nests or nodules, or may accentuate bedding structures. The spodosols observed herein lack clear evidence of illuviation of organic matter. This may result from alteration of illuvial organic matter during burial diagenesis and/or erosion of Bh horizons owing to truncation of palaeosols as already noted by Nitsch (2005). Vertisols occur at distal floodplains and abandoned delta lobes of the Lower Schilfsandstein and practically throughout the Upper Schilfsandstein. In the Lower Schilfsandstein, the occurrence of vertic horizons is limited to the upper part. In contrast to this, stacked vertic horizons may dominate the complete succession of the Upper Schilfsandstein. The occurrence of calcisols and gypsisols largely follows this pattern. In particular, shaly successions of the Upper Schilfsandstein comprise stacked calcisols and/or gypsisols and therefore resemble much the Weser Formation above (Figs 5 and 6).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Outcrop and core examples of Schilfsandstein palaeosols. (a) Calcisol at Altengottern (Thuringia, Upper Schilfsandstein) with vertical columnar carbonate nodules (arrows) and large horizontal carbonate nodules (encircled) in destratified shales; hammer marks the palaeosol top; scale bar is 2 m long. (b) Stacked sheetsands with vertic gypsisols in the Neubrandenburg 2 well, depth in metres refers to drillers depth. Boxes I–III show the upper part of a sheetsand characterized by partly destratified red shales with deep desiccation cracks (black arrows). Gypsum occurs as fillings of desiccation cracks and displacive nodules and columns (white arrows); the upward-increasing size of nodules should be noted. Boxes IV and V show the lower part of the next sheetsand (base marked by white line) composed of greenish sandstone and partly destratified red shales with gypsum nodules (white arrows).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Schilfsandstein palaeosols in the North German Basin, for the example of the Morsleben 52A well. Floodplain fines material of stacked sheetsands was modified to spodosols and calcic–gypsic vertisols in the Lower Schilfsandstein and spodosols, calcisols and gypsisols in the Upper Schilfsandstein.

The Schilfsandstein macroflora

Most plant remains available in collections were recovered in Schilfsandstein quarries of South Germany (see Kelber & Hansch 1995). Accordingly, 80% of all specimens investigated originate from localities in Baden–Württemberg (61 localities out of 82 in total) and 14% from Bavarian localities (14 localities). Thuringia, Hesse, Lower Saxony and Rhineland–Palatinate are represented by fewer than five localities. The localities of about 3% of all specimens are questionable. The localities Stuttgart (177 specimens), Feuerbacher Heide (105 specimens; today part of Stuttgart), Eyershausen (45 specimens) and the surroundings of Eberstadt–Lennach–Buchhorn (33 specimens) were the most productive fossil lagerstätten, whereas 31 localities were represented by only one fossil.

The more than 900 specimens belong to 37 genera as well as plant remains that could not be classified at generic level. The most abundant taxa are Equisetites (251 specimens), not better defined equisetoid axis and rhizome remains (150 specimens), Pterophyllum (137 specimens), Voltzia (42 specimens) and Lepidopteris (36 specimens) (Fig. 7). Thus, the horsetails (48%) are the most abundant group, followed by the cycadophytes (16%), ferns (14%) and conifers (9%; Fig. 8). The least abundant are the seed ferns (5%) and lycophytes (1%). Positioning the various plant genera within their respective Macroplant Eco-Groups (MEG, Supplementary material; see also Kustatscher et al. 2010, 2012; Costamagna et al. 2018) it becomes evident that the River MEG dominates (51%), followed by the wet Lowland MEG (22%), the Hinterland MEG (9%) and the dry Lowland MEG (9%). The least abundant is the Coastal MEG (2%). This reflects a general picture of the Schilfsandstein macroflora, which shows a rich and diverse flora dominated by reed-like aggregations of horsetails standing on rivers banks, with fern- and bennettitalean-dominated wetlands (wet lowland) flanking fluvial channels, seed fern-dominated dry floodplain areas (dry lowland) and a conifer-dominated hinterland.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Plant macrofossils of the Schilfsandstein flora; scale bars represent 1 cm for all figures. (a) Sporophyll of Lepacyclotes, Korber Korb (SMNS Pb645). (b) Apical axis fragment of Equisetites, Stuttgart (SMNS P.563). (c) Axis with elongate microphylls of Neocalamites, Stuttgart (SMNS P.666-2). (d) Frond fragment of Dictyophyllum, Stuttgart (SMNS P.196). (e) Frond fragment of Clathropteris, Stuttgart (SMNS P.778). (f) Almost complete leaf of Lepidopteris, Stuttgart (SMNS P.666-1). (g) Leaf of Pterophyllum, Öhringen (SMNS P.21419). (h) Two cone fragments of Glyptolepis, Stuttgart (SMNS P.1866). (i) Large root fragment, Stuttgart (SMNS P.761).

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Quantitative composition of the Schilfsandstein macroflora: 15 localities of South and Central Germany (for locations see Fig. 1).

Comparing the neighbouring localities Stuttgart and Feuerbacher Heide, the composition of the Schilfsandstein macroflora shows only minor changes (Fig. 9). Both macrofloras are dominated by the River MEG (Stuttgart 58%; Feuerbacher Heide 61%), followed by the wet Lowland MEG (22% and 16%) and the dry Lowland MEG (10% and 13%). The occurrence of the Coastal MEG should be noted, with 1% at Stuttgart and 3% at Feuerbacher Heide.

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Macroplant Eco Groups (MEG) of the Schilfsandstein macroflora: 16 localities of South and central Germany (for locations see Fig. 1).

The comparison of the distant localities Eberstadt and Eyershausen (about 190 km distance) suggests more pronounced changes. The Eberstadt macroflora is dominated by conifers (Hinterland MEG) with several not better defined plant remains and a reduced amount of horsetails, supporting a flora that may have been subjected to a higher transport and/or drier conditions. Interestingly, the Hinterland MEG is completely missing in the Eyershausen macroflora. Instead, the flora is composed of 44% wet Lowland MEG, followed by 33% River MEG and 22% dry Lowland MEG (Fig. 9). However, it is important to note that both macrofloras are represented by a limited amount of specimens.

The Schilfsandstein palynoflora and its associations

Samples investigated in this study could be assigned to palynomorph zones GTr 13–15 of Heunisch (1999); 35 productive samples are assigned to the GTr 14 zone covering the Stuttgart Formation. As these samples mainly originate from the lower part of the formation, whereas most samples of the upper part were unproductive, the preservation potential was obviously higher for marine–brackish and fluvio-deltaic environments associated with the first fourth-order T–R sequence (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 10.

Palynomorph Eco Groups (PEG) and palynomorph associations of the Schilfsandstein. O, Ovalipollis association; I, inland sea palynomorph association; L, Leschikisporis association; A, Aulisporites association; T, trilete laevigate spores association, *redrawn from Visscher et al. (1994) (for details and vertical scale see Fig. 2).

In terms of quantitative composition, the palynoflora of the investigated interval can be grouped into five hypothetical palynofacies associations: (1) Ovalipollis association; (2) inland sea association; (3) Leschikisporis association; (4) Aulisporites association; (5) trilete laevigate spores association.

Ovalipollis association

Ovalipollis spp. are present with abundances of 35–70% (Fig. 11). Triadispora spp. and other bisaccate pollen grains (e.g. Striatoabieites) may be present with increased abundances of up to 20% (Supplementary material). Locally, elements of the Coastal PEG (Aratrisporites spp., Leschikisporis aduncus, Duplicisporites granulatus) may occur with higher abundances. Deltoidospora spp. are of accessory occurrence. The Ovalipollis association occurs in dark grey but also variegated shales and siltstones of the topmost Grabfeld and basal Weser Formations. In the North German Basin, the association ranges into the basal Neubrandenburg Member. As the Ovalipollis association appears to be limited to these intervals, it most probably represents the pre- and post-Schilfsandstein palynoflora dominated by dry Lowland and Hinterland PEGs.

Fig. 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 11.

Schilfsandstein palynoflora. 1–16, Obernsees 1 well: 1, 2, Anapiculatisporites spp., P80644. 3, Leschikisporis aduncus, P80644. 4, Lycospora sp., P80644. 5, Kraeuselisporites spp., P80643. 6–8, Aratrisporites spp., P80643. 9, 10, Aulisporites astigmosus, P 80643, P80644. 11, cf. Camerosporites secatus, P80644. 12, cf. Chasmatosporites spp., P80644. 13, Platysaccus spp., P80644. 14, Triadispora crassa, P80644. 15, Araucariacites australis, P80643. 16, overview of P80644, arrows indicate Aulisporites astigmosus. 17, overview of P80639, Medbach well, mass occurrence of Ovalipollis pseudoalatus. Scale bar represents 50 µm for 1–15; 16 and 17 are out of scale.

Inland sea association

The occurrence of this association is limited to grey to blackish shales of the lower Neubrandenburg Member, which yield acritarchs (Micrhystridium spp.), prasinophycean algae (Tasmanites spp., Leiosphaeridia spp.) and green algae (Botryococcus sp., Plaesiodictyon mosellanum, Zygnemataceae). In this interval, the aquatic–marine and aquatic–brackish–freshwater PEGs are present with abundances of >50% (Fig. 10). The terrestrial sporomorphs are still mostly represented by elements of the Hinterland (bisaccate pollen grains, Triadispora spp.) and dry Lowland (mostly Ovalipollis spp.) PEGs.

Leschikisporis association

Leschikisporis aduncus constitutes 25–75% of the assemblage and Aulisporites astigmosus is present at less than 10% (Fig. 11). For individual localities, A. astigmosus may be missing in the palynomorph association (Kahlert et al. 1970). Another important taxon is Aratrisporites spp., which is present at up to 7%. The taxa Deltoidospora spp., Calamospora spp., Osmundacidites wellmanii, Baculatisporites sp., Punctatisporites spp., Cycadopites spp., undifferentiated bisaccate pollen and acritarchs may occur as accessories. The Leschikisporis association is dominated by the Coastal PEG, but also the wet Lowland, dry Lowland, River and Highland PEGs (up to 15%) may be common. As the association could be observed only in dark shales of lower delta plain wetlands in the Neubrandenburg 2 well, its occurrence seems to be limited to central parts of the North German Basin (Fig. 10).

Aulisporites association

Aulisporites astigmosus constitutes >30% of the assemblage whereas Leschikisporis aduncus is present at less than 10% (Fig. 11). For individual samples, the maximum abundances of A. astigmosus (wet Lowland PEG) may even exceed 80% (Supplementary material). Other important forms of the Aulisporites association are elements of the Coastal PEG (Araucariacites australis, Aratrisporites spp.), River PEG (Punctatisporites spp.) and Hinterland PEG (bisaccate pollen grains). Prasinophycean algae, such as Leiosphaeridia spp., may occur as accessories. The Aulisporites association is recorded in dark grey to blackish and often carbonaceous shales and coals of delta plain and floodplain wetlands (Fig. 10).

Trilete laevigate spores association

This association is characterized by a mixture of palynomorphs of the dry Lowland, River and Hinterland PEGs. Trilete laevigate spores, such as Deltoidospora spp., Calamospora spp. and Punctatisporites spp., are present at percentages of up to 30%. A. astigmosus and L. aduncus are also present but at percentages below 25%. Of further importance are Triadispora spp. (<15%), bisaccate pollen grains (<25%) and ornamented spores (<15%). The trilete laevigate spores association is recorded in dark shales but also in laminated silts of floodplain and delta plain wetlands in North Germany (Fig. 10).

Discussion

Low chemical weathering and high evaporation

For this study, only palaeosols and compositional maturity of sandstones were evaluated as palaeoclimate proxies. As authigenic feldspar overgrowths and formation of clay minerals, as a result of burial diagenesis, are common features (Fig. 3; Wurster 1964; Heling 1965; Förster et al. 2010; present study), clay mineral analysis and geochemical weathering indices (e.g. chemical index of alteration; CIA) were ruled out.

The detrital mineralogy presented herein is largely in agreement with data of Wurster (1964), Heling (1965), Dockter et al. (1967), Häusser (1972), Häusser & Kurze (1975), Heling & Beyer (1992) and Förster et al. (2010). A comparison of Rotliegend and Mesozoic sandstones of the North German Basin points to a long-term shift towards increasing maturities (Fig. 3; Häusser & Kurze 1975; present study). This corresponds to published data for the Danish Basin (Ahlberg et al. 2002) and East Greenland (Decou et al. 2017). Together with other arguments, these examples were employed to reconstruct a long-term change from arid Early Triassic climates to humid Jurassic climates (e.g. Ahlberg et al. 2002, 2003; Decou et al. 2017). The low compositional maturity of the Schilfsandstein is apparently not in agreement with this long-term trend. From the Buntsandstein to Middle Jurassic, the North German Basin was mainly fed from Scandinavian sources to the north (Bachmann et al. 2010; Lott et al. 2010; Zimmermann et al. 2018). Considering the stable basin centre and, at least for the Keuper, comparable fluvio-deltaic routing systems (see Franz et al. 2018b), the climatic significance of the low compositional maturity of the Schilfsandstein is underlined by comparisons with the Lower Keuper and Rhaetian (Fig. 3). For the Danish, North German and Polish Basins, the Ladinian climate was reconstructed as semi-humid to humid and the Rhaetian climate was reconstructed as humid (Ahlberg et al. 2002, 2003; Fijałkowska-Mader 2015; Franz et al. 2015; Szulc 2000). Consequently, the low compositional maturity of the Schilfsandstein is ascribed to an arid to semi-arid mid-Carnian climate herein.

The mid-Carnian clastic equivalents are of comparable low compositional maturities. Arkoses to subarkoses were reported by Wurster (1963) and Palain (1966) from the Grès à Roseaux of the Paris Basin and by Díaz-Martínez (2000) and Arche & López-Gómez (2014) from the Manuel Formation and equivalents of the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. Behrens (1973), Seffinga (1988) and Aubrecht et al. (2017) reported lithic arkoses and feldspathic litharenites from the Lunz Beds (type area), Sýkora et al. (2011) and Marschalko & Pulec (1967) reported feldspathic litharenites from the Lunz Beds of the Carpathians, and Jerz (1966) reported arkoses and feldspathic litharenites from the North Alpine Raibl beds.

High abundances of chemically unstable detrital feldspars and also rock fragments are related to low degrees of chemical weathering and short residence time of the sediment (e.g. Johnsson & Meade 1990; Ibbeken & Schleyer 1991). According to Van de Kamp (2010), arkoses in which plagioclase predominates over K-feldspar are the product of feldspathic crystalline sources and glacial or arid to semi-arid climates characterized by a predominance of physical weathering. Chemical weathering in source areas and the basin (e.g. during pedogenesis) will result in hydration of feldspars and formation of clay minerals (Nesbitt & Young 1982). Longer times of residence (e.g. in intermediate deposits) and subsequent reworking will also result in an increase of alteration in the downstream direction (Johnsson & Meade 1990; Van de Kamp 2010). Consequently, the low maturities of mid-Carnian sandstones of the NW Tethys and peri-Tethyan realm indicate low degrees of chemical weathering in source areas and basins.

The record of Schilfsandstein palaeosols described herein corresponds to that of Nitsch (2005). The occurrence of histosols and hydromorphic soils in the Neubrandenburg Member and Lower Schilfsandstein is clearly related to facies shifts triggered by the pre-Schilfsandstein transgression (Fig. 2). During the following regressive phase, the falling sea-level resulted in increased drainage and desiccation of floodplains and delta plains, overprint of hydromorphic soils, and formation of vertisols, calcisols and gypsisols (Fig. 4; Nitsch 2005; present study). Owing to short-term flooding of the intra-Schilfsandstein transgression, hydromorphic soils evolved only locally in the Upper Schilfsandstein whereas stacked successions of gypsisols became abundant (Fig. 6). The widespread occurrence of vertisols, calcisols and gypsisols in the Schilfsandstein provides evidence for a mid-Carnian hydrological regime with high evaporation rates exceeding precipitation rates (e.g. Dan & Yaalon 1982; Retallack 1994; Sheldon & Retallack 2004; Retallack & Huang 2010) in which hydromorphic soils and histosols could develop locally on delta plains and floodplains during phases characterized by high-groundwater stages. A comparable scenario was described by Palain (1966) from the Grès à Roseaux, the equivalent of the Schilfsandstein in the Paris Basin.

From NW Tethyan localities, Behrens (1973), Jelen & Kušej (1982), Pott et al. (2008), Breda et al. (2009) and others described histosols associated with high-groundwater stages on coastal plains.

The Schilfsandstein macroflora

The Schilfsandstein macroflora database may be influenced by collecting and taphonomic biases, as no material could be collected in situ and/or by the authors themselves. However, the presence of abundant badly preserved plant fossils (especially sphenophyte stem remains) suggests that perhaps this bias is not too high. As most of the Schilfsandstein macroflora was recovered from sandstones the preservation is often poor. Nonetheless, is it possible to observe in situ stems as well as several generations of stems growing on top of each other (e.g. Kelber & Hansch 1995).

Frentzen (1930–31) found that the Schilfsandstein flora does not show xerophytic characters. The large leaves of Chiropteris and Danaeopsis demonstrate that there was enough water available and plants did not need to reduce the lamina or use other adaptations to reduce transpiration. Frentzen reconstructed the vegetation as belonging to swamped lowlands laterally associated with fluvial channels.

According to our database, the swamped lowlands (e.g. backswamps) were mainly colonized by horsetails (Equisetites, Neocalamites, Schizoneura) and Pterophyllum. Although Bennettitales are generally considered xerophytes and are indicators of arid environments, Pott et al. (2008) have shown that the macromorphological and epidermal features of Pterophyllum leaves from the mid-Carnian Lunz ecosystem supported peat-forming environments. In the Schilfsandstein ecosystem, the osmundaceous ferns Cladophlebis and Neuropteridium were growing close to and on the riverbanks. The community of the wet Lowland MEG was probably richest in species. The understorey and clearings were filled with a high diversity of ferns (Danaeopsis, Chiropteris, Osmundites, Dictyophyllum; Kustatscher et al. 2012) and shrubby conifers (Pelourdea; Kustatscher et al. 2014). Sphenopteris schoenleiniana would be mostly climbing on the tree-like plants (Kustatscher & Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert 2011).

The cuticles in the Ladinian specimens of Scytophyllum show adaptations to drier or more stressful environments (Kustatscher & Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert 2010; Kustatscher et al. 2012). Also, some other seed ferns (Sagenopteris, Lepidopteris) and Bennettitales (Anomozamites, Zamites) may have grown in dry lowlands or in the hinterland. Some ferns (Asterotheca, Clathropteris) are characterized by a thick, leathery lamina of the pinnules suggesting drier (low groundwater table) or stress-related habitats (e.g. Kustatscher & Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert 2011; Kustatscher et al. 2012). Lepacyclotes, the only lycophyte present in the flora, is considered to grow in coastal areas (Kustatscher et al. 2010, 2012), as is the fern Symopteris (Kustatscher et al. 2011, 2012) and the seed fern Ctenozamites (comparable with Ptilozamites; see Kustatscher & Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert 2005; Popa & McElwain 2009). The conifers grew mainly in drier and more distant floodplains or the hinterland. The longer transport could explain the stage of fragmentation and preservation and the relatively low amount of material, in comparison with the palynoflora.

The Schilfsandstein palynoflora

The associations of the Schilfsandstein palynoflora proposed herein correspond to results of previous studies by Kahlert et al. (1970), Visscher et al. (1994), Orłowska-Zwolińska (1983), Heunisch in Beutler et al. (1996), Fijałkowska-Mader et al. (2015) and others. From the Obernsees 1 well, Visscher et al. (1994) reported the dominance of Ovalipollis pseudoalatus from below the Schilfsandstein. The Lower Schilfsandstein is dominated by Aulisporites astigmosus (wet Lowland PEG; Visscher et al. 1994; present study). Interestingly, Visscher et al. (1994) observed the shift back to the Ovalipollis association (dry Lowland PEG) already in the upper part of the Lower Schilfsandstein (Fig. 10). High abundances of A. astigmosus were also reported by Orłowska-Zwolińska (1983) and Fijałkowska-Mader et al. (2015) from the Polish Basin. From the North German Basin, Kahlert et al. (1970) reported diverse palynomorph assemblages characterized by Leschikisporis aduncus and acritarchs. Interestingly, A. astigmosus was not recorded. From the Kziaz IG 2 and Sulechow IG 1 wells, Orłowska-Zwolińska (1983) reported an assemblage dominated by Leschikisporis aduncus from the lower part of the Schilfsandstein. In accordance with the Leschikisporis association proposed herein, the abundances of A. astigmosus are below 25%. Associations characterized by a mixture of trilete laevigate spores, ornamented spores, bisaccate pollen grains and other palynomorphs were also reported by Orłowska-Zwolińska (1983).

A tentative reconstruction of the Schilfsandstein flora

Any integration of macro- and palynoflora datasets is biased by statistical, palaeogeographical, stratigraphic and palaeoecological limitations. Statistical limitations may exist because for Palynomorph Eco Group analysis (PEG) more than 200 specimens have been counted per sample, whereas only for two localities, Stuttgart and Feuerbacher Heide, were more than 100 macroplant specimens available in collections. As the macrofloras of both localities show comparable compositions, the Stuttgart macroflora is considered statistically relevant.

Palaeogeographical limitations result from the lack of macroflora data from Northern Germany. A palaeogeographical overlap may be provided by the Obernsees palynoflora and the macrofloras of Eyershausen, Gochsheim, Iphofen and Zeil am Main, but as only 14–45 specimens were available from these localities, none of the macrofloras is statistically significant. However, as the macroflora of Iphofen resembles the macroflora of Stuttgart it may be considered statistically relevant (Fig. 9).

The Obernsees palynoflora is well constrained to the Lower Schilfsandstein but the Iphofen macroflora can only be tentatively assigned to this unit. Because of the grey to yellowish rock slabs lacking features of intense pedogenesis, the assignment to the Lower Schilfsandstein appears feasible. The macroflora was recovered from a sandy near-channel succession and the palynoflora from floodplain wetlands, but as both originate from the same channel–floodplain system a comparison is attempted.

The Iphofen macroflora is dominated by the River MEG (63%) followed by the wet Lowland MEG (26%), dry Lowland MEG (5%) and Hinterland MEG (5%). The Obernsees palynoflora is dominated by the wet Lowland PEG (up to 49%), followed by the Hinterland PEG (up to 23%), coastal PEG (up to 21%), River PEG (up to 11%) and dry Lowland PEG (up to 5%). The different abundances of the River MEG and PEG are ascribed to the different environments. Accordingly, the macroflora is dominated by a (para)autochthonous riparian vegetation of sphenophytes, mainly large articulated plant remains and in situ stems, growing on river banks. In the palynoflora the River PEG is less abundant owing to episodic introduction of spores to floodplain wetlands; for example, by crevassing. In accordance with lithofacies, the palynoflora shows high abundances of the wet Lowland PEG and subordinate abundances of the coastal PEG. This is due to high abundances of A. astigmosus, a Bennettitean pollen grain assigned to Williamsonianthus keuperianus (Kräusel & Schaarschmidt 1966). Bennettitales are allocated to the wet Lowland MEG (see above), and therefore A. astigmosus was assigned to the wet Lowland PEG herein. Considering these results, a vegetation of ferns (mostly Marattiales, Osmundales and Dipteridaceae), cycadophytes (Pterophyllum), and shrubby conifers (Pelourdea) is reconstructed for the floodplain lowland and a vegetation of sphenophytes (Equisetites mostly) and osmundaceous ferns (Cladophlebis, Neuropteridium) for the banks of backswamps. The dry Lowland and Hinterland elements represent distant localities. The 26% abundance of the wet Lowland MEG may result either from mixed riparian vegetation of sphenophytes, bennettiteans and ferns, or from mixing during transport processes.

Comparisons of the Schilfsandstein flora with pre- or postcursor Keuper floras are limited, as the Grabfeld and Weser Formations yielded only palynomorphs but not macroplant remains. This and the high abundances of the dry Lowland PEG in these palynofloras emphasize two aspects: (1) wet floodplains represent a taphonomic window allowing the preservation of the Schilfsandstein flora; (2) the Schilfsandstein flora represents an intrazonal flora related to a sea-level highstand in the Central European Basin. Recently, examples of taphonomic windows were reported by Kustatscher et al. (2014, 2017). In particular, the intrazonal riparian Bletterbach flora, which occurred in an arid environment owing to sea-level highstand (Kustatscher et al. 2017), seems to be an analogue for the Schilfsandstein flora.

Sea-level-controlled evaporation forcing the hydrological cycle of the Central European Basin

The data presented herein argue for a rather uniform arid to semi-arid Carnian climate. Considering this and the primary control of circum-Tethyan eustatic third-order and fourth-order cycles (Köppen 1997; Franz et al. 2014), the Schilfsandstein is herein related to changes of the hydrological cycle of the Central European Basin. This was already concluded by Kozur & Bachmann (2010), but those researchers considered the short-term redirection of the NW Tethyan monsoon across the Central European Basin responsible for a pluvial climate in the Scandinavian source area. However, such an unusual circulation pattern remains speculative and a pluvial climate in the Scandinavian source area is not in agreement with the immature Schilfsandstein. Moreover, the monsoonal moisture transport would have also caused seasonal precipitation over the Variscan source areas, the main orographic barrier between the Tethys and Central European Basin. This was shown by Reinhardt & Ricken (2000) on the example of the Norian Löwenstein and Arnstadt Formations, for which seasonal precipitation resulted in intensified chemical weathering (Reinhardt & Ricken 2000; Vollmer et al. 2008) and higher compositional maturity of sandstones (Kulke 1969). Considering this and data presented herein, the Schilfsandstein may not be explained in terms of monsoonal circulation or increased seasonality.

Instead, the accelerated hydrological cycle seems to be related to mid-Carnian transgressions into the Central European Basin. Under arid to semi-arid Carnian climate, the flooded basin contributed to increased evaporation and formation of moisture-laden air masses. Probably transported by northwesterly flowing trade winds, these air masses led to increased rates of precipitation over source areas. During regressive phases, fluvio-deltaic environments prograded basin-wards and supplied detritus predominantly formed of first-cycle sands (Wurster 1964; Van de Kamp 2010). High-groundwater stages favoured the establishment of an intrazonal flora and its preservation in backswamps and floodplain lakes (taphonomic window). From late to maximum regression, the hydrological cycle ceased owing to the retreat of the inland sea and resulting lowered evaporation. Low-groundwater stages were responsible for increased drainage, desiccation and pedogenesis.

The pre-Schilfsandstein transgression represents the most pronounced transgression of the Lower and Middle Keuper. The control of third- and fourth-order mid-Carnian T–R sequences on the hydrological cycle is comparable with conditions for the Upper Muschelkalk and Rhaetian, where pronounced transgressions were followed by progradations of fluvio-deltaic environments from northern sources (Franz et al. 2015; Barth et al. 2018) but, as discussed above, under semi-humid to humid climates.

Conclusions

This study of sedimentary, palynological and palaeobotanical climate proxies of the Schilfsandstein points to the following conclusions.

  1. The Stuttgart Formation was primarily controlled by third- and fourth-order mid-Carnian T–R cycles. Transgressions into the Central European Basin resulted in formation of large inland seas, and regressions allowed the progradation of fluvio-deltaic environments.

  2. For this epicontinental setting, the detrital mineralogy and palaeosols represent reliable proxies of the palaeoclimate. Owing to burial diagenesis, clay minerals and geochemical weathering indices reflect detrital and authigenic signals, and thus do not represent reliable proxies of the palaeoclimate.

  3. The palaeoclimate proxies employed point to a rather uniform arid to semi-arid Carnian climate with low chemical weathering and high evaporation in which flooding of the Central European Basin contributed to increased evaporation rates and formation of moisture-laden air masses. The forced hydrological cycle led to increased precipitation over source areas and increased runoff led to high-groundwater stages on delta plains and floodplains.

  4. The application of MEG and PEG analyses to macro- and palynoflora datasets allows the preliminary reconstruction of the Schilfsandstein flora. Local high abundances of the wet Lowland PEG and MEG are considered intrazonal vegetation of wet lowland habitats. These habitats represent a taphonomic window that was controlled by high-groundwater stages on delta plains and floodplains. Laterally, the (more xerophytic) zonal Carnian vegetation prevailed in habitats of dry floodplains.

  5. The proposed model of sea-level control on the hydrological cycle integrates the low compositional maturity and the coeval and subsequent occurrences of wet backswamps and dry floodplains, hydromorphic and well-drained palaeosols, and intrazonal and zonal vegetations. On the basis of this model, the Schilfsandstein does not provide arguments for a humid mid-Carnian episode.

  6. The model proposed herein may be of significance for other epicontinental basins of the NW peri-Tethyan realm as well as for basins of the NW Tethys controlled by circum-Tethyan eustatic cycles. In these basins, the mid-Carnian clastic equivalents are of low compositional maturity and the occurrence of hydromorphic soils is related to high-groundwater stages on coastal plains.

Acknowledgements

This paper is a contribution to the IGCP-Project 630 (Permian–Triassic climatic and environmental extremes and biotic response). K. Obst and J. Brandes (Landesamt für Umwelt und Naturschutz Mecklenburg–Vorpommern), M. Göthel (Landesamt für Bergbau, Geologie und Rohstoffe Brandenburg), T. Koch and K.-H. Friedel (LAGB Sachsen–Anhalt), L. Katzschmann (TLUG) and W. Freudenberger (Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt) kindly provided access to well data and core material. A. Etzold (LGRB Baden–Württemberg) and G. Sosa (GZG Göttingen) are thanked for descriptions of outcrops and photographs of thin sections. The authors acknowledge constructive reviews by M. Hinderer and an anonymous reviewer, as well as the editorial handling of N. Preto.

Funding

This work was funded by the Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (grant numbers 325285 and 325920 to M.F.). The authors thank the Department of Innovation, Research and University of the Autonomous Province of Bozen/Bolzano for covering the Open Access publication costs.

Scientific editing by Nereo Preto

  • © 2018 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ahlberg, A.,
    2. Arndorff, A. &
    3. Guy-Ohlson, D.
    2002. Onshore climate change during the Late Triassic marine inundation of the Central European basin. Terra Nova, 14, 241–248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Ahlberg, A.,
    2. Olsson, I. &
    3. Šimkevičius, P.
    2003. Triassic–Jurassic weathering and clay mineral dispersal in basement areas and sedimentary basins of southern Sweden. Sedimentary Geology, 161, 15–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Aigner, T. &
    2. Bachmann, G.H.
    1992. Sequence-stratigraphic framework of the German Triassic. Sedimentary Geology, 80, 115–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Arche, A. &
    2. López-Gómez, J.L.
    2014. The Carnian Pluvial Event in Western Europe: new data from Iberia and correlation with the Western Neotethys and Eastern North America–NW Africa regions. Earth-Science Reviews, 128, 196–231.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Aubrecht, R.,
    2. Sýkora, M.,
    3. Uher, P.,
    4. Li, X.-H.,
    5. Yang, Y.-H.,
    6. Putiš, M. &
    7. Plašienka, D.
    2017. Provenance of the Lunz Formation (Carnian) in the Western Carpathians, Slovakia: Heavy mineral study and in situ LA–ICP–MS U–Pb detrital zircon dating. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 471, 233–253.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bachmann, G.H. &
    2. Kozur, H.
    2004. The Germanic Triassic: correlations with the international chronostratigraphic scale, numerical ages and Milankovitch cyclicity. Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften B, 26, 17–62.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Bachmann, G.H. &
    2. Wild, H.
    1976. Die Grenze Gipskeuper/Schilfsandstein bei Heilbronn/Neckar. Jahresberichte und Mitteilungen des Oberrheinischen Geologischen Vereins, 58, 137–152.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Bachmann, G.H.,
    2. Geluk, M.C. et al.
    2010. Triassic. In: Doornenbal, J.C. & Stevenson, A.G. (eds) Petroleum Geological Atlas of the Southern Permian Basin Area. EAGE Publications, Houten, 149–173.
  9. ↵
    1. Balini, M.,
    2. Lucas, S.G.,
    3. Jenks, J.F. &
    4. Spielmann, J.A.
    2010. Triassic ammonoid biostratigraphy: an overview. In: Lucas, S.G. (ed.) The Triassic Timescale. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 334, 221–262, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP334.10
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Barnasch, J.
    2010. Der Keuper im Westteil des Zentraleuropäischen Beckens (Deutschland, Niederlande, England, Dänemark): diskontinuierliche Sedimentation, Litho-, Zyklo- und Sequenzstratigraphie. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, 71.
  11. ↵
    1. Barth, G.,
    2. Franz, M.,
    3. Heunisch, C.,
    4. Ernst, W.,
    5. Zimmermann, J. &
    6. Wolfgramm, M.
    2018. Marine and terrestrial sedimentation across the T–J transition in the Central European Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 489, 74–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Bechstädt, T. &
    2. Schweitzer, T.
    1991. The carbonate–clastic cycles of the East-Alpine Raibl group: result of third-order sea-level fluctuations in the Carnian. Sedimentary Geology, 70, 241–270.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Behrens, M.
    1973. Schwermineralverteilung und Sedimentstrukturen in den Lunzer Schichten (Karn, Trias. Österreich). Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 116, 51–83.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Beutler, G. &
    2. Häusser, I.
    1982. Über den Schilfsandstein der DDR. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften, 10, 511–525.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Beutler, G.,
    2. Heunisch, C.,
    3. Luppold, F.W.,
    4. Rettig, B. &
    5. Röhling, H.G.
    1996. Muschelkalk, Keuper und Lias am Mittellandkanal bei Sehnde (Niedersachsen) und die regionale Stellung des Keupers. Geologisches Jahrbuch A, 145, 67–197.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Brandner, R.
    1984. Meeresspiegelschwankungen und Tektonik in der Trias der NW-Tethys. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt, 126, 435–475.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Breda, A.,
    2. Preto, N. et al.
    2009. The Carnian Pluvial Event in the Tofane area (Cortina d'Ampezzo, Dolomites, Italy). Geo.Alp, 6, 80–155.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Bronn, H.G.
    1851–52. Lethaea geognostica oder Abbildungen und Beschreibung der für die Gebirgs-Formationen bezeichnendsten Versteinerungen. II. Band Meso-Lethaea: Zweite Periode. Trias Gebirge (3. Auflage). Schweizerbart, Stuttgart.
  19. ↵
    1. Chroustchoff, K.v.
    1868. Ueber einige neue Keuperpflanzen. Württembergische Naturwissenschaftliche Jahreshefte, 24, 309–312.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Costamagna, L.G.,
    2. Kustatscher, E.,
    3. Scanu, G.G.,
    4. Del Rio, M.,
    5. Pittau, P. &
    6. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A.
    2018. A palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the Middle Jurassic of Sardinia (Italy) based on sedimentological, palynological and palaeobotanical analyses. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 98, 111–138.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Dal Corso, J.,
    2. Mietto, P.,
    3. Newton, R.J.,
    4. Pancost, R.D.,
    5. Preto, N.,
    6. Roghi, G. &
    7. Wignall, P.B.
    2012. Discovery of a major negative δ13C spike in the Carnian (Late Triassic) linked to the eruption of Wrangellia flood basalts. Geology, 40, 79–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Dal Corso, J.,
    2. Gianolla, P. et al.
    2015. Carbon isotope records reveal synchronicity between carbon cycle perturbation and the ‘Carnian Pluvial Event’ in the Tethys realm (Late Triassic). Global and Planetary Change, 127, 79–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Dal Corso, J.,
    2. Benton, M.J. et al.
    2018. First workshop on the Carnian Pluvial Episode (Late Triassic): a report. Albertiana, 44, 49–57.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Dan, J. &
    2. Yaalon, D.H.
    1982. Automorphic saline soils in Israel. In: Yalon, D.H. (ed.) Aridic Soils and Geomorphic Processes. Catena, Braunschweig, 103–115.
  25. ↵
    1. Decou, A.,
    2. Andrews, S.D.,
    3. Alderton, D.H.M. &
    4. Morton, A.
    2017. Triassic to Early Jurassic climatic trends recorded in the Jameson Land Basin, East Greenland: clay mineralogy, petrography and heavy mineralogy. Basin Research, 29, 658–673.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Díaz-Martínez, E.
    2000. Análisis composicional de la Formación Areniscas de Manuel (Triásico Superior) en las secciones de Almansa, Montealegre y Manuel (províncias de Albacete y Valencia), zona Prebética Oriental: resultados preliminares. Geogaceta, 27, 55–58.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Dockter, J.,
    2. Langbein, R. &
    3. Seidel, G.
    1967. Keuper in Thüringen. Abschlussbericht, VEB Geologische Erkundung West, Jena [unpublished].
  28. ↵
    1. DSK (Deutsche Stratigraphische Kommission)
    (ed.) 2005. Stratigraphie von Deutschland, IV: Keuper. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 253.
  29. ↵
    1. Engel, Th.
    1896. Geognostischer Wegweiser durch Württemberg. Anleitung zum Erkennen der Schichten und zum Sammeln der Petrefacten. Schweitzerbart, Stuttgart.
  30. ↵
    1. Erba, E.
    2004. Calcareous nannofossils and Mesozoic oceanic anoxic events. Marine Micropaleontology, 52, 85–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Etzold, A. &
    2. Bläsi, H.-R.
    2000. Exkursionsführer, Jahrestreffen der AG-Keuper 20.–23.07. 2000 in Waldshut–Tiengen [unpublished].
  32. ↵
    1. Etzold, A. &
    2. Schweizer, V.
    2005. Der Keuper in Baden-Württemberg. In: DSK (Deutsche Stratigraphische Kommission) (Hrsg.): Stratigraphie von Deutschland IV - Keuper. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 253, 214–258.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Fijałkowska-Mader, A.
    1999. Palynostratigraphy, palaeoecology and palaeoclimatology of the Triassic in South-Eastern Poland. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie I, 7–8, 601–627.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Fijałkowska-Mader, A.
    2015. A record of climatic changes in the Triassic palynological spectra from Poland. Geological Quarterly, 59, 615–653.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Fijałkowska-Mader, A.,
    2. Heunisch, C. &
    3. Szulc, J.
    2015. Palynostratigraphy and palynofacies of the upper Silesian Keuper (South Poland). Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 85, 637–661.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Folk, R.L. &
    2. Ward, W.C.
    1957. Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 27, 3–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Förster, A.,
    2. Schöner, R. et al.
    2010. Reservoir characterization of a CO2 storage aquifer: The Upper Triassic Stuttgart Formation in the Northeast German Basin. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27, 2156–2172.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Franz, M.
    2008. Litho- und Leitflächenstratigraphie, Chronostratigraphie, Zyklo- und Sequenzstratigraphie des Keupers im östlichen Zentraleuropäischen Becken (Deutschland, Polen) und Dänischen Becken (Dänemark, Schweden). PhD thesis, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle–Wittenberg, http://sundoc.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/diss-online/08/09H048/index.htm
  39. ↵
    1. Franz, M.,
    2. Nowak, K.,
    3. Berner, U.,
    4. Heunisch, C.,
    5. Bandel, K.,
    6. Röhling, H.-G. &
    7. Wolfgramm, M.
    2014. Eustatic control on epicontinental basins: the example of the Stuttgart Formation in the Central European Basin (Middle Keuper, Late Triassic). Global and Planetary Change, 122, 305–329.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Franz, M.,
    2. Kaiser, S.I. et al.
    2015. Eustatic and climatic control on the Upper Muschelkalk Sea (late Anisian/Ladinian) in the Central European Basin. Global and Planetary Change, 135, 1–27.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Franz, M.,
    2. Bachmann, G.H.,
    3. Barnasch, J.,
    4. Heunisch, C. &
    5. Röhling, H.-G.
    2018a. Der Keuper in der Stratigraphischen Tabelle von Deutschland 2016 – kontinuierliche Sedimentation in der norddeutschen Beckenfazies (Variante B). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, 169, 203–224.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Franz, M.,
    2. Barth, G.,
    3. Zimmermann, J.,
    4. Budach, I.,
    5. Nowak, N. &
    6. Wolfgramm, M.
    2018b. Deep geothermal resources of the North German Basin: exploration examples of Mesozoic hydrothermal reservoirs. In: Kilhams, B., Kukla, P.A., Mazur, S., McKie, T., Mijnlieff, H.F. & van Ojik, K. (eds) Mesozoic Resource Potential in the Southern Permian Basin. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 469, 193–222, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP469.11
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Frentzen, K.
    1922a. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der fossilen Flora des südwestlichen Deutschland. II. Lettenkohlen- und Schilfsandsteinflora. Jahresberichte und Mitteilungen des oberrheinischen geologischen Vereins, 11, 1–14.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Frentzen, K.
    1922b. Die Keuperflora Badens. Verhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Karlsruhe, 28, 1–76.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Frentzen, K.
    1930–31. Die wichtigsten Fundstellen fossiler Pflanzen in Baden und die Entstehung ihrer pflanzenführenden Schichten, 5. Muschelkalk, 6. Keuper, 7. Rhät, 8. Jura, 9. Tertiär. Badische Geologische Abhandlungen, 3, 41–65.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Furin, S.,
    2. Preto, N.,
    3. Rigo, M.,
    4. Roghi, G.,
    5. Giannola, P.,
    6. Crowley, J.L. &
    7. Bowring, S.A.
    2006. High- precision U–Pb zircon age from the Triassic of Italy: implications for the Triassic time scale and the Carnian origin of calcareous nannoplankton and dinosaurs. Geology, 34, 1009–1012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Gajewska, I.
    1973. Charakterystijka osadow piskowca trzcinowego na Nizu Polskim. Kwartalnik Geologiczny, 17, 507–515.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Gattolin, G.,
    2. Breda, A. &
    3. Preto, N.
    2013. Demise of Late Triassic carbonate platforms triggered the onset of a tide-dominated depositional system in the Dolomites, Northern Italy. Sedimentary Geology, 297, 38–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Gattolin, G.,
    2. Preto, N.,
    3. Breda, A.,
    4. Franceschi, M.,
    5. Isotton, M. &
    6. Gianolla, P.
    2015. Sequence stratigraphy after the demise of a high-relief carbonate platform (Carnian of the Dolomites): Sea-level and climate disentangled. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 423, 1–17.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Gianolla, P.,
    2. Ragazzi, E. &
    3. Roghi, G.
    1998. Upper Triassic amber from the Dolomites (Northern Italy). A paleoclimatic indicator? Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 93, 331–347.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Greene, A.R.,
    2. Scoates, J.S.,
    3. Weis, D.,
    4. Katvala, E.C.,
    5. Israel, S. &
    6. Nixon, G.T.
    2010. The architecture of oceanic plateaus revealed by the volcanic stratigraphy of the accreted Wrangellia oceanic plateau. Geosphere, 6, 47–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Häusser, I.
    1972. Zur sedimentpetrographischen Analyse der Sandsteinfolgen des Unteren und Mittleren Keupers im Nordteil der DDR. PhD thesis, Bergakademie Freiberg [unpublished].
  53. ↵
    1. Häusser, I. &
    2. Kurze, M.
    1975. Sedimentationsbedingungen und Schwermineralführung im Mesozoikum des Nordteils der DDR. Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften, 3, 1317–1332.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Heling, D.
    1965. Zur Petrographie des Schilfsandsteins. Beiträge zur Mineralogie und Petrographie, 11, 272–296.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Heling, D. &
    2. Beyer, M.
    1992. Glaukonit im Schilfsandstein: Schlüssel zur kontroversen Faziesanalyse? Jahresberichte und Mitteilungen des Oberrheinischen Geologischen Vereins, Neue Folge, 74, 191–213.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Heunisch, C.
    1999. Die Bedeutung der Palynologie für Biostratigraphie und Fazies in der Germanischen Trias. In: Hauschke, N. & Wilde, V. (eds) Trias: eine ganz andere Welt. Pfeil, München, 13–21.
  57. ↵
    1. Hornung, T.,
    2. Krystyn, L. &
    3. Brandner, R.
    2007a. A Tethys-wide mid-Carnian (Upper Triassic) carbonate productivity crisis: Evidence for the Alpine Reingraben Event from Spiti (Indian Himalaya)? Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 30, 285–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Hornung, T.,
    2. Brandner, R.,
    3. Krystyn, L.,
    4. Joachimski, M.M. &
    5. Keim, L.
    2007b. Multistratigraphic constraints on the NW Tethyan ‘Carnian Crisis’. New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletins, 4, 9–67.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Ibbeken, H. &
    2. Schleyer, R.
    1991. Source and Sediment. Springer, Berlin.
  60. ↵
    1. Jelen, B. &
    2. Kušej, J.
    1982. Quantitative palynological analysis of Julian clastic rocks from the lead–zinc deposit of Mezica. Geologija, 25, 213–227.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Jerz, H.
    1966. Untersuchungen über Stoffbestand, Bildungsbedingungen und Palägeographie der Raibler Schichten zwischen Lech und Inn (Nördliche Kalkalpen). Geologica Bavarica, 56, 3–103.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Johnsson, M.J. &
    2. Meade, R.H.
    1990. Chemical weathering of fluvial sediments during alluvial storage: the Macuapanim Island point bar, Solimoes River, Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 60, 827–842.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Kahlert, N.,
    2. Schulz, E. &
    3. Weyer, D.
    1970. Paläontologischer Kurzbericht zur Bohrung Angermünde 1/68 – Schilfsandstein. Bericht Nr. ZGI 53/70 (unpublished).
  64. ↵
    1. Keim, L.,
    2. Brandner, R.,
    3. Krystyn, L. &
    4. Mette, W.
    2001. Termination of carbonate slope progradation: an example from the Carnian of the Dolomites, Northern Italy. Sedimentary Geology, 143, 303–323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  65. ↵
    1. Keim, L.,
    2. Spötl, C. &
    3. Brandner, R.
    2006. The aftermath of the Carnian carbonate platform demise: a basinal perspective (Dolomites, Southern Alps). Sedimentology, 53, 361–386.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Kelber, K.-P.
    1998. Phytostratigraphische Aspekte der Makrofloren des süddeutschen Keupers. Documenta Naturae, 117, 89–115.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Kelber, K.-P. &
    2. Hansch, W.
    1995. Keuperpflanzen. Die Enträtselung einer über 200 Millionen Jahre alten Flora. Museo, 11, 1–157.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Köppen, A.
    1997. Faziesentwicklung in der frühen Obertrias Mitteleuropas – ein sequenzstratigraphischer Vergleich. Gaea Heidelbergensis, 2.
  69. ↵
    1. Kozur, H. W.
    1970a. Mikropaläontologische Bearbeitung der Bohrung Schillingstedt. Bericht Sektion Geowissenschaften Bergakademie Freiberg [unpublished].
  70. ↵
    1. Kozur, H. W.
    1970b. Mikropaläontologische Bearbeitung der Bohrung Tarnow 1/65. Bericht Sektion Geowissenschaften Bergakademie Freiberg [unpublished].
  71. ↵
    1. Kozur, H. &
    2. Bachmann, G.H.
    2010. The Middle Carnian Wet Intermezzo of the Stuttgart Formation (Schilfsandstein), Germanic Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 290, 107–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    1. Kozur, H.W. &
    2. Weems, R.E.
    2010. The biostratigraphic importance of conchostracans in the continental Triassic of the northern hemisphere. In: Lucas, S.G. (ed.) The Triassic Timescale. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 334, 315–417, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP334.13
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Kräusel, R. &
    2. Schaarschmidt, F.
    1966. Die Keuperflora von Neuewelt bei Basel. IV Pterophyllen und Taeniopteriden. Schweizer Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 84, 1–64.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Kulke, H.
    1969. Petrographie und Diagenese des Stubensandsteines (mittlerer Keuper) aus Tiefbohrungen im Raum Memmingen (Bayern). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 20, 135–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E. &
    2. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A.
    2005. The Ladinian Flora (Middle Triassic) of the Dolomites: Palaeoenvironmental reconstructions and palaeoclimatic considerations. Geo.Alp, 2, 31–51.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E. &
    2. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A.
    2010. Seed ferns and Cycadophytes from the Triassic Flora of Thale (Germany). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 258, 195–217.
    OpenUrl
  77. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E. &
    2. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A.
    2011. The ferns from the Triassic flora of Thale (Germany). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 261, 209–248.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E.,
    2. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A. &
    3. Roghi, G.
    2010. Macrofloras and palynomorphs as possible proxies for palaeoclimatic and palaeoecological studies: A case study of Kühwiesenkopf/Monte Prà della Vacca (Olang Dolomites, N-Italy). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 291, 71–80.
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E.,
    2. Pott, C. &
    3. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A.
    2011. A contribution to the knowledge of the Triassic fern genus Symopteris. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 165, 41–60.
    OpenUrl
  80. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E.,
    2. Heunisch, C. &
    3. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A.
    2012. Taphonomical implications of the Ladinian megaflora and palynoflora of Thale (Germany). Palaios, 27, 753–764.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E.,
    2. Franz, M.,
    3. Heunisch, C.,
    4. Reich, M. &
    5. Wappler, T.
    2014. Floodplain habitats of braided river systems: depositional environment, flora and fauna of the Solling Formation (Buntsandstein, Early Triassic) from Bremke and Fürstenberg (Germany). Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 94, 237–270.
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. Kustatscher, E.,
    2. Bernardi, M.,
    3. Petti, F.M.,
    4. Franz, M.,
    5. Kerp, H.,
    6. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J.H.A. &
    7. Kerp, H.
    2017. Sea-level changes in the Lopingian (late Permian) of the north-western Tethys and their effects on the terrestrial palaeoenvironments, biota and fossil preservation. Global and Planetary Change, 148, 166–180.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Lott, G.K.,
    2. Wong, T.E.,
    3. Dusar, M.,
    4. Andsbjerg, J.,
    5. Mönnig, E.,
    6. Feldman-Olszewska, A. &
    7. Verreussel, R.M.C.H.
    2010. Jurassic. In: Doornenbal, J.C. & Stevenson, A.G. (eds) Petroleum Geological Atlas of the Southern Permian Basin Area. EAGE Publications, Houten, 175–193.
  84. ↵
    1. Mack, G.H.,
    2. James, W.C. &
    3. Monger, H.C.
    1993. Classification of paleosols. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 105, 129–136.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. ↵
    1. Mader, D.
    1990. Palaeoecology of the Flora in Buntsandstein and Keuper in the Triassic of Middle Europe.Volume 2. Keuper and Index. Fischer, Stuttgart, 937–1582.
  86. ↵
    1. Marschalko, R. &
    2. Pulec, M.
    1967. Sedimentology of the Lunz beds. Geologický Sbornik – Geologica Carpathica, 18, 331–344.
    OpenUrl
  87. ↵
    1. Martinez-Perez, C.,
    2. Cascales-Minana, B.,
    3. Plasencia, P. &
    4. Botella, H.
    2014. Exploring the major depletions of conodont diversity during the Triassic. Historical Biology, 27, 503–507.
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. McBride, E.F.
    1963. A classification of common sandstones. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 33, 664–669.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. Miller, C.S.,
    2. Peterse, F.,
    3. da Silva, A.-C.,
    4. Baranyi, V.,
    5. Reichart, G.J. &
    6. Kürschner, W.
    2017. Astronomical age constraints and extinction mechanisms of the Late Triassic Carnian crisis. Scientific Reports, 7, 2557.
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    1. Mueller, S.,
    2. Krystyn, L. &
    3. Kürschner, W.M.
    2016a. Climate variability during the Carnian Pluvial Phase – a quantitative palynological study of the Carnian sedimentary succession at Lunz am See, Northern Calcareous Alps, Austria. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 441, 198–211.
    OpenUrl
  91. ↵
    1. Mueller, S.,
    2. Hounslow, M.W. &
    3. Kürschner, W.M.
    2016b. Integrated stratigraphy and palaeoclimate history of the Carnian Pluvial Event in the Boreal realm; new data from the Upper Triassic Kapp Toscana Group in central Spitsbergen (Norway). Journal of the Geological Society, London, 173, 186–202, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-028
    OpenUrl
  92. ↵
    1. Nesbitt, H.W. &
    2. Young, G.M.
    1982. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature, 299, 715–718.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  93. ↵
    1. Nitsch, E.
    2005. Paläoböden im süddeutschen Keuper (Exkursion E am 31. März). Jahresberichte und Mitteilungen des Oberrheinischen Geologischen Vereins, 87, 135–176.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Ogg, J.G.
    2015. The mysterious Mid-Carnian ‘Wet Intermezzo’ global event. Journal of Earth Science, 26, 181–191.
    OpenUrl
  95. ↵
    1. Orłowska-Zwolińska, T.
    1983. Palynostratigraphy of the upper part of Triassic epicontinental sediments in Poland. Prace Instytutu Geologicznego, 104, 1–89 [in Polish with English summary].
    OpenUrl
  96. ↵
    1. Palain, C.
    1966. Contribution à l’étude sédimentologique du ‘Grès à roseaux’ (Trias supérieur) en Lorraine. Sciences de la Terre, 11, 245–291.
    OpenUrl
  97. ↵
    1. Paterson, N.W.,
    2. Mangerud, G. &
    3. Mørk, A.
    2017. Late Triassic (early Carnian) palynology of shallow stratigraphic core 7830/5-U-1, offshore Kong Karls Land, Norwegian Arctic. Palynology, 41, 230–254.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. ↵
    1. Pettijohn, F.J.
    1957. Sedimentary Rocks. Harper & Brothers, New York.
  99. ↵
    1. Popa, M.E. &
    2. McElwain, J.C.
    2009. Bipinnate Ptilozamites nilssonii from Jameson Land and new considerations on the genera Ptilozamites Nathorst 1878 and Ctenozamites Nathorst 1886. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 153, 386–393.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  100. ↵
    1. Pott, C.,
    2. Krings, M. &
    3. Kerp, H.
    2008. The Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz in Lower Austria: Paleoecological considerations. Palaeoworld, 17, 172–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  101. ↵
    1. Preto, N.,
    2. Kustatscher, E. &
    3. Wignall, P.B.
    2010. Triassic climates – state of the art and perspectives. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 290, 1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  102. ↵
    1. Reinhardt, L. &
    2. Ricken, W.
    2000. The stratigraphic and geochemical record of playa cycles: monitoring a Pangean monsoon-like system (Triassic, Middle Keuper, S. Germany). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 161, 205–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  103. ↵
    1. Reitz, E.
    1985. Palynologie der Trias in Nordhessen und Südniedersachsen. Geologische Abhandlungen von Hessen, 86, 1–36.
    OpenUrl
  104. ↵
    1. Retallack, G.J
    . 1994. The environmental factor approach to the interpretation of paleosols. In: Amundson, R., Harden, J. & Singer, M.J. (eds) Factors in Soils Formation: A Fiftieth Anniversary Retrospective. Soil Science Society of America, Special Publication, 33, 31–64.
    OpenUrl
  105. ↵
    1. Retallack, G.J. &
    2. Huang, C.
    2010. Depth to gypsic horizon as a proxy for paleoprecipitation in paleosols of sedimentary environments. Geology, 38, 403–406.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  106. ↵
    1. Rigo, M.,
    2. Preto, N.,
    3. Roghi, G.,
    4. Tateo, F. &
    5. Mietto, P.
    2007. A rise in the Carbonate Compensation Depth of western Tethys in the Carnian (Late Triassic): deep-water evidence for the Carnian Pluvial Event. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 246, 188–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  107. ↵
    1. Roghi, G.,
    2. Gianolla, P.,
    3. Minarelli, L.,
    4. Pilati, C. &
    5. Preto, N.
    2010. Palynological correlation of Carnian humid pulses throughout western Tethys. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 290, 89–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  108. ↵
    1. Roselt, G.
    1952–3. Zur Flora des Unteren und Mittleren Keupers (Dipl. Arbeit 1952). Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Friedrich-Schiller Universität, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe, 1, 65–66.
    OpenUrl
  109. ↵
    1. Ruffell, A.,
    2. Simms, M.J. &
    3. Wignall, P.B.
    2015. The Carnian Humid Episode of the late Triassic: a review. Geological Magazine, 153, 271–284.
    OpenUrl
  110. ↵
    1. Sandberger, F.v.
    1882. Übersicht der Versteinerung der Trias–Formation Unterfrankens. Verhandlungen der Physikalisch-Medizinischen Gesellschaft Würzburg.
  111. ↵
    1. Schenk, A.
    1864. Beiträge zur Flora des Keupers und der rhaetischen Formation. Berichte der naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Bamberg, 7, 51–142.
    OpenUrl
  112. ↵
    1. Schönlein, J.T. &
    2. Schenk, A.
    1865. Abbildungen von fossilen Pflanzen aus dem Keuper Frankens. Kreidel, Wiesbaden.
  113. ↵
    1. Schröder, B.
    1977. Unterer Keuper und Schilfsandstein im germanischen Trias-Randbecken. Zentralblatt für Geologie und Paläontologie Teil I, 1976, 1030–1056.
    OpenUrl
  114. ↵
    1. Seegis, D.
    2005a. Fische. In: DSK (Deutsche Stratigraphische Kommission) (Hrsg.): Stratigraphie von Deutschland IV - Keuper. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 253, 55–57.
    OpenUrl
  115. ↵
    1. Seegis, D.
    2005b. Muscheln und weitere Invertebraten. In: DSK (Deutsche Stratigraphische Kommission) (Hrsg.): Stratigraphie von Deutschland IV - Keuper. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 253, 61–64.
    OpenUrl
  116. ↵
    1. Seffinga, G.
    1988. Possible evidence of ‘glacial’ conditions during the Julian substage of the Karnian (Upper Triassic). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B, 91, 91–100.
    OpenUrl
  117. ↵
    1. Sheldon, N.D. &
    2. Retallack, G.J.
    2004. Regional paleoprecipitation records from the Late Eocene and Oligocene of North America. Journal of Geology, 112, 487–494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  118. ↵
    1. Shukla, U.K. &
    2. Bachmann, G.H.
    2007. Estuarine sedimentation in the Stuttgart Formation (Carnian, Late Triassic), South Germany. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 243, 305–323.
    OpenUrl
  119. ↵
    1. Shukla, U.K.,
    2. Bachmann, G.H. &
    3. Singh, I.B.
    2010. Facies architecture of the Stuttgart Formation (Schilfsandstein, Upper Triassic), central Germany, and its comparison with modern Ganga system, India. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 297, 110–128.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  120. ↵
    1. Simms, M.J. &
    2. Ruffell, A.H.
    1989. Synchroneity of climatic change and extinctions in the Late Triassic. Geology, 17, 265–268.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  121. ↵
    1. Stefani, M.,
    2. Furin, S. &
    3. Gianolla, P.
    2010. The changing climate framework and depositional dynamics of the Triassic carbonate platforms from the Dolomites. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 290, 43–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  122. ↵
    1. Sun, Y.,
    2. Wignall, P. et al.
    2016. Climate warming, euxinia and carbon isotope perturbations during the Carnian (Triassic) Crisis in South China. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 444, 88–100.
    OpenUrl
  123. ↵
    1. Sýkora, M.,
    2. Siblík, M. &
    3. Soták, J.
    2011. Siliciclastics in the Upper Triassic dolomite formations of the Krížna Unit (Malá Fatra Mountains, Western Carpathians): constraints for the Carnian Pluvial Event in the Fatric Basin. Geologica Carpathica, 62, 121–138.
    OpenUrl
  124. ↵
    1. Szulc, J.
    2000. Middle Triassic evolution of the northern Peri-Tethys area as influenced by early opening of the Tethys Ocean. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 70, 1–48.
    OpenUrl
    1. Thürach, H.
    1888–89. Übersicht über die Gliederung des Keupers im nördlichen Franken im Vergleiche zu benachbarten Gegenden. Erster Theil. Geognostische Jahreshefte, 1, 75–162.
    OpenUrl
  125. ↵
    1. Trotter, A.J.,
    2. Williams, S.I.,
    3. Nicora, A.,
    4. Mazza, M. &
    5. Rigo, M.
    2015. Long-term cycles of Triassic climate change: A new δ18O record from conodont apatite. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 415, 165–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  126. ↵
    1. Van de Kamp, P.C.
    2010. Arkose, subarkoses, quartz sand, and associated muds derived from felsic plutonic rocks in glacial to tropical humid climates. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 80, 895–918.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  127. ↵
    1. Visscher, H. &
    2. Van der Zwan, C.J.
    1981. Palynology of the circum-Mediterranean Triassic: phytogeographical and palaeoclimatological implications. Geologische Rundschau, 70, 625–634.
    OpenUrl
  128. ↵
    1. Visscher, H.,
    2. van Houte, M.,
    3. Brugman, W.A. &
    4. Poort, P.R.
    1994. Rejection of a Carnian (Late Triassic) ‘pluvial event’ in Europe. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 83, 217–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  129. ↵
    1. Vollmer, T.,
    2. Werner, R.,
    3. Weber, M.,
    4. Tougiannidis, N.,
    5. Röhling, H.-G. &
    6. Hambach, U.
    2008. Orbital control on Upper Triassic playa cycles of the Steinmergel-Keuper (Norian): A new concept for ancient playa cycles. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 267, 1–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  130. ↵
    1. Wentworth, C.
    1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology, 30, 377–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  131. ↵
    1. Wurster, P.
    1963. Les problèmes posés par le Grès à Roseaux du Trias supérieur. Sciences de la Terre, 9, 197–219.
    OpenUrl
  132. ↵
    1. Wurster, P.
    1964. Geologie des Schilfsandstein. Mitteilungen des Geologischen Staatsinstituts Hamburg, 33.
  133. ↵
    1. Xu, G.,
    2. Hannah, J.L. et al.
    2014. Cause of Upper Triassic climate crisis revealed by Re–Os geochemistry of Boreal black shales. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 395, 222–232.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  134. ↵
    1. Zhang, Y.,
    2. Li, M. et al.
    2015. Cycle-calibrated magnetostratigraphy of the middle Carnian from South China: Implications for Late Triassic time scale and termination of the Yangtze Platform. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 436, 135–166.
    OpenUrl
  135. ↵
    1. Ziegler, P.A.
    1990. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe. Shell International, Den Haag.
  136. ↵
    1. Zimmermann, J.,
    2. Franz, M.,
    3. Schaller, A. &
    4. Wolfgramm, M.
    2018. The Toarcian–Bajocian deltaic system in the North German Basin: subsurface mapping of ancient deltas – morphology, evolution and recent analogue. Sedimentology, 65, 897–930.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the Geological Society: 176 (1)
Journal of the Geological Society
Volume 176, Issue 1
January 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

The Schilfsandstein and its flora; arguments for a humid mid-Carnian episode?

M. Franz, E. Kustatscher, C. Heunisch, S. Niegel and H.-G. Röhling
Journal of the Geological Society, 176, 133-148, 4 October 2018, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2018-053
M. Franz
1Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universität Göttingen, Abteilung Angewandte Geologie, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Franz
  • For correspondence: mfranz1@gwdg.de
E. Kustatscher
2Museum of Nature South Tyrol, Bindergasse/via Bottai 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy
3Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany
4Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Kustatscher
C. Heunisch
5Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Niegel
1Geowissenschaftliches Zentrum der Universität Göttingen, Abteilung Angewandte Geologie, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.-G. Röhling
5Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

The Schilfsandstein and its flora; arguments for a humid mid-Carnian episode?

M. Franz, E. Kustatscher, C. Heunisch, S. Niegel and H.-G. Röhling
Journal of the Geological Society, 176, 133-148, 4 October 2018, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2018-053
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Journal of the Geological Society article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Schilfsandstein and its flora; arguments for a humid mid-Carnian episode?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the Geological Society
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of the Geological Society.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods and database
    • Stratigraphic control
    • The Schilfsandstein (Stuttgart Formation)
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Funding
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Carnian (Late Triassic) C-isotope excursions, environmental changes, and biotic turnover: a global perturbation of the Earth's surface system
  • The Carnian Pluvial Episode at Ma'antang, Jiangyou in Upper Yangtze Block, Southwestern China
  • The aftermath of the CPE and the Carnian–Norian transition in northwestern Sichuan Basin, South China
Show more: Thematic set: The Mid-Carnian Episode
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Geological Society of London Scientific Statement: what the geological record tells us about our present and future climate
  • The Nonesuch Formation Lagerstätte: a rare window into freshwater life one billion years ago
  • The Shibantan Lagerstätte: insights into the Proterozoic–Phanerozoic transition
  • Linking surface and subsurface volcanic stratigraphy in the Turkana Depression of the East African Rift system
  • Terrestrial stratigraphical division in the Quaternary and its correlation
More...

Journal of the Geological Society

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
0016-7649
Online ISSN 
2041-479X

Copyright © 2021 Geological Society of London